Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1270 (7 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.39598.494942.DB
Bob Burton
1 Hobart
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The Australian government is considering further regulation of the $A2bn (£970m; 1.2bn; $1.9bn) a year complementary medicines industry after a consumer group raised concerns that products are promoted despite a lack of independently assessed evidence on their effectiveness.
In May the Australian Consumers Association published a general overview of the studies of glucosamine to treat osteoarthritis. The association concluded that some glucosamine products were at best on a par with a placebo and at worst ineffective. Australian consumers are estimated to spend approximately $A49m on these supplements a year.
Symbion Health, a company that markets a range of glucosamine products, reacted angrily by running an advertisement titled "Glucosamine: the facts made simple" in newspapers throughout the country. The advertisement claimed that "extensive research proves there can be a significant benefit" in using glucosamine for osteoarthritis. Its claims are based on a study in the Annals of Pharmacotherapy (2005 Apr 26;
CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+