The Chess Seesaw

Edward Winter


seesaw

Chess Chatter & Chaff by P.H. Williams (Stroud, 1909), page 72


Some lesser-known specimens of the seesaw (or windmill) combination are presented.

J. Brach – J. Ritter von Pessler
Third SSZ international correspondence tourney (1910-1912)
Queen’s Gambit Declined

1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 Nc3 c5 4 cxd5 exd5 5 Nf3 Nc6 6 g3 Be6 7 Bg2 Nf6 8 O-O h6 9 b3 Be7 10 Bb2 O-O 11 e3 Qb6 12 dxc5 Qxc5 13 Ne2 Rad8 14 a3 Ne4 15 Rc1 Qb6 16 Ned4 Bg4 17 Nxc6 bxc6 18 Qd4 Qxd4 19 Nxd4 Nd2 20 Nxc6 Bg5 21 Nxd8 Nxf1 22 Nxf7 Nxe3 23 Nxg5 Nxg2

dia01

24 Rc7 hxg5 25 Rxg7+ Kh8 26 Rxa7+ Kg8 27 Rg7+ Kh8 28 Rxg5+ Kh7 29 Rg7+ Kh6 30 Rxg4 Kh5 31 Rd4 and White won (Black being mated at move 55).

Source: Schweizerische Schachzeitung, July 1913, pages 107-108.

B. de Oliveira and M. Kiss – R. Réti and L. Vianna
Rio de Janeiro, 10 February 1925
Alekhine’s Defence

1 e4 Nf6 2 e5 Nd5 3 c4 Nb6 4 b3 d6 5 Bb2 dxe5 6 Bxe5 Nc6 7 Bb2 Bf5 8 d4 e6 9 Be2 Bb4+ 10 Kf1 Qd7 11 c5 Nd5 12 a3 Bxb1 13 axb4 Bg6 14 b5 Ncb4 15 Qd2 O-O 16 Nf3 Qe7 17 h4 Qf6 18 h5 Be4 19 Ng5 Bxg2+ 20 Kxg2 Nf4+ 21 Kf1 Qxg5 22 Rg1 Qf5 23 d5 Qh3+ 24 Ke1 Nbd3+ 25 Bxd3 Nxd3+

dia02

26 Qxd3 Resigns.

Source: American Chess Bulletin, March 1925, page 60.

dia03

J.H. Zukertort – N.N., London, 1879. White played 21 Nxg4 Bxg4 22 Qxg4 Qxg4 23 Rxf7+ Kg8 24 Rxc7+ Kf8 25 Rf7+ Kg8 26 Rxb7+ Kf8 27 Rf7+ Kg8 28 Rxa7+ Kf8 29 Rf1+ Nf6 30 Rxa8+ Kg7 31 exf6+ Kg6 32 Rxh8 Resigns.

Source: Chess Monthly, January 1881, page 153.

A game from page 236 of the September 1957 BCM:

C. Chaurang (France) – B.J. Moore (England)
International Junior Team Tournament, The Hague, 15 July 1957
Sicilian Defence

1 e4 c5 2 d4 cxd4 3 Nf3 Nc6 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Nc3 d6 6 Bg5 e6 7 Qd2 a6 8 O-O-O h6 9 Bf4 e5 10 Nxc6 bxc6 11 Bxe5 Bg4 12 Bxf6 Qxf6 13 Be2 Be6 14 f4 Be7 15 Rhe1 O-O 16 Bf3 Rab8 17 e5 dxe5 18 fxe5 Qh4 19 Ne4 Bd5 20 Kb1 Qxh2 21 Re2 Qxe5 22 Nc3

dia04

22…Rxb2+ 23 Kxb2 Rb8+ 24 Ka1 Ba3 25 Rxe5 Bb2+ 26 Kb1 Bxc3+ 27 Kc1 Bb2+ 28 Kb1 Bxe5+ 29 Kc1 Bb2+ 30 Kb1 Bc3+ 31 Kc1 Bxd2+ 32 White resigns.

