Staunton Beats a Saint

Submitted by billwall on Thu, 08/16/2007 at 10:35pm.

In March-April 1843, Howard Staunton, the best player in England, decided to play Pierre Charles Fournier de Saint Amant, the best player in France.  It was a casual match, held in London, of six games and the prize money was one guinea.  Saint Amant won the match with 3 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses.  Saint Amant returned to France, claiming it was a formal match, and that he proved he was better than Staunton.  Staunton claimed it was a casual match and that he wanted a re-match and a formal match where the winner would be the first one to win 11 games, draws not counting.  The return match was held in Paris in November-December, 1843, and Staunton won with 11 wins, 6 losses, and 4 draws.  The very first game of the London match featured an interesting and complicated rook and pawn endgame.  Saint Amant lost it, but should have drawn the endgame.  Staunton won it, but missed better moves that could have won it more easily.  Both sides had chances to win, lose, or draw this endgame. 

 

» posted in Endgames

Comments:

by Dannyh3065 - 5 months ago
Bronx, NY United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 9
That game was really sloppy, white should have won or atleast draw but not lose.
by Phobetor - 5 months ago
Eindhoven Netherlands
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 379
The question is: Does 20. Ke6 instead draw or not? In the game the extra tempo would have helped alot, since then 28... f1=Q 29. d8=Q seems to be pretty drawish.
by Pavrey - 5 months ago
Mumbai India
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 146
White has dilly-dallied when he had the chance to press forward with the king. A drawish game lost by white.
by sk8erkid - 5 months ago
west palm beach, fl United States
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 352
ya

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.