Being a novice player for 45+ years, because other things in my life were more important then hour upon hour of endless study of chess openings and endings, I never got really good at playing traditional chess.
Even though I worked at the UNITED STATES CHESS FEDERATION a few years and was surrounded by good and even GREAT players the study of chess was of secondary importance.
I did learn to play better by listening to the employees speak about taticts and strategies,
and what to, and not to do. It would be hard not to around those players.
Fischers thoughts are that the majority of modern chess matches are "prearranged". That is to say that player has chosen to use "SELECTED" openings in each of the games he will play as WHITE and knows what the expected lines of defense are from the other players past performances and how to avoid them. THUS he has largely already played the game.
Is put a rook on the first empty square on the first row,
the king on the second empty square on the first row,
and the other rook on the third empty square on the first row.
This procedure creates any of the possible 960 opening setups with equal chance,
hence is a good alternative for making the opening setup by computer.
On the average, you must make 6.7 die rolls. (More complicated tables, which would
yield less die rolls are possible. )
Is to to roll a position with a die, made by Michael Staiff. However, this method is not mathematically sound: some positions have more chance to be chosen as others. On the other hand, it decreases the probability that a knight starts in a corner, which may be a good thing.
Opening lines are useless as there are now 960 "new" opening setup positions and only the players knowledge of sound movements will have him prevail. (It will be a while before these will be "memorized".)