About This Particular Macintosh
Prev Next
Archives

Archives

About This Particular Outliner



Reader Comments (4)


Bo Clawson June 22, 2004 - 09:16 EST #
MORE obviously needed a successor when I moved to OSX, and finally in 2003, Inspiration updated to OSX.

http://www.inspiration.com

Inspiration doesn't have the presentation and some other features, but it certainly handles images and tree diagrams.

I find Inspiration invaluable to keep extensive sets of information which I can find easily in outline form (like this and Macintouch's series of comments on outliners).

Bo

Tobias Weber February 17, 2005 - 18:19 EST #
In the last few days I read the ATPO columns 2003.9 to 2005.2 and copied 71 sentences from the text and comments. Of these 15 were (mostly historic) facts new to me and 11 valuable IT wisdom. 12 listed cool features of extinct and 9 of available outliners.

5 regarded the philosophy of certain products and 19 were on the general principles of outlining. I think those 34% contain the goal you set yourself, and would have liked them even better with less reference to reality. People not used to outlining need pure theory to imagine their perfect tool.

Then they have to learn AppleScript to get it, by combining applications with little suport for data exchange :-(

So far my experince in using trial versions to compile the list above. I'm looking forward to reading more of yours!

Hank Roberts October 05, 2005 - 13:24 EST #
I'm very happy with ShadowPlan (which has both PDA and desktop computer support). www.codejedi.com

It's not MORE 3.11 -- which I still also use under Classic under OSX, because, like WordStar, my fingers know how to use it freeing my brain for thinking.

I wish more programmers also wrote piano music -- they'd understand that having consistent notation (clefs, bars, rests, notes, half notes, quarter notes) to tell what keys the fingers should hit and how is what makes the piano a really useful instrument.

Imagine if each piece of piano music you wanted to play used a different system of notation, and also required a different set of keystrokes to make a given sound.

That'd make a piano as hard to use as a computer is now -- switching between one program and another wastes a huge amount of brain effort.

On the piano, once you learn how, the keystrokes are run from spinal reflexes, faster than the conscious brain could possibly interpret and direct the fingers.

No chance of that with software.

bowerbird intelligentleman December 06, 2005 - 16:14 EST #
wordstar?
did you say wordstar?
you still using wordstar, hank?
where can i get a copy?

-bowerbird

Add A Comment

Full Name
E-Mail Address
will not be published
Comment  (You may use hyperlink, italic, and boldface tags. Use a blank line to start a new paragraph.)
E-mail me new comments on this article.
Prev Next
Copyright © 1995-2005 ATPM, Inc. <http://www.atpm.com/Back/atpo.shtml>