MAURICE ASHLEY: Welcome to the second game of the Kasparov vs. Deep Blue match, a match that has been touted the world over as the benchmark of artificial intelligence vs. the human mind. I'm Maurice Ashley, along with International Master Mike Valvo. Joining us soon will be International Grandmaster Yasser Seirawan. And yesterday's game was highly dramatic. It was the kind of game that everybody wanted to see. Exciting, bold play. Kasparov at first was very timid with his play. He wanted to be cautious. But Deep Blue took it to him, wanted to play very exciting chess, very unconventional chess in the early stages, but later it got wild and woolly, and Kasparov was able to manage the complications and deal with the computer on its own ground. Mike, what do you think about yesterday's game? Do you think Deep Blue has a chance to bounce back after that kind of defeat? MIKE VALVO: Well, they better! You know, it's exactly the kind of game that Deep Blue was aiming for. A wild game. Didn't follow any kinds of positional ideas that you would think of. Every positional idea you had went right out the window. What did Garry do? Went right back in again, sacrificed the exchange, and got those two pawns up there and strangled him. They couldn't move a rook. MAURICE ASHLEY: No, they couldn't. It was a very interesting game from the standpoint that Kasparov was trying to control so much. He later mentioned when he was on the stage on the interview that he was trying to impose his will on the position, but he didn't seem to be able to. Although he was trying to play a quiet game -- He mentioned he won the game without ever putting one of his pieces over the fourth rank, but still the computer was very aggressive. And now he has entered the hall playing area. In center stage, he is actually in the 35th floor of this building, the Equitable Building. He has the black pieces this game. He had the white pieces last game. He said that he didn't want history to repeat itself in losing game one, but he did win game one with the white pieces, which is the same thing that happened last year, except Deep Blue had white. So the program is hoping that history does repeat itself and they pick up some wins the way he had. So they get white this game, and I guess the big issue is, what are they going to do? Last year they are very passive, Mike, with the white pieces. Do you think they're going to be more aggressive? MIKE VALVO: They're going to be as aggressive as they can. I was kind of curious, what does the audience think the first move will be for Deep Blue? How many of you say e4? How many say d4? Only a handful. Any other move? MAURICE ASHLEY: We have our first poll, and it seems as if e4 is the consensus. And we'd like to welcome three-time U.S. champion, Grandmaster Yasser Seirawan. And we should mention that this going live over the WebTV and is live over the Internet, so we welcome the viewing audience, who are viewing this all over the country, in different museums all over the country. Yaz -- MIKE VALVO: Libraries. Smithsonian. YASSER SEIRAWAN: Globally, actually, globally. This match is being followed by literally millions of chess fans over the entire globe. Hundreds of countries are actually following the match. MAURICE ASHLEY: Not just chess fans. YASSER SEIRAWAN: Not just chess fans. MAURICE ASHLEY: Others who are interested in what this might mean, the great implications for mankind, the computer, and artificial intelligence. MIKE VALVO: One Grandmaster told me he was very upset when Deep Blue played Be7. He told me that Garry had done everything right, and now the computer was just going to blow apart everything that people thought was correct. He was very upset. MAURICE ASHLEY: He was really against change, wasn't he? As if a success for the computer is not a success for the programmers, but somehow a success for this beast, a silicon giant is somehow going to rule the world someday. YASSER SEIRAWAN: Well, I mean we've all read our science fiction, and, gosh, there is the "War of the Worlds" and everything else. I think being replaced by computers I think is a big fear. But as the IBM team was up here yesterday explaining, boy, it's a machine. It's dumb, and whatever they put in comes out. I was just going to say that I had a wonderful conversation this morning with my chess friend and Grandmaster Ron Henley, and he said, "You know, Yasser, I had a very strange feeling of watching my world of chess yesterday being turned upside down, because I thought" -- this is Ron speaking -- "that ourselves did a very good job of explaining all the disadvantages that the computer was doing, and suddenly after that move f5 came