About This Particular Macintosh
Prev Next
11.10 / October 2005
Download ATPM 11.10

Hardware Review

by Tom Bridge, tbridge@atpm.com

iPod nano 4 GB

excellent

Developer: Apple Computer

Price: $199 (2 GB); $249 (4 GB)

Requirements: Mac OS X 10.3.4 or Windows 2000 SP4, USB port

Recommended: USB 2.0

Trial: None

There it was, hiding in Steve’s watch pocket the whole presentation, and none of us saw it coming. The iPod nano is a testament to good design engineering. The best way to explain the size of the iPod nano is to ask someone to take out a business card and lay it flat on the table. It’s as long as the long edge of the card, and 2/3rds of the width. It’s smaller than a stack of 15 business cards. That right there is reason enough to consider shelling out for the iPod nano.

I saw the keynote and ogled at what Steve hath wrought with his incredible team of design and test engineers, and felt the technolust rising within me like the mercury on a Central Valley summer day. It was too much to behold. My old 3G iPod is approaching its end of life as the battery slowly and surely dies, and my Shuffle can’t hold but a quarter as much, so it was off to Pentagon City two days after Steve had announced the Nano.

ipod-nano-1

Taking it out of the box will cement with you just how small this technical marvel is. The packaging is along the same vein as the packaging for Apple’s other small technical wonder, the AirPort Express, featuring a box that opens much like a book to reveal the new member of your technical stable. It sits there, wrapped in the usual plastic skin that reads “Don’t Steal Music.”

Now, this is not your father’s iPod anymore: FireWire docking is sadly gone with this new machine, rendering all those FireWire dock cables you have lying around obsolete, fodder for Craiglist and eBay. It does, however, fit in an old 3G dock quite nicely, provided that you swap the dock connector for a USB 2.0 version. Of course, there are many who would object to such a transition, and I cannot say that I blame them. Few computers older than a year have a USB 2.0 port on them, leaving the user to suffer through transferring large files over a piddling USB 1.1 connection in its wake. This move is not lost on me, but I will say this: I do not mind seeing more companies adopt USB 2.0 as a decent serial standard. Perhaps this will encourage people like Canon and Nikon to consider adding it to their digital cameras for speedy downloading of images.

Once full of tunes, contacts, and calendars, I took my black Nano out for a spin. Sure enough, the sound quality astounds, once you drop the little white iPod earbuds in the nearest trash receptacle. Listening on my QuietComfort headphones, I was astounded by the depth of audio ranges, from thumping bass to crystal clear treble on all my recordings, from Switchfoot’s new CD to the Swedischer Rundfunkchor’s Brahms’ Requiem. One thing that has taken some getting used to is the location of the headphone jack, now ensconced on the bottom edge of the iPod next to the dock connector, causing me to hold it upside down the first time I grab it from my pocket. The tiny hold switch that sits atop the Nano is also something of a departure, I felt. It’s smaller and with less feedback than previous models, and I found myself having to stare at the iPod to search out the orange field behind the hold switch’s on position to make sure it was properly set.

ipod-nano-2

One thing to worry about as a purchaser of iPod accessories is which ones will work with the new Nano. Forget about the iTrip; there’s no remote switch. Forget about the FireWire charger for your car; that’s right out. Basically, there are a lot of changes, so don’t necessarily expect everything to work. Thankfully, the Internet being what it is, people are trying and will tell you what they find. Phil Torrone’s dissection of what what works and what does not is the most exhaustive search of devices that you might have that might not work.

Something new to the iPod nano, aside from its fresh color screen, is the ability to lock the screen of your iPod to outside influence, including prying eyes. So set up the lock, and protect your contacts and calendars from the random people who might put their grubby hands all over your iPod. Of course, your own grubby hands are another problem as the back of the iPod will look like a scene from CSI after the fingerprint crowd has been through, and beware of even breathing at your iPod’s screen, as that might well scratch it. (Despite what Apple says, I think it’s is more scratchable than other iPods’ screens.) Get a nifty case, and do yourself a big favor in the process.

I will say that this is the best iPod I’ve ever owned. Small, long-in-the-tooth-battery, good and visible color screen, and the ability to get lost in my jeans. It’s not perfect though, with an easy-to-scratch screen and the problem with the accessories not all working, but overall, if you’re in the market for a new iPod, give the Nano a look. You won’t regret it.



