home | photos | downloads | links | resume

Last Updated September 5, 2005

© All images copyright Ethan Shayne except where otherwise noted.

Note: Photos are best viewed with a properly calibrated monitor. This helps to make sure that what you are seeing is at least close to how I intended the photos on this page to be seen. Although precisely calibrating your monitor can be a more involved process, there are some very simple, free tools available to do a basic calibration. If you happen to have Adobe Photoshop installed, you probably already have Adobe Gamma (though you still need to follow Adobe's instructions to actually use it). If not, there's: the ELM Photography monitor calibration page; the MonitorsDirect Calibrator; or you can download and run the Nokia Monitor Test utility (among others).

Please click on a thumbnail to see the full-size picture.

1/25, f/5.6
Manassas Battlefield Park, VA: July, 2005
Canon 20D
Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM lens with B+W UV-Haze filter

1/160, f/5.6
Burke Lake, VA: February, 2005
Canon 20D
Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM lens with B+W UV-Haze filter

1/750, f/5.6
Burke Lake, VA: November, 2003
Canon D60
Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM lens with B+W UV-Haze filter

1/750, f/5.6
1/60, f/5.6
1/2000, f/4.5
Burke Lake, VA: October, 2003
Canon D60
Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM lens with B+W UV-Haze filter

1/250, f/4.5
1/500, f/4.5
Canon Extender EF 1.4x II; 1/350, f/8.0
Yellowstone National Park, WY: September, 2003
Canon D60
Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM lens with B+W UV-Haze filter

badlands
Badlands National Park, SD: August, 2003
Canon D60; Canon 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens with B+W UV-Haze filter
1/500, f/5.6

deer1
deer2
Manassas Battlefield Park, VA: March, 2003
Canon D60; Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM lens with B+W UV-Haze filter
1/500, f/2.8

squirrel
perch
Great Falls, VA: March, 2003
Canon D60; Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM lens with B+W circular polarizer filter
1/750, f/3.5; 1/500, f/3.5

gull4
gull5
yoink
gull7
Burke Lake, VA: January, 2003
Canon D60; Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM lens with B+W circular polarizer filter
1/1000, f/2.8; 1/750, f/2.8; 1/500, f/2.8;
1/1000, f/2.8; 1/1000, f/2.8

dogfield
Manassas Battlefield Park, VA: January, 2002
Olympus C2100
1/160, f/3.5

sunset
Manassas Battlefield Park, VA: December, 2001
Olympus C2100
1/650, f/3.5

gull1 gull2
Alpine Boat Basin, NJ: September, 2001
Nikon F100; Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6D ED AF lens
Kodak E100S Ektachrome Professional, pushed 1 stop
scanned with Nikon LS-4000 and VueScan software

Lake Anna, VA: June, 2001
Nikon F100; Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6D ED AF lens
Kodak E100S Ektachrome Professional
scanned with Nikon LS-4000 and VueScan software

Spuyten Duyvil Bridge
Spuyten Duyvil Bridge, NY: October, 2000
Nikon F100
Agfa RSX II-100
scanned with Nikon LS-4000 and VueScan software

dock bridges
Hudson & East Rivers, NJ/NY: August, 2000
Nikon F100
Kodak E100S Ektachrome Professional
scanned with Nikon LS-4000 and VueScan software

Alpine Boat Basin, NJ: June, 2000
Nikon F100
Fuji Provia 100F
scanned with Nikon LS-4000 and VueScan software

palisades
Alpine Boat Basin, NJ: May, 2000
scanned with Nikon LS-4000 and VueScan software

fishing canoes island
Shenandoah River, VA & WV: April, 2000
Nikon F100; Nikkor 35-70mm f/2.8D AF lens
Kodak Gold 100
scanned with Nikon LS-4000 and VueScan software

dusk
Kingston, NY: Fall, 1997
Photo taken by Charles Shayne (my father)
scanned with Microtek E3

jump
Demarest, NJ: March, 1987
Minolta X-370
Kodak Tri-X Pan (400)
scanned with Nikon LS-4000 and VueScan software

racoon
Camp Thoreau-in-Vermont, Vermont: Summer, 1983
Kodak Tri-X Pan (400)
scanned with Nikon LS-4000 and VueScan software

cuz
Kodak TMY-100
scanned with Nikon LS-4000 and VueScan software
juggling
shadow
Kodak T-Max 400
scanned with Nikon LS-4000 and VueScan software

VanCortland Park, Riverdale Press
The Riverdale Press: VanCortland Park, NY: July, 1987
Minolta X-370
Kodak T-Max 400

track, Suburbanite
The North Jersey Suburbanite: May 4, 1988: Northern Valley Regional High School Track Meet

None of the above photos have been digitally manipulated - where "manipulated" is defined as per the photo.net web site. In other words, in the case of film that was scanned, what is shown on this page is as accurate a digital copy as I could make of the original print or slide. In the photos taken with a digital camera, minor exposure/contrast adjustments were made, and in some cases minor color and sharpness adjustments. The general idea here is that any of these photos could have been taken with a traditional film camera and prints made at any standard professional photo processing lab for similar results - the only reasons digital was used was for convenience of processing and sharing.

Many thanks to Wayne Fulton for his A Few Scanning Tips site.

Any feedback is appreciated, whether compliments or criticisms. (Most helpful, though, would be if you can suggest what you think might have made the picture better.)

home | photos | downloads | links | resume