yesterday," he said, "My God, the computer is going to win, and I have to rethink everything I've ever known about chess. I'm so happy when Garry won the game, because I didn't have to rethink my whole strategy of chess." And yesterday what we saw was the accumulation of tiny advantages that were beyond the computer's horizon so that Garry, as time wore on, his position became better and better and better. And by the time they reached the ending, Garry had the game wrapped up. But Deep Blue and our friend Fritz couldn't see that far ahead and always felt that Deep Blue was in the game. MAURICE ASHLEY: What about the school of thought, Mike, that "What's so bad about rethinking our views on chess? What's so bad if the computer could show us novel strategies that we've never thought of before, that would now add to our understanding of our game of what was possible?" DB MOVE: 1 e4 MAURICE ASHLEY: I'll give you a chance to answer the question. Our in-house audience has guessed the move for Deep Blue, and it has played the move e2-e4. Remember last year it was very passive against Kasparov's typical response, the Sicilian, which was to play c7-c5. GK MOVE: 1...e5 MAURICE ASHLEY: And a surprise. Garry Kasparov has responded with the move e7-e5, a double e-pawn opening. A move that's been played immediately. But this, Yaz, has to come as a surprise. We'll get back to that question in a moment. This has to come as a surprise for the program. This is not something that Garry Kasparov plays often, this variation. This is a classical opening. DB MOVE: 2 Nf3 GK MOVE: 2...Nc6 DB MOVE: 3 Bb5 YASSER SEIRAWAN: Deep Blue has continued Bb5. This initiates what is known as the Ruy Lopez. GK MOVE: 3...a6 YASSER SEIRAWAN: Garry responds a7-a6. The Morphy Defense of the Ruy Lopez. We'll get into the historical significance in a moment. DB MOVE: 4 Ba4 YASSER SEIRAWAN: The standard retreat, Bb5-a4. And I was starting to say that I had thought that Garry was going to play a Sicilian. GK MOVE: 4...Nf6 YASSER SEIRAWAN: Oh, another move, Ng8-f6. MAURICE ASHLEY: The moves are coming out quickly right now. This is all standard opening theory. And one thing about this opening, Yaz, is that this is extremely flexible. The option for black to choose several different defenses. So the programmers have to be very careful. They hadn't suspected his playing this at all. Garry could be springing a nice trap. YASSER SEIRAWAN: But Garry used to play the black side of the Ruy in the early games against Karpov. DB MOVE: 5 00 GK MOVE: 5...Be7 DB MOVE: 6 Re1 MAURICE ASHLEY: We have castles for white, Bf8-e7 for black, and then Rf1-e1. All standard. YASSER SEIRAWAN: All very standard territory. Again, I was just going to say that I expected the Sicilian by Garry for the first game. GK MOVE: 6...b5 YASSER SEIRAWAN: Another move, b7-b5. And we are sure to see the move Ba4-b3 in just a moment. DB MOVE: 7 Bb3 MIKE VALVO: Do you think we'll see the Marshall? YASSER SEIRAWAN: No. MAURICE ASHLEY: "Marshall" a reference to the famous Marshall Attack, sacrificing a pawn for the initiative. I'm sure the computer would take that pawn, considering how materialistic it is. GK MOVE: 7...d6 MAURICE ASHLEY: Kasparov, after the computer played Ba4-b3, has played d7-d6. DB MOVE: 8 c3 YASSER SEIRAWAN: And then the computer played c2-c3. This is the most classical of all openings. This opening has been played for a hundred, 200 years. GK MOVE: 8...00 YASSER SEIRAWAN: And again, the quick response by Garry, castles king-side. We'll go backwards in time and we'll go over some of these moves. We just maintain the current position. MIKE VALVO: This is the critical move for Garry, I think. DB MOVE: 9 h3 MAURICE ASHLEY: h2-h3 has been played. Classical setup. So many options here for black. And whatever Kasparov's preparation has been for this match, although he said that he has played the Ruy Lopez several times and Kasparov could pretty much play anything he wants to, his knowledge is that encyclopedic, he normally doesn't reel this out for his big games. He likes the Sicilian, as we saw in the match against Anand in 1995. He used the Sicilian exclusively in that match in order to defend with the black pieces, but now he's decided to play the classical opening, and it should be interesting what his strategy is in this match to counter the computer's abilities. MIKE VALVO: He's thinking now, too. I wonder if he's choosing between a number of preparations. YASSER SEIRAWAN: No, I think he's kind of getting the Zen of the position. Perhaps he didn't expect it to occur so quickly. Just to give you an idea of how many moves in this position have been cataloged, there is the move Nc6-a5, that