Home Shop
Chess Books Software
Magazine Chess
Sets & Boards Computers
Reviews Ornate
Sets Equipment
|
|
Contact Links
Map Calendar
Britbase Bound
Volumes Bridge
Go Backgammon
Poker Other
Games
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
BCM Chess Book Reviews : July 2001Return to the BCM Review Index
| Search for other BCM reviews by keyword
| More about BCM...
|
This book contains Korchnois own selection of his best 50 games
with the white pieces; a second volume is to follow with 50 more where
he had Black. The games were selected evenly from the fifty years that
he has been playing top-level chess. One gets the impression that the
restless Korchnoi could get very bored writing a book and he deliberately
seeks to alleviate that by choosing games with a variety of different
opening systems and opponents. Also, he has a chatty style and says that
he threw out games if they did not contain any conversational
fragments to disclose to the reader.
Quality of the games was not the top priority
for his selection, but, with so many to choose from, the reader need not
worry. They can hardly fail to entertain, and Korchnois notes are
spiced with his playfully wicked sense of humour. Dont expect to
find examples of seamless attacks and smooth positional masterpieces here;
many of the games are flawed struggles which reflect the attritional nature
of grandmaster chess.
Lifelong enemies can expect no more mercy
in its pages than can his chessboard opponents. Amongst the notes to the
three Karpov games, Korchnoi retells the tale of his being an unwanted
challenger and a foreigner in his own country during the 1970s and implies
that Karpov was little more than a well-schooled automaton to whom the
massed ranks of Soviet grandmasterhood had to dictate their best theoretical
ideas. But, albeit grudgingly, Korchnoi speaks of Karpov as the most
practical champion in the history of chess and admits to learning
from him about how to economise on time and energy.
Korchnoi is the last of the great war-horses
of the 1950s who can still play 2600+ standard chess and take on the very
best players in the world. It is clear from his annotations that he prepares
hard for every battle and uses a computer to help him do so. He is not
an indiscriminate fan of silicon assistance, however: I do not think
computerised commentaries à la Hübner or Khalifman
are an adornment to chess, or that they are useful to chess players. A
player should develop his tactical intuition, whereas catalogues of variations
try to replace this with a total calculation of the possibilities.
Korchnoi also clearly revels in opportunities to wrongfoot database-dependent
youngsters, recycling long-forgotten but still potent ideas from the days
when an Informator was a delegation member who reported back to
the Soviet Chess Federation what you got up to on tournament rest days.
Korchnoi maintains his freshness by playing
the man as much as the board, and giving in to his own moods and whims
both to amuse himself and flummox his opponents. The notes are a good
place for settling old scores (which would have made a good title for
the book). He also brings jesuitical zeal to bear against youngsters.
The hype surrounding Ponomariov provokes him to some wonderfully cruel
humour: I was no child prodigy, he grumbles, repeating the
first note from game one of the book, ... but nevertheless I have
had to measure swords with numerous young grandmasters. By way of passing
on experience, of course...
Ken Neats translation reads very well
in English, and he even gets a credit from the author for improving on
some of the analysis in one game. The humour might have been drier had
he edited out the countless exclamation marks with which jokes are drilled
home. This work is one of the few that deserves to sit on the shelf alongside
such classics as Fischers Sixty Memorable Games and Tals
Life and Games. In fact, it should probably take pride of place
as it is likely to be of far more practical use to the vast majority of
chess players who, like the author, would not claim to be chess geniuses.
Although we know he is, of course.
Genna Sosonkos recent book Russian
Silhouettes was a nostalgic celebration of the golden age of Soviet
chess, but a tad depressing when one considers that all the people he
was writing about are now dead (or gone off to play tennis). This book
is a reminder that there is still one live dinosaur out there in Caissic
Park. And hes still got very sharp teeth.
This substantial book is a translation of the 1976 Dutch edition. It
includes many critical games from throughout Euwes career with 50
annotated by Euwe himself and a good selection of photographs. The appearance
is neat and tidy, but it is spoilt by the use of a small typeface which
makes for hard reading try the continual text on pages 173-189
for example.
That Euwe was a major figure in chess history
is not in doubt; he was one of the best players in the world in the 1930s,
a prolific and successful author, the founder of the modern Dutch chess
tradition and an diplomatic president of FIDE who, mirabile dictu,
saw his duty to preside dispassionately and fairly for the benefit of
chess players everywhere without a thought of personal aggrandisement
or gain.
This biography is much like the Dutch world
champion (1935-7) himself thorough, honest and workmanlike. And
yet there is a feeling of disappointment. Euwe was an enigmatic and complex
personality. Why for example did he, a Doctor of Mathematics, teach
apparently quite contentedly in a girls secondary school?
Why did he not when World Champion become a full-time professional?
Why did Euwe always a busy man play in many small tournaments
well below his class and often do relatively badly?
Münninghoff writes (p.31): When
looking back, many people who have had dealings with Euwe over the course
of many years were forced to the conclusion, sometimes to their own surprise,
that they appeared not to have really known him after all. Münninghoff
too has had the same problem. He seems in awe of his great countryman
and has written an excellent chess history rather than a biography. Nonetheless
it is a worthy tribute to a very worthy man.
OUT OF PRINT |
This is the second of a two-volume work (the first was reviewed in BCM,
September 2000, page 478), completing a collection of Botvinniks
games up to the end of his playing career in 1970. There are nearly 600
games in this volume, each of which has been annotated in Informators
languageless style. The annotations are extensive, with attributions (very
often Botvinnik himself) and modern-day opening references included (up
to the year 2000). There are opening and player indexes, and each competition
Botvinnik played in is accompanied by a crosstable or statistical data.
