Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1213-1214 (31 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39589.396840.94
Margaret McCartney, general practitioner
1 Glasgow
Margaret@margaretmccartney.com
Clinical trials are sometimes stopped prematurely if they show early benefit. But this might pose a risk to patients, says Margaret McCartney
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
"Major trial stopped early because results so good"—such urgent, feel good headlines about the latest medical breakthrough make for an eye catching health story. Cancer and HIV drug trials seem especially susceptible to a high media profile when there is talk of a newly discovered advantage.
The impression that this is happening more often is borne out by a recent study published in Annals of Oncology by Trotta and colleagues.1 The research team looked for all published clinical trials of cancer drugs in the past 11 years that were stopped early after an interim analysis found benefits. Over half of the 25 trials they identified were published in the past three years (2005–7).
Is this something to be concerned about? Surely an effective drug needs to be licensed and made available to as many people as possible, as quickly as possible. People who are seriously ill cannot wait for tedious
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+