is referred to as Smyslov's move. There's the move Bb7, the Zaitsev. There's the move -- whoops -- Nc6-b8, the Byrne Variation. There's the move Nd7, the Tchigorin Variation. There are a lot of possibilities for Garry at this point. And Re8, of course. So we won't get into that too much. But I wanted to say that in the match in Philadelphia, in game five, that was really the pivotal game. At that moment the match was tied. Garry played the classical king pawn defense, and that turned out into a Scotch. The computer had a slight advantage, then it became a balanced game, and Garry offered a draw. The programmers refused the draw, and Garry went on to win. So, from Garry's perspective, he's played the double king pawn and won, so why not have another success and keep up the fun. MAURICE ASHLEY: The other side, though, Mike, is that programmers would most likely expect this, and they're -- on the team of programmers is Grandmaster Joel Benjamin, who has spent a year of his chess life working with the Deep Blue team, has basically said, "Forget about my aspirations; I want to see the success of this computer against Kasparov." And he's very much aware of the possibilities that Kasparov can play. And he's sort of like the opening book for Deep Blue. He decides the opening variations they will go into to see what would work with the computer's strengths and with Kasparov's weaknesses. MIKE VALVO: I would bet that he spent 50 percent of his time on the Sicilian Defense, suspecting that that was going to be the normal response. And, gosh, how much could he have spent on this? YASSER SEIRAWAN: Indeed. And even were Grandmaster Joel Benjamin to even have correctly guessed this position, he could have spent another several years trying to guess -- again, there are just so many possibilities with Bc8-e6 inclusive. Yeah, we will have to say with Garry's choice here, that Deep Blue couldn't have anything special prepared. In other words, we would expect that Deep Blue would carry forward with its opening library and then finally get a novel position. MAURICE ASHLEY: An interesting thing here we should note is that there are chess photographers in the room currently, and they're taking photographs of Kasparov, and Murray Campbell, who is the operator of Deep Blue. And in a situation like this, with the flashes going off, one could expect -- one could expect, since the photographers can only be there for about ten minutes, one can expect Kasparov to relax a bit and give them a chance to clear out of the room so that he can focus his thoughts on playing the game. YASSER SEIRAWAN: A very good point. I know that -- In fact, we're seeing that now, the world's press is beginning to get pushed aside. Normally speaking in International Grandmaster competitions, it's limited to the first five minutes of play, flashbulb photography. And I know that for -- because the demand was so great at yesterday's game, they asked everybody to get there ten minutes early so there could be a 15-minute session. We are seeing the press being cleared out, and I think we'll be seeing Garry making his choice, his prepared choice. MAURICE ASHLEY: We should set up the scene for those who do not have the benefit of a visual aid around the country, those following on the Internet, only maybe on the chessboard and seeing our words being typed on their monitors. Here in the playing hall of this Equitable Building, that is, the auditorium of the Equitable Building, the three of us, a large audience watching the games. We do have three computer games behind us, one showing the board -- three video screens. One showing the current board position, one showing our analysis board -- that's in the center -- and to the left is Garry Kasparov, and he is pondering the board. We want to watch Garry as closely as possible, because he does a variety of things of interest to us. We know he's very, very showy with his emotions. He tends to let you know exactly how he's feeling about every position. And I've been watching Kasparov now for four years or so in a variety of world championship matches -- the Grand Prix series, I've seen him in the Deep Blue match -- and I know his faces pretty well. It is kinds of things he does when he's in trouble, when he's confident. We should point out two things you should note. First of all, the watch. How many of you know about the watch? When Kasparov takes the watch off, it means he's going into a deep think. That's the first thing. And this happened yesterday. We saw that happen. And the second thing -- and then when the watch goes back on, it means the game is over and, you know, it's time to wrap up because I've got to go have dinner. That's