This is a superb reference work with excellent production values. We noticed
just one slip-up, with Littlewood P listed as a player at
Hastings 1961/2 (he was aged less than five at the time: the true identity
of the player was his father Littlewood J).
This book is sub-titled The Ever-Popular 4 Qc2"; it covers lines
for both colours after 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 e6 3 Nc3 Bb4 4 Qc2. Curiously missing
from the bibliography is Nimzo-Indian Classical Defence by Ivan
Sokolov, published by Cadogan (i.e. the same publisher before it changed
its name) in 1995. However a comparison of the books shows that time has
marched on in this popular variation of the Nimzo-Indian, which has the
reputation of being one of the soundest ways Black has available to counter
1 d4. The format is Everymans tried and trusted one: a selection
of games (in this case, 84 of them) annotated and arranged in a logical
sequence. Lalic is a diligent, no-frills author and, after a short consideration
of the Classical Nimzo as played by world champions of the past, he presents
a rigorously modern selection of material. More than 60 pages are devoted
to lines beginning with the more modern 4...d5, less than 50 on 4...00
and 12 pages on the less fashionable 4...c5. All in all, a very thorough
work on a substantial and important area of opening theory.
Most opening book blurbs boast a list of world champions that have utilised
the opening contained between the covers and this is no exception. 11
of the first 13 world champions have played the Slav at some time in their
careers. It is not hard to see why; it is a very solid response for Black,
and yet, unlike so many other solid defences, it tends not
to hem in Blacks pieces but allows the attacking player to respond
actively. It allows a myriad of transpositional possibilities. This is
often a stumbling block for an opening book writer, but fortunately here
it is in the hands of the dependable Graham Burgess, who is particularly
adept at cross-referencing transpositions. He has produced a superbly
clear and practical guide to a complex and wide-ranging opening, mainly
in terms of variations but with textual advice when appropriate. Note
that coverage does not include the Semi-Slav, an opening system in its
own right.
The publishers of Informator have put together a collection of
games played by the worlds twelve top rated players plus
one other, in this case Judit Polgar for the period July-December
2000, and collected all the games they played during this period into
individual chapters. Each players chapter starts with a short biographical
summary, and presents each game chronologically, without commentary or
annotations. That takes up about 100 pages: note that Kasparovs
games during the period consisted solely of his 15 Braingames encounters
with Kramnik and that the same games appear in Kramniks chapter.
This is true for all games played between the top 12 plus one.
There follows a 50-page statistical appraisal
of each player in turn, listing their scores within opening category.
Forty pages of opening theory follow, concentrating on systems that were
in vogue during the period. This section of the book, written by Dusan
Rajkovic, includes substantial textual and symbolic annotations. A remarkably
inexpensive book with plenty of games, but the gratuitous repetition of
game scores and sparsity of annotations does rather detract from the overall
impression.
In this book, the well-known founder and editor of The Week In Chess
(TWIC) web site sets out to review the range of chess web sites, give
advice on how and where to play chess online, and suggest how chess players
can use the web to improve their practical play. It is very interesting
to see how Crowther sizes up what is available out there in the ether.
The attributes that have brought him to prominence as a purveyor of chess
news on the internet are much in evidence; he is informative, to the point
and rigorously objective, even when dealing with web sites which he might
consider to be rivals of his own. There is invaluable advice in admirably
plain English on the basics of computing, including how to connect to
the net and use email effectively. For the more advanced (and for any
Crowther wannabees), the author reveals much of the philosophy,
and many of the techniques and software packages, that underpin his news
site. His technical understanding and long experience of the internet
give great authority to his views. Anyone considering whether to invest
in an internet connection, or thinking of setting up a chess web site,
would do well to read this book.
This book attempts to apply various psychological and analytical techniques
to the thought processes involved in playing chess. It follows Jonathan
Levitts Genius in Chess and Jonathan Rowsons Seven
Deadly Chess Sins, which has been reappraised by Levitt elsewhere
in the June issue of BCM. Levitt also contributes the foreword
to this new book. It is based on Jan Przewozniks magazine articles
on chess thinking and has been translated and in many cases rewritten
by Marek Soszynski. Early in the book one is pitched into some heavy academic
text, exhorting the reader to think aloud. There is a very complex scoring
system which looks harder to understand and apply than chess itself. The
last section of the book deals with areas of psychology that management
trainees may be familiar with, e.g. creative thinking, stress management,
character development, positive self-image.The book contains lots of exercises
to test various aspects of your thinking, but the reader may well be turned
off very early by the quantity of techno-speak. Some might
find this sort of analysis useful, but most will find it desperately hard
work and lacking in the fun department.
The small advantages of the title include material, positional
and also psychological ones. The book is made up of nine chapters on such
subjects as strengths and weaknesses of opposite-coloured bishops, and
rook versus two minor pieces, and consists of annotated segments of games,
many of which will be very familiar, up-to-date to 2000. A good read for
the club player, though the price tag seems a little steep for a book
of only 144 pages.
SUPERSEDED BY A NEW EDITION - CLICK HERE |
The first edition of this
CD-ROM collection of correspondence chess games was reviewed in BCM
in October 1999. This is a brand-new 2001
edition, bringing it fully up-to-date with more than 350,000 good quality
correspondence and email games (available in old and new Chessbase formats
as well as PGN and Chess Assistant), of which about 10% are annotated.
In addition, you will find a cornucopia of data, information, interviews,
book reviews, even complete books relating to correspondence chess, including
the last four years worth of Chess Mail in PDF (Adobe Acrobat)
format, so that you see the magazine exactly as it appears on paper; a
suitable reader for this is supplied on the disk.