On page 295 of the November 1957 BCM D.J. Morgan quoted W. Ritson Morry’s view in the Chess Supporter that this game surpassed Torre v Lasker, Moscow, 1925, for the following reasons:

‘(a) The pieces which enable the discovered check seesaw to be operated are not on the immediate scene as in the Torre game.

(b) Two sacrifices, and not one, are necessary to make the plan work properly.

(c) The quiet 24th move by the king’s bishop was not easy to foresee.

(d) The operation extends over a much greater area of the board and is accomplished with much greater concealment of intention.’

José Antonio Fabiano Mendes (Rio de Janeiro) submitted the following game in C.N. 2911:

Helgi Olafsson – Jon Viktor Gunnarsson
Iceland, 1999
Queen’s Gambit Declined

1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 Nf3 Nf6 4 Nc3 dxc4 5 a4 Be6 6 Ng5 Bd5 7 e4 h6 8 exd5 hxg5 9 dxc6 Nxc6 10 d5 Na5 11 Bxg5 Qb6 12 Qc2 Qb4 13 Rd1 O-O-O 14 Be2 g6 15 Qd2 Bg7 16 O-O a6 17 Qe3 Rhe8 18 Bf3 Kb8 19 Rfe1 Nb3 20 d6 exd6 21 Qf4 Rxe1+ 22 Rxe1 Nc5 23 Bxf6 Nd3

dia05

24 Bxd8 Nxf4 25 Re8 Ka7 26 a5 Bd4 27 Bc7 Bxf2+ 28 Kf1 Qxb2 29 Bb8+ Ka8 30 Bxd6+ Ka7 31 Bb8+ Resigns.

Of the games involving P.W. Sergeant that we have reviewed, one of the most interesting is this loss:

Singapore (J.B. Elcum, W. Craig, S. Rosembaum and P.A. Reutens) – Hong Kong (P.W. Sergeant, T.H. Reid, M.J. Dannenberg, E.J. Moses and P.C. de Souza)
Telegraph game, 1902
King’s Gambit Declined

1 e4 e5 2 f4 exf4 3 Nf3 g5 4 h4 g4 5 Ng5 h6 6 Nxf7 Kxf7 7 d4 f3 8 gxf3 Be7 9 Bc4+ d5 10 Bxd5+ Kg7 11 O-O g3 12 f4 Nf6 13 Nc3 h5 14 f5 Ng4 15 Kg2 Bxh4 16 Rf4 Nf2 17 Qf3 Qg5 18 e5 Nc6 19 f6+ Kg6 20 Ne4 Nxe5 21 Nxg5 Nxf3 22 Bf7+ Kxg5

dia06

The Singapore team now telegraphed the unusual seesaw line 23 Rxf3+ Kg4 24 Rf4+ Kg5 25 Rxf2+ Kg4 26 Rf4+ Kg5 27 Rf1+ Kg4 28 Bc4 Re8 29 f7, and Black resigned.

Source: La Stratégie, 17 September 1902, pages 277-278. The magazine took the score and notes by J.B. Elcum from the Singapore Free Press.

The following position was labelled ‘D. Harrwitz Date? Before 1858’ on page 430 of the November 1913 issue of La Stratégie:

dia07

White, to move, is said to have won thus: 1 Rxg7 Rxd1 2 Rxe7+ Kg8 3 Rg7+ Kh8 4 Rxd7+ Kg8 5 Rg7+ Kh8 6 Rxc7+ Kg8 7 Rg7+ Kh8 8 Rxb7+ Kg8 9 Rxb8+ Kh7 10 Rh8+ Kg6 11 Rg8+ Kh7+ 12 Rg7+ Kh8 13 Rxg5+ Kh7 14 Rg7+ Kh8 15 Rxa7+ Kg8 16 Rxa6 Rxf1+ 17 Kg2.

Next is a spectacular odds game won by Amos Burn which Richard Forster took from pages 289-290 of the July 1896 BCM and presented in his article ‘Quiet Master in Stormy Waters’ on pages 12-13 of CHESS, July 2001:

Amos Burn – G. Whitehead
Liverpool, 1896
(Remove White’s queen’s knight.)