definitely a sign. We saw that yesterday, after he played the winning move g6-g7, and it was over; he slipped the watch on, and Murray Campbell offered his resignation. The final thing that Kasparov hopes does not happen, and I've not seen happen too frequently, is the jacket. Kasparov always plays with the jacket on, but if he ever takes it off, it means that he's in deep trouble and he's got to get himself out of it. So, from Kasparov's viewpoint, he hopes that doesn't happen. But in between that, the variety of faces, pulls, shifts, leg shakes, all the like that reveal very much the character and feelings that Kasparov has during a chess game. And you've seen it several times, and he has -- GK MOVE: 9...h6 MAURICE ASHLEY: An option to all the options we've spoken about, he's played the move h7-h6, which comes as a bit of a surprise, Yaz. This move -- YASSER SEIRAWAN: Yes -- DB MOVE: 10 d4 GK MOVE: 10...Re8 MAURICE ASHLEY: I'm not quite sure I've seen it before. No doubt Deep Blue has it adequately prepared, and has quickly played the move d2-d4, and Kasparov quickly responding with Re8. So I guess by transposition we've gone back into a known system. DB MOVE: 11 Nbd2 YASSER SEIRAWAN: The Zaitsev. We now have another move after Rfe8. We have the move for white Nb1-d2. Again, this is a very classical formation. What white seeks to achieve -- GK MOVE: 11...Bf8 YASSER SEIRAWAN: We have another move. MAURICE ASHLEY: Bishop has moved to f8 from e7. YASSER SEIRAWAN: Indeed. And we will see -- DB MOVE: 12 Nf1 MAURICE ASHLEY: Nd2 jumping to f1. All these moves have been played before, but Kasparov usually on the white side in his world championship matches against Karpov. YASSER SEIRAWAN: Absolutely. MIKE VALVO: He's played this as black, though, this line. GK MOVE: 12...Bd7 YASSER SEIRAWAN: And we have another move yet. MIKE VALVO: That's new for him. He usually plays Bb7. YASSER SEIRAWAN: Bc8-d7. MAURICE ASHLEY: We're apparently still in Deep Blue's book. DB MOVE: 13 Ng3 YASSER SEIRAWAN: Nf1-g3. MAURICE ASHLEY: Nf1-g3. Its repository of knowledge it's just counting on. GK MOVE: 13...Na5 MAURICE ASHLEY: And Kasparov playing quickly also, playing Nc6-a5. And it's hard for us to even begin to explain what's going on, they're moving so quickly. DB MOVE: 14 Bc2 YASSER SEIRAWAN: And another move. MAURICE ASHLEY: Deep Blue moving its bishop from under the gaze of that knight on a5, Bc2. GK MOVE: 14...c5 MAURICE ASHLEY: And Kasparov is playing quickly, c7-c5. They're just whipping out the moves now. MIKE VALVO: It will be over in 20 minutes, or what? YASSER SEIRAWAN: Well, we are seeing some basketball playoffs this weekend, aren't we? We've transposed right back into the Smyslov Variation I had mentioned earlier. That's depicted by the move Nc6-a5. DB MOVE: 15 b3 YASSER SEIRAWAN: We have another move. MAURICE ASHLEY: Another move by Deep Blue, b2-b3. And we will see who blinks first. And Kasparov hesitating at the board now. YASSER SEIRAWAN: We've just seen the 15th move. And again, the openings in chess have been mapped out for centuries. This particular opening, the Ruy Lopez -- now I'm going to be tested on my historical data, but it was introduced by a Franciscan Spanish priest by the name of Ruy Lopez, and I believe in the 15th century -- MIKE VALVO: Yes. YASSER SEIRAWAN: -- was when this opening was introduced. Now, stop and think about that for a moment. The 15th century, they've been playing this opening ever since. The idea of the opening is what we call the classical center. This is depicted by the d4 pawn and the e4 pawn. GK MOVE: 15...Nc6 MAURICE ASHLEY: Another move has been played, Na5-c6. YASSER SEIRAWAN: White, in this opening, seeks to maintain his pawn center -- DB MOVE: 16 d5 MAURICE ASHLEY: I guess not, because he just advanced the d-pawn to d5, attacking the knight on c6. So clearly we're still in opening book. This is opening theory. This is the kind of thing that has been played several times. GK MOVE: 16...Ne7 MAURICE ASHLEY: And Kasparov quickly responding, moving his knight back to e7 from c6. YASSER SEIRAWAN: Nc6-e7. DB MOVE: 17 Be3 MAURICE ASHLEY: And Deep Blue responding immediately Be3. Usually I get to do play-by-play. This is getting a little ridiculous. GK MOVE: 17...Ng6 YASSER SEIRAWAN: Push, push, push. MAURICE ASHLEY: And Kasparov playing instantly. We've seen 17 moves in all of two minutes, maybe. It's just instantaneous chess going on. At some point someone's got to be out of their book. YASSER SEIRAWAN: Right. MAURICE ASHLEY: And we'll get a chance to breathe and explain a little bit of what's going on. And after Ne7-g6, Kasparov has gotten up from the chessboard. He has a dressing