News.com Mobile
for PDA or phone
Login: Forgot password? | Sign up
advertisement

How wikis are changing our view of the world

By Daniel Terdiman
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
November 15, 2005 4:00 AM PT

Moments after the eye of Hurricane Katrina made landfall along the Gulf Coast on Aug. 29, news agencies everywhere rushed to report the story. But among the quickest to begin offering comprehensive coverage wasn't a formal news organization at all.

Instead, it was a loose collection of self-appointed "citizen journalists" reporting, linking and photographing from Louisiana and around the world. And the organization for which they were working, called Wikinews, wasn't paying them a dime.

"With all of that bad news, it's nice to know that at least one cool thing has emerged from this: The Katrina Information Map, which brings together the power of wikis and Google Maps to create a useful public resource for tracking or reporting flood damage," former Louisianan Matt Barton wrote on the blog Kairosnews. "I see that most people are using the service to inquire about loved ones or report flooding on various streets."

Something wiki
this way comes

A wiki is a group of Web pages that allows users to add content, as on an Internet forum, but also allows others (often completely unrestricted) to edit the content. Wiki is sometimes interpreted as the acronym for "what I know, is," which describes the knowledge contribution, storage and exchange up to some point. "Wiki" with an uppercase W and WikiWikiWeb are both used to refer specifically to the first wiki ever created (March 25, 1995). The name is based on the Hawaiian term wiki, meaning "quick," "fast" or "to hasten."

--Source: Wikipedia

News is one of the most effective uses of an oddly named technology created in 1995 by a Portland, Ore., programmer named Ward Cunningham, which was based on the idea that information should be shared openly and remain accountable to everyone. Known as "wiki," the software allows the creation of Web pages that can be edited indefinitely by anyone with access, regardless of who wrote the original work.

Although initially conceived as a form of communal publishing, the wiki is quickly evolving into a multipurpose interactive phenomenon. As evidenced in the aftermath of Katrina and the London bombings a month earlier, wikis can be a life-saving resource that provides real-time collaboration, instant grassroots news and crucial meeting places where none exist in the physical world.

The popularity and proliferation of wikis are particularly significant in an age of increasing distrust of mainstream media. In many ways, wikis are emblematic of the democratizing principles of the Information Age that seek to give voice to ordinary citizens.

"With the distributed nature of the Internet, you now have the ability for people with common interests to rapidly aggregate themselves and apply their nearly unbounded knowledge of different subjects into cohesive organization in a matter of hours," said Rob Kline a product manager for Marchex who helped create the KatrinaHelp.info wiki. "Because it's distributed, it's global, so when I have to go to sleep, someone else can pick it up and keep working on it."

Wikis began in various forms, but it was the online encyclopedia known as Wikipedia that propelled the concept into the popular consciousness. Wikipedia and Wikinews were created by the same nonprofit organization, Wikimedia Foundation, and are available free of charge.

 Wiki while you work

Online collaboration tools are changing the way individuals and companies share information.

Click here to watch video

As an indication of Wikipedia's growth, the open-source encyclopedia tallied more than 814,000 articles as of this writing, in English alone. Although Wikipedia undoubtedly owes at least some of its popularity to the pursuit of trivia that is a hallmark of the Web, it has also fundamentally altered societal attitudes about access to information.

For all its benefits, some worry that those who participate in sites like Wikipedia or Wikinews are more interested in pursuing an agenda or personal opinions than the kind of accurate documentation expected of professionally edited resources like the Encyclopedia Britannica.

Continued: From weddings to Dungeons & Dragons...

Post your comments on this report here

Taking back the Web: Day 1
Taking back the Web: Day 2
Taking back the Web: Day 3
Taking back the Web: Day 4
Taking back the Web: Day 5
Taking back the Web: The law of spontaneous order
Reader wiki
Talkback
Podcast

Related news
News From Around the Web

Mapping places in Wikipedia
Search Engine Watch

Wikis, Weblogs and RSS: What does the new Internet mean for business?
Knowledge@Wharton -- free registration required

Can you trust Wikipedia?
Poynter Online

Wiki wars
Red Herring -- free registration required

Editors: Mike Yamamoto, Desiree Everts
Design: Michelle White
Production: Mike Markovich, Andrew Lottmann


Continued ...

CNET.com
Copyright ©2005 CNET Networks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | About CNET Networks | Jobs | Terms of Use