1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bc4 Be7 4 d4 exd4 5 c3 d6 6 Qb3 Ne5 7 Nxe5 dxe5 8 Bxf7+ Kf8 9 O-O Nf6 10 f4 Qd6 11 fxe5 Qxe5 12 Bf4 Qxe4 13 Rae1 Qc6 14 Bg5 Qb6 15 Rxf6 Qxb3

dia08

16 Bh5+ gxf6 17 Bh6+ Kg8 18 Rxe7

dia09

18…Qe6 (Mason: ‘Or 18...Be6 19 Rg7+ Kf8 20 Rxc7+ Kg8 21 Rg7+ Kf8 22 Rxb7+ Kg8 23 Rg7+ Kf8 24 Rxa7+ and mates in three more moves. Either way, a very remarkable and beautiful ending.’) 19 Rg7+ Kf8 20 Rd7+ Kg8 21 Rd8+ and mates next move.

Finally, the position below was published in an article by Josef Krejcik on pages 41-42 of the February 1925 Wiener Schachzeitung:

dia10

White wins as follows: 1 Rxg7+ Kh8 2 Rxf7+ Kg8 3 Rg7+ Kh8 4 Rxe7+ Kg8 5 Rg7+ Kh8 6 Rxd7+ Kg8 7 Rg7+ Kh8 8 Rxc7+ Kg8 9 Rg7+ Kh8 10 Rxb7+ Kg8 11 Rg7+ Kh8 12 Rxa7+ Kg8 13 Rg7+ Kh8 14 Rxg6+ Kh7 15 Rg7+ Kh8 16 Rxg5+ Kh7 17 Rg7+ Kh8 18 Rxg4+ Kh7 19 Rg7+ Kh8 20 Rxg3+ Kh7 21 Rg7+ Kh8 22 Rxg2+ Kh7 23 Rg7+ Kh8 24 Rxg1+ Kh7 25 Rg7+ Kh8 26 Kxa1 Nh7 27 Rg6+ Nf6 28 Rxh6+ Kg7 29 Rxf6.

dia11

This composition was also given by Krejcik on pages 41-42 of his book Artige und unartige Kinder der Schachmuse (Leipzig, 1925).

windmill

In C.N. 3301 Yvette Seirawan (Amsterdam) asked about the origins of ‘windmill’ and ‘seesaw’ as English-language terms for the combination known in German as ‘Zwickmühle’.

‘Seesaw’ was used by Steinitz (‘a pretty so-called seesaw of checks finishes the game’) when annotating his loss against James McConnell in New Orleans, 1886, which was presented as a ‘hitherto unpublished game’ on pages 250-251 of the September 1897 American Chess Magazine. Earlier occurrences of the term are sought.

Zwickmühle was Nimzowitsch’s word in Mein System, but the extent of its prior use has yet to be ascertained, another open matter being the first appearance of ‘windmill’ in chess literature. The English translation, My System, put ‘seesaw’.

The meaning of Zwickmühle is not ‘windmill’ but ‘double mill’, i.e. the term used in Mühlespiel (the board game known in English as Nine Men’s Morris). In his book Brettspiele der Völker (Berlin, 1931) Emanuel Lasker had (on pages 232-234) a section about Mühle, including references to Zwickmühle. As regards chess, Tim Krabbé devoted a chapter to ‘The art of the zwickmühle’ on pages 122-147 of Chess Curiosities (London, 1985). For complementary information, see pages 85-107 of the same author’s Nieuwe Schaakkuriosa (Amsterdam, 1977).

The German expression ‘in der Zwickmühle sitzen’ is translated by our dictionary as ‘to be in a catch-22 situation’ and ‘to be in a dilemma’. This figurative meaning is lost in ‘windmill’ and ‘seesaw’.






To the Chess Notes main page.

To the Archives for other feature articles.



Copyright 2007 Edward Winter. All rights reserved.