room in back of their playing area so that he often retires to that area, particularly when he feels comfortable about the position, and with his vast knowledge of opening theory as we're seeing him evidence here, it's clear that he's very, very comfortable, probably is just where he wants to be, he is not worrying about anything, and he's expecting Deep Blue to come up with something new, something interesting. This last move, Ng6, has caused Deep Blue to hesitate just a bit, Yaz. He's not played immediately, so maybe we've seen the innovation that Kasparov has sprung so that Deep Blue will have to think on its own. MIKE VALVO: It's out of book. YASSER SEIRAWAN: Indeed. The idea is that had Garry played one of the moves in Deep Blue's computer library, Deep Blue would have responded quickly. So the move Ng6 is probably out of its library now, and now Deep Blue is going into its first think of the game. And let's see if we can try to explain what's going on in the position. Well, first of all, what ourselves spoke about yesterday is what's the ideal way of playing against the computer? And in the competition at Aegon, a recent competition I played in The Hague, it was quite clear that what the human player sought to do was blockade the position. And the definition of a blockade is where the pawn chains interlock in such a way that all the lines are closed. So we have a closed opening here. If you look at this chain of pawns in the middle of the board, you notice that no captures by pawns are possible, and so it becomes not a game of play in the center, but rather, play on the flanks. Whenever you have a game where the game is being played on the flanks, you're going to see a great deal of maneuvering. And in this part of chess, the human players are extremely good. And our counterparts, our silicon counterparts, have not caught up. So computers tend to get out-maneuvered in closed positions. So what Garry has achieved -- it's not his bailiwick, what he would normally like to do -- but he has achieved his closed position. The situation on the king-side is rather interesting. If you notice, all four knights are rather balanced. Both knights -- White may spring his knight to the f5 square with Ng3-f5, or, vice versa, black may play Ng6-f4. So we have a very balanced position on the king-side. The queen-side, not too much is happening on the queen-side. Probably white at some point in the future will have to play the move a2-a4 to unlock the secrets on the queen-side. MAURICE ASHLEY: Considering that blocked positions are -- that computers are known to play blocked positions notoriously poorly, Mike, why do you think that the programmers, and I guess more specifically Joel Benjamin, would allow this kind of situation to occur when he knows his baby doesn't do as well under these conditions? MIKE VALVO: Well, he can't look at actually everything, in his preparations, and he made a rough assumption that he would not very likely get into this line, so he just programmed in some book that was generally accepted that everybody plays and left it at that. He probably never even looked at this more than five or ten minutes, I would bet. And -- DB MOVE: 18 Qd2 YASSER SEIRAWAN: And just to buttress that point, I'm sure that at some point during their 14-month preparation for this match, that Deep Blue's team never had this specific position in their study. And we do have another move. MIKE VALVO: And indeed, Deep Blue may have never actually seen this position. It was all programmed in. It was nothing it knew itself. MAURICE ASHLEY: The last move by Deep Blue, queen from d1 to d2, has been played, and Kasparov has quickly come back to the board. But still, let's follow that point a little bit, since it seems very interesting to me. How is it that you program moves into the computer -- I mean 14 months is a long time. What do they do so that Deep Blue knows that this is the move it should play? Why did it play so quickly, if these moves were programmed in but not looked at at all? Who was programming in the moves and not looking at the moves? Seems to be a disadvantage for the computer to be -- MIKE VALVO: Yeah, it is. And sometimes all they can do is have the computer analyze all of the end or terminal positions of a line and see if it likes it. And if it likes it, they'll accept it. Sometimes they can do a deep analysis of it, and sometimes they can't. Sometimes they'll let it think at night when nobody's watching, and unless there's some kind of a problem, they'll incorporate it. But yes, this is not the ideal position for a computer. Humanness is great because a human thinks conceptually, and concepts of maneuvering is sort of