BMJ  2006;333:1251-1256 (16 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39050.597350.47

Clinical Review

Osteoporosis and its management

¹ Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ

Fractures caused by osteoporosis affect one in two women and one in five men over the age of 50, resulting in an estimated annual cost to the health services of around £1.8bn (2.7bn; $3.5bn) in the United Kingdom and 30bn in all of Europe.^{1 2} Most patients with osteoporosis are managed in primary care, but a minority will benefit from referral to specialised centres. In recent years considerable advances have been made both in the identification of people at high risk of fracture and in therapeutic options to reduce the risk of fracture. This review focuses on these areas and also on the partnership that is required between primary and secondary care to optimise the management of patients with osteoporosis.

What is osteoporosis?

Osteoporosis results from reduced bone mass and disruption of the micro-architecture of bone (fig 1), giving decreased bone strength and increased risk of fracture, particularly of the spine, hip, wrist, humerus, and pelvis. The risk of fractures increases steeply with age (fig 2) and most of those affected are over 75.^{1 2} Globally, osteoporotic fractures caused an estimated 5.8 million disability adjusted life years in the year 2000^w1 and are also associated with increased mortality. Hip fractures (fig 3) result in loss of independence for at least a third of people with osteoporosis, and vertebral fractures (fig 4) cause height loss, chronic pain, and difficulty with normal daily activities.

View larger version (84K): [in this window] [in a new window] [PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]   Fig 1 Scanning electron micrographs to show the structure of L3 vertebra in a 31 year old woman (top) and in a 70 year old woman (bottom). Note that many of the plate-like structures have become converted to thin rods

 

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window] [PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]   Fig 2 Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Reprinted with permission28

 

View larger version (65K): [in this window] [in a new window] [PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]   Fig 3 Fracture of the femoral neck

 

View larger version (53K): [in this window] [in a new window] [PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]   Fig 4 Vertebral fracture

 

What causes osteoporosis?

Age related bone loss starts in the fourth or fifth decade of life (fig 5). It occurs as a result of increased bone breakdown by osteoclasts (fig 6) and decreased bone formation by osteoblasts.³ The role of oestrogen deficiency in menopausal and age related bone loss in women is well documented, and bone mass in elderly men is also positively related to oestrogen levels. Vitamin D insufficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism are common in elderly people and may contribute. Other possible factors are reduced physical activity with ageing and decreased production of insulin-like growth factors.

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window] [PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]   Fig 5 Age related changes in bone mass throughout life in women and men. Peak bone mass is attained in the third decade of life and age related bone loss probably starts around the age of 40 in both men and women. In women, bone loss accelerates around the time of the menopause

 

View larger version (102K): [in this window] [in a new window] [PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]   Fig 6 Scanning electron micrograph of an osteoclast resorbing bone

 
Genetic factors have a strong influence on peak bone mass, which is attained during the third decade of life and is an important determinant of bone mass later in life. Nutrition, particularly calcium and vitamin D intake, hormonal status, and physical activity also influence peak bone mass.

Although low bone mass has a major role in the pathogenesis of fracture, factors related to falling—risk of falling, protective response, and energy absorption— make an important contribution. In addition, aspects of bone composition and structure that may not be captured by bone mineral density measurements, such as bone size and geometry, and bone structure and material, contribute to increased bone fragility.

Methods We searched PubMed with the terms osteoporosis plus randomised controlled trials (124 hits), systematic reviews (118), meta-analyses (218), and Cochrane database (15). We also searched using the terms risk factors plus osteoporosis and systematic reviews (34) or meta-analyses (58). We searched the "epub ahead of print" sections of the relevant specialist journals.

Ongoing research Evaluation of new treatments, including: A human monoclonal antibody to the receptor activator of NFkB ligand (RANKL), which is given subcutaneously once every six months Oral calciomimetic drugs that stimulate intermittent production of parathyroid hormone Selective oestrogen receptor modulators with mixed oestrogenic and anti-oestrogenic effects Inhibitors of sclerostin, a protein produced by bone that is a negative regulator of bone formation, and its signalling pathway Investigation of the causes and management of poor compliance and persistence Assessment of the long term effects of anti-resorptive treatments on bone strength

Who is at risk of osteoporosis?

