Open letter from
Boris Gelfand
In recent interviews of Garry Kasparov on Kasparovchess.ru
and in Russian daily "Sport-express" Mr. Kasparov
made few statements about my role in his match against
Vladimir Kramnik and I would like to clarify few
things. Unfortunately original English version of
one of these interviews isn't available in print,
so I am forced to retranslate it from Russian, when
quoting Mr. Kasparov.
Mr. Kasparov claims that as we had together training
session in 1998 it should have prevented me from
working with other players in the world. However
I never was his trainer (or somebody's else), but
just a sparring-partner, as well as he was mine.
During my career I had a lot of sparring-partners
(this is the most common way of working on chess
for majority of top players, as it allows chessplayers
to enhance each other with new ideas and besides,
very few can afford to have a personal second.)
Clearly, it goes without saying that any ideas found
in the joint analysis can never be shared with any
third party and a possibility to break this rule
never crossed my mind.
Mr. Kasparov said: "When people are working for
money - there is no disgrace in doing that. So Kramnik
had worked in my team during my match with Anand.
… However … some of his [Kramnik's] colleagues were
helping him apparently because of "especially warm
feelings" towards me. … This is beyond my ethical
code. In my opinion Gelfand has a different one."
This statement clearly shows that great ex-champion
obviously lacks understanding of what friendship
is. I can only feel pity to him in this respect.
In another place he states "He [Gelfand] broke all
the moral grounds". I want to reply to these groundless
accusations.
For the last 8 years we have been regularly exchanging
ideas with Vladimir Kramnik, helping each other
in preparation for different tournaments as well
as during the tournaments if we play together. Whenever
one of us is playing in the event, we help each
other through telephone. Taking this chance, I want
to thank Vladimir for countless ideas he shared
with me that helped me to win a lot of games. This
is well-known to everybody in chess world, including
Garry Kasparov. Garry Kimovich himself in his interviews
added myself to a team of Kramnik's advisors during
Kramnik-Shirov match, whereas in fact I was not
Kramnik's second during that match and didn't take
part in any of training sessions which were held
before both Kramnik-Shirov and the match just finished.
As far as the differences in ethical code are concerned,
Mr. Kasparov indeed proved his thesis in Novgorod
1997, when Vladimir had to beat me in the last round
to catch Garry and win tournament on tie-break.
After drawing quickly his own game Kasparov started
to make statements in front of press and public
that our game with Kramnik is a fix and I am going
to lose the game to let my friend win a tournament.
Fortunately, after 7 hour long defense I managed
to draw that game. Yet we are still waiting for
apology.
Also in the above-mentioned interviews Kasparov
attributes novelty in 6th game and Be2 somewhere
( I guess in 12th game) to me. I take it as a compliment,
as I would be proud to invent such novelties. However
this is a fruit of preparation of Vladimir Kramnik
and his 3 great seconds and I first time saw these
ideas when analyzing these games of the match.
At the end of his interview to the "Sport-Express"
Mr. Kasparov says: "The time of pragmatical market
has come. What is your company worth? How much do
your stocks cost? … And now to chess world came
champion who symbolizes this cynical and pragmatical
approach. … Many don't like style of Kramnik's games
which give no pleasure to people." Cheap attacks,
but still I would like to have at least a few names
of those, who confessed to Garry Kimovich that they
don't enjoy Kramnik's games. I personally do, as
well as Kasparov himself did just few months ago.
Boris Gelfand 20.11.2000
|