required. And computers kind of think a move at a time here. They're just trying to find the best position. The best position for them is where they have the most space, the most lines, the most squares they can go to. And in this kind of blocked position, it doesn't field it very well. GK MOVE: 18...Nh7 MAURICE ASHLEY: Kasparov played the position as if it does appeal to him. He's played the knight from f6 to h7, beginning fairly standard maneuvers in this kind of opening. And again, this is what the human being excels at. Kasparov, as good as anyone in the world, will play blocked positions with finesse. He prefers the more rough-and-tumble position, the more open, but he is the world champion, so his variety of skills -- A question I asked you earlier, Mike, what's the feeling on our part, from the human perspective, why is it that we're so against the idea of learning from the computer? I mean the computer has so much to offer. And if it maps out new chess ground, and some of the principles that we thought were good are now proven to be maybe not so accurate, shouldn't we be happy about that? Shouldn't we be learning from that? Why are we so against that, if we want to see Kasparov prove that the old stuff is still the good stuff? MIKE VALVO: Well, I have to kind of think about my own fears as a human, and I think one of the fears that I would have is I'd be playing against God, and, gee, could I survive in that kind of position, where I'm playing against somebody who makes absolutely perfect moves. And this is the kind of fear that we also talked about yesterday when he said, "Mate in 68." Remember that? When he talked about an endgame position, and the computer says, "I know this right until the very end of the game." How would you feel like if somebody said "Mate in 68" to you, that you had no chance, nothing you could do? MAURICE ASHLEY: That's a good point. The story was in the Aegon tournament that one of the computers did announce a checkmate in 68, and you know it's going to be checkmate in 68 moves, you might as well resign then. And the thing is, mate in 68 IF you play the best moves. Maybe you play some bad moves and it will be mate in 58, or mate in 40. So every move you make is the misery of the computer telling you, "No, that's a terrible move. Now I'm going to checkmate you even quicker." So that kind of thing can hit the ego there, Yaz? YASSER SEIRAWAN: Oh, I had told the person to whom it happened, "I would have resigned immediately. There's no way I'm going to sit there and suffer through this one." While you were speaking, Mike, I did want to say that there is -- DB MOVE: 19 a4 YASSER SEIRAWAN: Oops. We have some more moves. a2-a4 for white. There is a certain phobia about the computer kind of encroaching in on our turf, if you will, the chessboard and the mind. But I do want to say that, at the same time, the chess world has truly embraced computers. Not across the board, but certainly embraced computers. One area is actually the rules. How many of you know that computers have affected the rules of chess? MAURICE ASHLEY: Not that many. YASSER SEIRAWAN: Not that many in our audience. Keep in mind that the last rule change, literally rule change occurred about 500 years ago with the castling and en passant rule, the rule of en passant. And what happened is, as you're struggling in a game of chess, and let's say you're trying to hold on, you're trying to hold onto the position, and your opponent hasn't made any progress. The idea is the opponent is given 50 moves in order to win the game. We have what we call the 50-move rule. Well, some computer programmer sat down and discovered that there is a whole assortment of positions that are winning but cannot be won in 50 moves. And so FIDE, the officially-sanctioned body of chess, the Federation Internationale Des Echecs, changed the rules in certain positions because there's a forced made in 128 moves or 225 moves. And they extended the rules from certain positions from 50 moves to 75 moves. Recently, there's been a lot of pitter-patter back and forth, and I don't even know today what the current situation is. MIKE VALVO: I believe it's 50 now. They went back. YASSER SEIRAWAN: They went back. But at one time the computer has proven that certain positions are won, and they determine that, you know, the player had the right to try to prove a win if they have a winning position. That was especially true of some rook and bishop vs. rook endings. MAURICE ASHLEY: Let's take a look at the position on the board, because it seems as if play has settled down, and Kasparov is beginning to think about the last move by Deep Blue, a2-a4, and this is looking like