Lower peak bone mass, increased bone loss at the menopause, and greater longevity all confer a greater risk of osteoporosis in women than in men, and the disease is most commonly seen in postmenopausal women. Some of the risk factors for osteoporosis (box 1) are at least partially independent of bone mineral density,^w2-w6 whereas the effect of others on fracture risk is mediated solely through reduced bone mineral density. Oral glucocorticoids, which are taken by about 1% of the population and 2.5% of those aged over 75, are a common cause of osteoporosis, and there are specific national guidelines for the prevention and management of glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis (see additional educational resources box).

Box 1 Risk factors for osteoporosis Independent of bone mineral density Age Previous fragility fracture Maternal history of hip fracture Oral glucocorticoid therapy Current smoking Alcohol intake 3 units/day Rheumatoid arthritis Body mass index 19 Falls Depending on bone mineral density Untreated hypogonadism Malabsorption Endocrine disease Chronic renal disease Chronic liver disease Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Immobility Drugs (aromatase inhibitors, androgen deprivation therapy)

How does osteoporosis present?

Osteoporosis often presents as a clinically evident fracture. A low trauma fracture (following a fall from standing height or less) in someone aged over 45 should trigger the suspicion of osteoporosis. In other cases, osteoporosis may present as backache, height loss, spinal deformity, or radiological osteopenia.

Although most fractures due to osteoporosis present clinically, vertebral fractures may be asymptomatic in as many as two thirds of patients.⁴ It is important to detect these fractures since they carry a high risk of further fractures in the spine and elsewhere.⁵ Lateral x rays of the spine should be considered in patients with height loss or spinal deformity.

Who should be treated?

The World Health Organization's definition of osteoporosis is based on bone mineral density in the spine and proximal femur measured with dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporosis is classified as a bone mineral density 2.5 or more standard deviations below normal peak bone mass—that is, a T score –2.5.⁶ Other techniques—for example, ultrasound of the calcaneus and peripheral DXA measurements—cannot be used in the same way to diagnose osteoporosis but are useful as a preliminary assessment of risk where access to axial DXA is inadequate.

Although osteoporosis indicates a high likelihood of fracture, many fragility fractures occur in people with bone density values above the defined level.⁷ Fractures can be better predicted by adding clinical risk factors that contribute to fracture risk independently of bone mineral density (fig 7; box 1).⁸ This approach is being developed under the auspices of the WHO and will be delivered in the form of an algorithm that enables the probability of a fracture to be calculated from clinical risk factors with or without bone mineral density values. Intervention thresholds based on cost effectiveness^w7 can be used to make a decision about treatment.⁹

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window] [PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]   Fig 7 Age affects fracture risk independently of bone mineral density. For any given bone density, the fracture probability increases with age. For example, at a T score of –2, the 10 year hip fracture probability at the age of 50 is around 5% but at the age of 80 it is around 30%29

 
People who have already had a fragility fracture are at greatly increased risk of sustaining a further fracture,⁵ and pharmacological intervention should be started promptly in such cases. Bone density measurement is not always required to confirm the diagnosis of osteoporosis, particularly in older patients, but is useful where the trauma preceding the fracture is uncertain or where other causes of fracture are suspected. Secondary causes of osteoporosis should be excluded (box 2).

Box 2 Routine investigations to exclude secondary causes of osteoporosis Full blood count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate Liver and renal function tests Bone function tests (calcium, phosphate, and alkaline phosphatase) Serum immunoglobulins and paraproteins, urinary Bence-Jones proteins Thyroid function tests

Management of osteoporosis

Non-pharmacological measures
Falls have an important role in the pathogenesis of fragility fractures, particularly in frail and elderly people. Multiple medical and environmental factors increase the risk of falling and many of these are modifiable. Multifaceted interventions have been shown to reduce the frequency of falling but not fractures.¹⁰

Lifestyle measures to improve bone health include maintaining adequate dietary calcium intake and normal vitamin D status.^{w8 w9} Appropriate levels of exercise should be recommended and smoking and alcohol abuse discouraged.¹¹ Physiotherapy and pain relief are important in managing fractures.

Pharmacological interventions
Therapeutic options for osteoporosis have increased considerably over recent years. Although most patients with osteoporosis can be managed in primary care, some patients benefit from specialist assessment: younger men and women, patients who continue to fracture despite treatment, and those who require assessment for anabolic treatments. Anabolic and intravenous treatments are generally instigated by hospital specialists; thereafter, shared care between primary and secondary organisations is appropriate.

