Though I am primarily a correspondence chess player, like most of us I
maintain an interest in the wider world of chess. I follow the big GM
tournaments, have my favorites among the OTB Grandmasters and have a particular
interest in the really big events ... World Championships, Super-GM
Tournaments, World Team Championships and the Chess Olympiads. With all the
flaws in the current OTB chess world (FIDE, World Champions) there is something
compelling about the meetings of these giants of the chess world. If I had to
choose a single major chess tournament to attend, I think I'd choose an
Olympiad.
But what about the chess? You'd expect to see some outstanding chess played at such an illustrious and important chess competition. But it is, after all, over-the-board chess ... |
By J. Franklin Campbell This particular Olympiad will be remembered for many things besides the quality of the chess. There was considerable controversy (even some talk of boycott) concerning the host city Elista, Kalmykia, the home of the even more controversial FIDE and Kalmyk President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov. There was the construction problems finishing "Chess City" in time for the Olympiad. In fact, the competition started two days late because of the hall not being ready, causing the cancellation of the final round and elimination of one free day. Some teams also encountered problems reaching Kalmykia, not exactly the center of the known universe. The British arbiter Harry Lamb left before the competition even started because of the weird housing provided. He described it as a sanitorium on the outskirts of the city. They had apparently just removed the patients. However, he said, " There were people in white coats everywhere" and he mentioned armed guards at the doors, not an environment conducive to concentration on chess matters. Perhaps the one move that will in the end overshadow all these problems is the one made by FIDE to charge for the game scores. They've been talking about copyrighting the games scores from FIDE-rated tournaments, but I don't think many people took them seriously. Now, however, they've made their first move. Instead of making the games freely available at their website, as has been typical with many major events in recent years, they've offered the games for USD 19.95 at their on-line store! There's little to stop anyone from asking a price for a service provided, but they also are forbidding others from transmitting the games over the Internet. I don't believe too many people believe they have a solid legal basis for this. It will certainly be interesting watching the fallout from this ... is this just the first step in eliminating the free circulation of chess game scores? However, as should be expected at a giant chess competition such as this with players of all strengths mixed together, not all the blunders were made "off the board." Here are two games that caught my attention. In the first round the powerful USA team faced an undermanned squad from Iran and presented them with a "bagel" (i.e., they beat them 4-0). Following is the game from Board 1.
White covers his a-pawn, offers to exchange the Queens and puts some pressure on the Black e-pawn. Without doing any actually analysis this move seems reasonable. However, would any cc player fail to check the obvious Qg4 check? 28. Qd2 or even 28. h3 would be much more reasonable. 28. ... Qg4+ 29.Kf1? What is this, an attempted self-mate? White has blocked the only square open to his Queen to protect against the Black Rook reaching White's first rank. 29. Kh1 Rc8 30. Qf1 Qf3+ 31. Kg1 Rc2 32. a3 looks good for Black but still leaves him with a lot of work. 29. ... Rc8 0-1 So we have an almost humorous final position where White's Queen is helpless. Well, the above game was from the first round, where we'd expect to see some mismatches and poor play from weak opposition. How about later, when the opponents would all be top players with astronomical Elo's?
First appearance would give the edge to White in this position. The material is equal but Black has the doubled pawns. However, Black does have a passed pawn and White's King position is more open to attack, so White needs to take some care. One interesting line: 37. Qd6 Qe1+ 38. Kh2 Rxf3 leading to a draw by perpetual check. Other unambitious moves, such as 37. Qg1, seem to avoid problems. 37.Qa7? g4 38.Bxg4 Of course, 38. hxg4 Rd4 leads to a lost game as well. 38. ... Rf1+ 39.Kh2 Qe1 0-1 And, just like that, it's forced mate! |
Note: this feedback feature has been disabled. If you have any comments on this review, please send them for posting on the Readers' Comments page. Send your remarks to: E-mail Your Views! |
Home | On the Square Menu | Previous Article | Next Article |
Webmaster: J. Franklin Campbell
Contact Webmaster