his first real think of the game. I don't think the watch has come off, though. AUDIENCE MEMBER: Yeah. MAURICE ASHLEY: The watch is off. I missed that. AUDIENCE MEMBER: The first move. MAURICE ASHLEY: He did? Okay. So he's serious about that one, and she's showing that right away, and he's in a deep think trying to figure out what to do. Yaz, why don't you break this position down for us. (Video screen shows watch on the table.) (Audience laughter.) MAURICE ASHLEY: They didn't show me the watch. I slipped up on that one. Give us a little handle on what's happening here in this position. YASSER SEIRAWAN: Well, I would love to, but I'll do my best -- GK MOVE: 19...Nh4 YASSER SEIRAWAN: Let's see what Garry has done. Garry has played Ng6-h4, offering a trade of knights. He attacks the knight on f3. Again, just in general, understanding the position, the center is blocked. Play takes place on the wings. The move a2-a4 by white was to induce an opening on the queen-side, and the move Ng6-h4 is that Kasparov would like to play on the king-side. So we're going to see a lot of things happening on the flanks. I would also like to say that during this match we're going to have a lot of guest commentators, people coming up on stage. We'll be taking a lot of questions from our audience. And it's really a special moment for all of us, because we're having some fantastic people in our audience who will be joining us. And in these classical positions, me being an exceptionally young player, I don't know them so well, and I would like to defer to a really, really old player who is in our audience, a man who has trained me in the past and knows chess inside and out. He's here from Washington -- actually Reston, West Virginia. Grandmaster Lubosh Kavalek is in the back. And, like nobody else in this audience, he'll be able to tell us what's going on. Right, Luboshy? MIKE VALVO: While they're getting him a mike, I'm going to mention that we're going to have question-and-answer sessions later on, and if you would like to ask a question, there will be people with mikes in both of the aisles. Are they here now? Can you raise your hands, who have the mikes? And try to get over to like one of the three seats on the end if you have a question, when we get into the question-and-answer periods. So they can pass you the mike, and we can answer the questions. We would like to answer all the questions today. YASSER SEIRAWAN: Lubosh, I'm deferring to your better judgment, you being older and wiser. Go ahead; what do you think is going on here? LUBOMIR KAVALEK: Well, I think a few moves back this position occurred in my game against Portisch. In the seventies we played this game. He has conducted the same idea that Garry Kasparov is doing now; namely, he is trying to exchange light pieces, the knights, because he is going into some kind of squeezed position, and once you don't have so much space, it's a good idea to get some pieces exchanged. And obviously in this position it is to sort of negate the space advantage that white has. It's interesting that the computer played the move a4, because usually what we were trying to do is to conduct an attack on the king-side in this position. Without that move, with things opened up, it's very difficult with the line on the a-file. It opens, then it will be quite difficult to make some progress for white. YASSER SEIRAWAN: What happened in your game with Portisch? LUBOMIR KAVALEK: Draw. YASSER SEIRAWAN: Well, I knew you would know something about this line, it being a classical line, and you have to know your classics! DB MOVE: 20 Nxh4 MAURICE ASHLEY: Deep Blue has played Nxh4. Kasparov is away from the board at the moment. No doubt he's in the dressing room. He's quickly coming back to the board, and I think it's about two to one that he'll take the knight? YASSER SEIRAWAN: I think it's a good, good chance. MIKE VALVO: Quite a bit more than that, I'd say. GK MOVE: 20...Qxh4 YASSER SEIRAWAN: But actually, Lubosh, you did it very well by explaining that white has an advantage in space. And what we mean by that is white's pieces, especially the center pawns at d5 and e4, control more of black's side of the board. This puts black in a space squeeze. And so by exchanging pieces like we've just seen, black eases his cramp and makes it easier for him to play. Do you think it was a good idea, Lubosh, for Deep Blue to allow the trade of those knights? LUBOMIR KAVALEK: Well, it's very, very difficult. What else can be done? I remember that I tried to play a move like Nf5 at that moment, but it didn't go anywhere. I think that Kasparov basically is a King's Indian player. He's very familiar with this counterattacking