Currently licensed treatments (table) include the bisphosphonates, raloxifene and hormone replacement therapy (which prevent bone resorption), strontium ranelate (uncertain mechanism of action), and parathyroid hormone peptides (anabolic). Without head to head comparison trials with fracture end points, the efficacy of these drugs cannot be directly compared. Some, but not all, have proved efficacy against vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, including hip fractures,^w10 and this is an important factor influencing choice. Safety, tolerability, and cost are important considerations, and NICE (the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) is currently assessing the cost effectiveness of different interventions in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures.^w11

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Pharmacological interventions for osteoporosis

 
Bisphosphonates
Alendronate, etidronate, ibandronate, and risedronate are approved for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis. Alendronate, etidronate, and risedronate are approved for glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis, and alendronate is approved for osteoporosis in men. Because alendronate and risedronate have been shown to reduce vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, including hip fractures,^{12 13 14 15 w12 w13} they are considered first line options for preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis. Oral bisphosphonates must be taken fasting, with a full glass of water, and the individual must be upright and stay sitting or standing without taking food or drink for the next 30-60 minutes. Bisphosphonates are generally well tolerated but may be associated with upper gastrointestinal side effects, particularly if the dosing regimen is not adhered to.

An intravenous formulation of ibandronate is approved for postmenopausal osteoporosis. It is given as an injection over 15-30 seconds every three months. Antifracture efficacy has not been directly shown for this formulation or for the oral 150 mg once monthly regimen, but it is assumed from a bridging study based on changes in bone mineral density.^{16 17}

Strontium ranelate
Strontium ranelate (a sachet mixed with water and taken daily) reduces vertebral and non-vertebral (including hip) fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.^{18 19} Adverse events are generally mild and include diarrhoea and headache. The spectrum of anti-fracture efficacy of strontium ranelate makes it an alternative front line option to alendronate or risedronate,^w14 particularly in people for whom these drugs are contraindicated or are not tolerated.

Raloxifene
Raloxifene reduces the risk of vertebral fractures, but has not been shown to prevent fractures at other sites.^{20 w15} Side effects include hot flushes, leg cramps, and a threefold increase in the relative risk of venous thromboembolism. Raloxifene also protects against breast cancer.²¹ It can be regarded as a second line option in younger postmenopausal women with vertebral osteoporosis.

Parathyroid hormone peptides
Teriparatide (recombinant 1-34 parathyroid hormone), given as a subcutaneous daily injection of 20 µg, reduces vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.^{22 w16} Preotact, the full 1-84 parathyroid hormone peptide, has recently been approved and is given in the same way in a daily dose of 100 µg. Neither of these interventions has been shown to reduce hip fractures. Because they cost more than other options, they are reserved for patients with severe osteoporosis who are unable to tolerate or seem to be unresponsive to other treatments.

Hormone replacement therapy
Because the risk-benefit balance of hormone replacement therapy is generally unfavourable in older postmenopausal women, it is regarded as a second line treatment option.²³ It is an appropriate option in younger postmenopausal women at high risk of fracture, particularly those with vasomotor symptoms.

Calcium and vitamin D
The available evidence does not support a role for calcium and vitamin D alone in preventing osteoporotic fractures, except in institutionalised elderly people.^{24 25 w17} Calcium and vitamin D supplements should be prescribed with other treatments for osteoporosis since the evidence base for their efficacy in preventing fractures is derived from studies in which calcium and vitamin D were routinely administered.

Monitoring of treatment
Whether treatment response should be monitored and, if so, whether bone density measurements or biochemical markers should be used, is unclear. Compliance and persistence with osteoporosis treatments need to be improved²⁶; possible approaches include better patient education and the use of intermittent dosing regimens, such as once weekly or once monthly oral bisphosphonate therapy and three monthly intravenous ibandronate. Even longer dosing intervals are expected in the near future, with the likely approval of once yearly intravenous zoledronic acid.²⁷

Summary points Fragility fractures caused by osteoporosis affect one in two women and one in five men over the age of 50 Vertebral fractures in particular remain under-recognised and under-treated and are associated with poor health outcomes A range of pharmacological treatments is effective in reducing the risk of fracture Poor patient compliance and persistence with prescribed treatments for osteoporosis are common but may be improved by better patient education A minority of patients will benefit from assessment in secondary care for starting anabolic treatments or interventional techniques, particularly when other treatments have failed

