In May 1997 human chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov lost a historic match against IBM's chess computer Deep Blue. In the decisive last round Kasparov was a psychic wreck, resulting in resignation at move 19.
The opening in this game (Kasparov being Black):
1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Nd7 5. Ng5 Ngf6 6. Bd3 e6 7. N1f3 h6
and now White played the sacrifice 8.Nxe6 after which Kasparov completely collapsed.
This Zillions game was designed in memoriam of Nxe6.
 
All rules of normal chess apply, however, the board is colored in three different blues. Besides the normal checkmating Black has another winning way: If for one of the three colors White does not have any piece on a square of this color, he has lost immediately.
This condition counts even higher than the normal 'checkmating': If in the same moment Black is checkmated and White has no piece on one of the blues then White has lost.
Square e6 is a key spot. If White places a knight on it he has won immediately.
 
In the beginning Black has to be very careful to prevent white Knights from a ride against e6. The more pieces White looses (also by exchanges) the more difficult it will become for him to keep all three 'blues' under control.
 
In general Black should have better winning chances. I as a human find it most enjoyable to take the black side - fighting against white Zillions.
 
 
"Deep Blue versus Kasparov" is a special variant of my other game "Chess on the Rainbows".