setup, what he has now in this position. So it will be -- I don't think that he will have problems now. There's only three light pieces left on either side. YASSER SEIRAWAN: Thank you, Lubosh Kavalek. MAURICE ASHLEY: Well, this is indeed the kind of position that I think a human would love to have against a computer. Because there's no real tactics going on yet, and it doesn't even look like there's going to be any tactics, really, in the long-term. It's the kind of thing that you just have to look out for some kind of positional -- nothing easy for the computer to start mixing it up, and I'm somewhat surprised that they weren't careful enough in the programming to make sure that this kind of situation didn't happen. It just seems like what's Deep Blue going to be thinking about now. We saw it yesterday when it didn't have much to do, made very, very awkward, strange moves. Only when it found something to do in positions to open it up a little bit did it play well. You'd think it would go for that in the -- that in the beginning instead of letting the position already get controlled by Kasparov. YASSER SEIRAWAN: We do have a gentleman in the audience who really wants to ask us something. AUDIENCE MEMBER: I was just wondering really quickly if Nf5, black's king comes under attack, will recapture with the bishop and capture with the pawn, the -- white then has both bishops and what would be an opening up of the game. I wonder what the commentators say about that. Of course, black does not have to capture the knight, can move the queen instead, but I was wondering what you thought of those possibilities. YASSER SEIRAWAN: It's a legitimate question. What the gentleman had asked is what about the possibility of advancing the knight to the f5 square, which would induce the move Bxf5 exf5, when white has won the two bishops, and what is the overall assessment thereafter. Because the position is still closed, the advantage of the two bishops is negated. White maintains his spacial advantage, but I don't think at this particular position -- don't think that this particular position offers much opportunity for the advantage for the first player. But we may see something like this down the line. I just wanted to say what you had mentioned, Maurice, about the opening. And this is a dilemma, actually. In a sense, you're right, the computer programmers sit there and say, "Hey, look, we want our kind of chess, and our kind of chess is open, slashing, swashbuckling chess, and we know that the human player is going to try to close down the position and handcuff our wonderful program. How do we avoid it?" But the dilemma is, if you go through the opening books, over the course of many centuries -- DB MOVE: 21 Qe2 YASSER SEIRAWAN: We do have a move, by the way, Qd2-e2, just covering -- We will get to that in a moment. The dilemma that the computer programmers have is, look, they've got to follow this analysis, this body of encyclopedic wisdom that says, "This is the only way you can get the advantage." And so that's what Deep Blue has done. In this particular line, this is the way that white is supposed to play to get an advantage. It may not be the kind of position the programmers want, but the theory says this is what you have to do to get an advantage. By the way, I do like this last move for a very specific reason. If you noticed, the queen on d2 is vulnerable. What black would like to do is focus his power, his pieces against this pawn on h3. And what he could try to do is bring this knight to g5 followed by bringing the knight to f3, check, which would fork the white king and queen. So the move Qe2 dodged that potential move and at the same time sets up the idea of a4xb5 so that the b5 pawn will be weak. Let me just talk about this position for a moment for another reason. Former world chess champion Jose Raul Capablanca explained what the problem is for black in this position. The problem is that when you have a spatial disadvantage, as we see through the central pawns, it carries -- black's position carries what he called the seeds of defeat; that is to say, black could lose this game without making any mistakes. It's just that inherent in white's position is a powerful lock in the center which will carry an advantage right through the endgame. It's very, very hard to play a perfect game, but the idea is that white has a built-in advantage, if you will. Now, again, this isn't the kind of position that the computer can play very well, but I know -- and Mike, you can talk about this, too -- I know that the computer programmers over the course of the year have been doing their utmost to improve the positional play of Deep Blue.