Patient's story My name is Jean Marsh and I am 73 years old. I had "sailed" through the menopause by the age of 45 and led an active life. My health was excellent until I was 58 years old, when one morning I noticed a dull ache between my shoulder blades. This got progressively worse and I saw my GP a few days later. He couldn't identify the problem and gave me painkillers. Later that evening I was in terrible pain. The next day I asked for an x ray and this showed collapse of the T7 vertebra. My GP gave me a leaflet from the National Osteoporosis Society, which I joined immediately. Of the free booklets that I received, How to Cope was wonderful and I remember crying with joy that someone understood what I was going through. The pain lasted for about 10 weeks, lessening a little as the weeks went by. I was terrified of falling, so going out was difficult. I couldn't lie down in bed and had to sleep propped up by lots of pillows. Clothes were difficult because of my new shape. I was prescribed etidronate followed by HRT. My bone density increased during this time, and my fear of falling gradually disappeared. I now lead a very busy, normal life. I do have a weakness in my spine, which aches when I do too much gardening, but other than that I am now fine.

Tips for non-specialists Patients at risk of osteoporosis can be identified by using clinical risk factors Treatment should be started as rapidly as possible in patients presenting with a fragility fracture The patient's preference is an important consideration in choosing treatment options Compliance and persistence with treatments for osteoporosis are poor but can be improved by better patient education Audit should focus on high risk groups, such as patients taking glucocorticoids and patients with previous fragility fracture

Additional educational resources Sambrook P, Cooper C. Osteoporosis. Lancet 2006;367:2010-8. Department of Health and Human Services. Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the surgeon general. Rockville: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General, 2004. Guidelines Working Group for the Bone and Tooth Society, National Osteoporosis Society, and Royal College of Physicians. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: guidelines for prevention and treatment. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2002. (www.rcplondon.ac.uk/pubs/books/glucocorticoid/index.asp) Bone Research Society website picture gallery (www.brsoc.org.uk/gallery/default.htm) Information resources for patients National Osteoporosis Society (www.nos.org.uk)—UK charity that raises awareness of osteoporosis and provides patient support and education. The website contains links to the BMJ, several professional and patient societies, and the Department of Health and a number of educational resources for patients and professionals International Osteoporosis Foundation (www.iofbonehealth.org)—a non-profit organisation that advocates the early prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis and related bone diseases and provides educational material for patients and healthcare professionals. A comprehensive teaching package on vertebral fractures is provided on this website

---

References w1-w17 are on bmj.com

We thank T R Arnett, University College London, for the scanning electron micrographs (figures 1 and 6).

Competing interests: KESP has been reimbursed by the Alliance for Better Bone Health for attending a scientific conference. JEC has received payment for consultancy work and speaking engagements from Procter & Gamble, Eli Lilly, GSK/Roche, Amgen, Pfizer, Servier, Shire, Novartis and Nycomed and has been reimbursed for attending scientific conferences by Procter & Gamble, Eli Lilly, and Servier. She receives funding for a grant from Procter & Gamble and has acted as an expert witness in several cases of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and in an alendronate patent dispute.