Reader Comments (14)


Jean-Jacques Cortes October 07, 2005 - 20:19 EST #
You said "My old 3G iPod is approaching its end of life as the battery slowly and surely dies" and you still continue to buy iPods ? This 3G iPod is only one year or two, it costed you a lot of money, and it can't be used after so few times because it's impossible to change the battery. The iPod is the biggest shame of all recent industry. It's like buying Kleenex at the price of sylk-made (and with gold lace) tissues .
I can't understand how Apple can sell so many iPods.
That's why I won't buy any iPod until it will be possible to change the battery by myself at a reasonable cost.

Tom Bridge (ATPM Staff) October 07, 2005 - 21:00 EST #
You CAN change the battery by yourself for a reasonable cost, JJ. A new battery for a 3rd gen iPod is $25 at NewerTech's website. Perhaps you should get out that credit card and pony up.

Jean-Jacques Cortes October 08, 2005 - 11:07 EST #
Ok, it's sound a good plan, but Apple doesn't give a lot of explanation about the reason why the battery has short life expectancy (around 1.500 hours as I read somewhere).

Tom Bridge (ATPM Staff) October 08, 2005 - 11:13 EST #
Because it's small and subject to odd discharge/recharge cycles? I mean, 2 years of constant charge/recharge cycles will take a toll on any small power cell.

Tim Knorr October 10, 2005 - 23:48 EST #
Firewire charging _is_ possible with the nano, just no synching.

Jean-Jacques Cortes October 13, 2005 - 08:55 EST #
And what do you think about the new iPod video (and the new iMac too) ?

Steve Rickard November 01, 2005 - 16:13 EST #
I am curious about the following comment you made regarding the Nano;"Forget about the FireWire charger for your car; that's right out." Apple specs for the Nano state that it supports IEEE charging and audio out. I currently use the Nano in my car with a firewire charger and audio out set up via a Sik Din dock adapter.

josh cadwell November 03, 2005 - 21:24 EST #
i am wondering what kind of ipod to buy wich one would last me the longest tho in the price range of 250$? i want a nano but i heard they break easly so i dont know wich one to get could u help me out

steven November 10, 2005 - 00:29 EST #
I just got my ipod nano for my birthday and it seems to be taking forever to charge...angerrr

Don't junk your cables yet November 14, 2005 - 17:12 EST #
Hang on to that car charger, the new ipods will still charge over firewire, a sometimes handy feature if you want to charge your pod without having to worry about unmounting it from your system.

Also my experience has been that it's no more scratchable than anything that highly polished and certainly doesn't seem to be any worse than any previous generation. The difference I think is that the higher resolution colour screen shows it up more. That and all the coverage "nano scratches" have had causing people to look harder for them.

Pick white, it's harder to notice scratches - oh and put a screen protector on. Even my cell phone has a screen protector.

rosas November 30, 2005 - 21:52 EST #
HI, i want to buy an ipod for christmas.
Wich one do you think is the better option? what are the main differences bettwen the nano and the 30G. Please help me!!!

Lee Bennett (ATPM Staff) November 30, 2005 - 23:39 EST #
Rosas - assuming you've already seen the prices and capacities of the various nano and full-size flavors, you might be wondering why the nano may only be roughly half the cost but have less than a tenth of the capacity.

The difference is twofold. 1) physical size. 2) method of storage.

The full-size iPod uses a hard drive whereas the nano uses flash memory. Presently, X amount of storage on a hard drive is far cheaper to produce than the same amount of storage in flash memory, but the memory is not susceptible to the affects of movement, shaking, or dropping like a hard drive-based iPod is.

Because the nano uses flash memory, that's why it can be offered as a much smaller device than the standard iPod.

Other than this, the iPods work exactly the same way. As for which would help you, it is a decision over getting a smaller and lighter iPod that doesn't have a hard drive to be concerned about—at the expense of having less capacity, or getting a larger and heavier iPod with a hard drive which, naturally, should be treated/handled like any other hard drive.

Josh Kurek December 01, 2005 - 17:15 EST #
So, finally the i pod bug bit me and now i want one for me and my girlfriend. The only thing that i am concerned about is i heard that the screens on the nanos dont work after a while is that true?

Tom Bridge (ATPM Staff) December 01, 2005 - 17:22 EST #
My nano is goin' strong to this day, Josh. They may scratch a bit (BUY A CASE!) but the screen keeps on ticking. They also have a 1 year warranty included plus extra if you buy the extended warranty.

Add A Comment

Full Name
E-Mail Address
will not be published
Comment  (You may use hyperlink, italic, and boldface tags. Use a blank line to start a new paragraph.)
E-mail me new comments on this article.
Prev Next
Copyright © 1995-2005 ATPM, Inc. <http://www.atpm.com/11.10/ipod-nano.shtml>