Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1215 (31 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.a170
Iona Heath, general practitioner, London
iona.heath@dsl.pipex.com
Proposals arising out of Lord Darzis review of the NHS risk endangering the care of children in general practice
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
An illness or accident that kills or permanently disables a previously healthy child is a shocking and terrible thing. Such a possibility creates a continual undercurrent of dread familiar to every parent. The dramatic fall in the mortality rate among children in rich countries has been one of the great achievements of modern society and modern medicine, but the fear remains.
It is this context that informs some of the proposals emerging in the regional responses to the junior health minister Ara Darzis "next stage review" of the NHS. These are being published in quick succession by each region in England through May and June. An early example is that from the Yorkshire and the Humber Strategic Health Authority, entitled Healthy Ambitions (www.healthyambitions.co.uk). Its proposals are organised as eight "pathways," one of which is the "childrens pathway."
There is much that is good among the proposals, not least
CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+