References

1. Dolan P, Torgerson DJ. The cost of treating osteoporotic fractures in the United Kingdom female population. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:551-2.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
2. Cummings SR, Melton III LJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 2002;359:1761-7.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
3. Compston JE. Sex steroids and bone. Physiol Rev 2001;81:419-47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ. Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:221-7.[ISI][Medline]
5. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott III TA, Berger M. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:721-39.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
6. WHO Study Group. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to postmenopausal osteoporosis. World Health Organ Tech Ser 1984;(843).
7. Siris ES, Chen Y-T, Abbott TA, Barrett-Connor E, Miller PD, Wehren LE, et al. Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological interventions to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1108-12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Kanis JA. Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 2002;359:1929-36.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
9. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, de Laet C, Oglesby A, Jönsson B. Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis. Bone 2002;31:26-31.[Medline]
10. Close J, Ellis M, Hooper R, Glucksman E, Jackson S, Swift C. Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999;353:93-7.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
11. Hind K, Burrows M. Weight-bearing exercise and bone mineral accrual in children and adolescents: a review of controlled trials. Bone 2006 Sep 4(online publication).
12. Black D, Cummings S, Karpf D, Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Nevitt MC, et al. Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Lancet 1996;348:1535-41.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
13. Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK, McKeever CD, Hangartner T, Keller M, et al. Effect of risedronate treatment on vertebral and non vertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1999;282:1344-52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Reginster JY, Minne H, Sorensen O, Hooper M, Roux C, Brandi ML, et al. Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:83-91.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
15. McClung MR, Geusens P, Miller PD, Zippel H, Benson WG, Roux C, et al. Effect of risedronate on the risk of hip fracture in elderly women. Hip Intervention Program Study Group. N Engl J Med 2001;344:333-40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Delmas PD, Recker RR, Chesnut CH 3rd, Skag A, Stakkestad JA, Emkey R, et al. Daily and intermittent oral ibandronate normalize bone turnover and provide significant reduction in vertebral fracture risk: results from the BONE study. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:792-8.[ISI][Medline]
17. Delmas PD, Adami S, Strugala C, Stakkestad JA, Reginster JY, Felsenberg D, et al. Intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: one-year results from the dosing intravenous administration study. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:1838-46.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
18. Meunier PJ, Roux C, Seeman E, Ortolani S, Badurski J, Spector TD, et al. The effects of strontium ranelate on the risk of vertebral fracture in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 2004;350:459-68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Reginster JY, Seeman E, De Vernejoul MC, Adami S, Compston J, Phenekos C, et al. Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis (TROPOS) study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:2816-22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH, Knickerbocker RK, Nickelsen T, Genant HK, et al. Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. JAMA 1999;282:637-45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Cummings SR, Eckert S, Krueger KA, Grady D, Powles TJ, Cauley JA, et al. The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. JAMA 1999;281:2189-97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster JY. Effect of parathyroid hormone on vertebral bone mass and fracture incidence among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1434-41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Compston J. How to manage osteoporosis after the menopause. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005;19:1007-19.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Willett WC, Wong JB, Giovannucci E, Dietrich T, Dawson-Hughes B. Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2005;293:2257-64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Boonen S, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Cooper C, Lips P, Ljunggren O, Meunier PJ, et al. Addressing the musculoskeletal components of fracture risk with calcium and vitamin D: a review of the evidence. Calcif Tissue Int 2006;78:257-70.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
26. Compston JE, Seeman E. Compliance with osteoporosis therapy is the weakest link. Lancet 2006;368:973-4.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
27. Reid IR, Brown JP, Burckhardt P, Horowitz Z, Richardson P, Treschel U, et al. Intravenous zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med 2002;346:653-61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Dennison E, Cole Z, Cooper C. Diagnosis and epidemiology of osteoporosis. Curr Opinion Rheumatol 2005;17:456-61.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
29. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Dawson A, De Laet C, Jonsson B. et al. Ten year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds. Osteoporosis Int 2001;12:989-95[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

(Accepted 19 November 2006)

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Shifting the focus in fracture prevention from osteoporosis to falls

Teppo L N Järvinen, Harri Sievänen, Karim M Khan, Ari Heinonen, and Pekka Kannus
BMJ 2008 336: 124-126. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Jarvinen, T. L N, Sievanen, H., Khan, K. M, Heinonen, A., Kannus, P. (2008). Shifting the focus in fracture prevention from osteoporosis to falls. BMJ 336: 124-126 [Full text]  
• Kimmel, D.B. (2007). Mechanism of Action, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile, and Clinical Applications of Nitrogen-containing Bisphosphonates. J. Dent. Res. 86: 1022-1033 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Forward, D. P., Lindau, T. R., Melsom, D. S. (2007). Intercarpal Ligament Injuries Associated with Fractures of the Distal Part of the Radius. JBJS 89: 2334-2340 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Sugiyama, T., Takaki, T., Sakanaka, K., Sadamaru, H., Mori, K., Kato, Y., Taguchi, T., Saito, T. (2007). Warfarin-induced impairment of cortical bone material quality and compensatory adaptation of cortical bone structure to mechanical stimuli. J Endocrinol 194: 213-222 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Compston, J. (2007). Treatments for Osteoporosis -- Looking beyond the HORIZON. NEJM 356: 1878-1880 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

An incomplete article

Anthony N Glaser
bmj.com, 15 Dec 2006 [Full text]

Osteoporosis and its management

Alan W Fowler
bmj.com, 17 Dec 2006 [Full text]

Osteoporosis : what of the Asian, African and South American patient?

Suranjith L Seneviratne, et al.
bmj.com, 17 Dec 2006 [Full text]

Multiple myeloma mimics osteoporosis � biochemical markers are useful

Amit Patel
bmj.com, 21 Dec 2006 [Full text]

Incorrect label on figure 2

Susan M Ott
bmj.com, 10 Jan 2007 [Full text]

Osteoporosis education is central to treatment

Sarah J Abrahamson
bmj.com, 20 Jan 2007 [Full text]

What about renal failure?

Giles E Aldworth
bmj.com, 21 Jan 2007 [Full text]

Use of percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Dino Samartzis, et al.
bmj.com, 27 Jan 2007 [Full text]