TITLE: The Declaration Versus The Communist Manifesto AUTHOR: Larry Nickell, Karval, CO GRADE LEVEL/SUBJECT: 9-12, American Government OVERVIEW: Students fail to connect the American governmental system with values and beliefs, but think government is for self-aggrandizement; they do not see value in equal opportunity as opposed to equality of position or condition. PURPOSE: In this activity a student will be challenged to see if he or she can discern the difference between the values found in the Declaration of Independence (and consequently, is a part of our system) and those of the Communist Manifesto. Most students do not have a good knowledge of either documents but assume they know the differences. This is to clarify the differences. OBJECTIVES: Students will be able to: 1. Know the difference between the Declaration and the Communist Manifesto. 2. Regard opinions as to whether they have democratic or autocratic meanings. 3. Know the meaning of euphemism. 4. Be better able to perceive the fundamental beliefs and doctrines by which we live in this nation. ACTIVITIES AND PROCEDURES: This activity is best done before any reading of either document. It should be done as a correlative exercise of the early formative period of the nation and of the Declaration in particular. 1. Hand out the test on the Communist Manifesto and Declaration. Tell the students that if they don't know for sure whether a statement is from the Declaration or the Manifesto, to take a logical guess from the issues or tone of the statement. (No grade is to be taken on this part of the exercise, but those questions the students get right can be given as a bonus.) 2. After taking the test, read each question and have the students hold hands up on each question as to which document the statement was taken from. Then tell them the answer and why it is more logical that it come from the particular document from which it was taken. You may call for observations from the students, both as to what led them to their correct or incorrect answer, and whether they can perceive a pattern developing. 3. Finish the test. Collect the papers. Then have the students read the Declaration. 4. Then retest the students using either the same testing material or different quotes from the two sources. TYING IT ALL TOGETHER: 1. Students gain insights to our theories of government by comparing it to the thoughts expressed in documents divergent from our own. 2. In a comparative government class, deeper analysis can be taken not only of our democratic system, but can open doors to understanding the social milieu that generated each document and can allow analysis of the historical significance of each. 3. This exercise can generate questions that can be resolved by further study or can be the nucleus for a term paper; for instance, someone might want to write on class systems, and whether or not it is what generates all social ills as Marx thought. 4. Other questions that can be answered involves what the students perceive as the underlying reasons each document was written. You can ask if the students can feel a different tone in each document. Are there words or phrases used which sound grand and glorious but the actuality of those ideas or words in the real world have led to other conditions other than what the author envisioned. Sample statements from the Declaration and the Manifesto. 1. The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggle. (M) 2. The history of the present (ruler) is ... a history of repeated injuries and usurpations. (D) 3. In the place of the old wants, satisfied by the productions of country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes. (M) 4. The ideas of religious liberty and freedom of conscience merely gave expression to the sway of free competition within the domain of knowledge. (M) 5. Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it... (D) 6. The ruling ideas of each age have never been the ideas of its ruling class. (M) 7. Governments ... long established should not be changed for light and transient causes... (D) 8. A (ruler) whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be a ruler of a free people. 9. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into a great hostile camps. (M) 10. ... man's consciousness changes with every change in the conditions of his material existence, in his social relations, and his social life. (M) 11. In every stage of these oppressions, we have petitioned for redress... (D) 12. In proportion as the exploitation of one individual by another is put an end to, the exploitation of one nation by another will also come to an end. (M) 13. ...we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor. (D) 14. In this sense the theory ... may be summed up in the single sentence: abolition of private property. (M) 15. National differences and antagonisms between peoples are daily more and more vanishing. (M) 16. When a long train of abuses...evinces a design to reduce (the people) under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. (D) 17. National one-sidedness and narrow-mindedness become more and more impossible, and from the numerous national and local literatures there arises a world literature. (M) 18. ...we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends. (D) 19. ...openly declare that (our) ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing conditions. (M) 20. ...established a heavy progressive or graduated income tax. (M) 21. When people speak of ideas that revolutionize society they do but express the fact that within the old society the elements of a new one has been created. (M) 22. ...governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. (D) 23. Let the ruling class tremble at (our) revolution. The (revolutionaries) have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. (M) 24. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants. (those who leave the country.) (M) 25. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by the Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. (D) 26. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;... (D)