Piececlopedia: Mao

The Mao is quite well known as the 'knight' in Xiangqi (aka Chinese Chess), as well as Korean Chess. Its name is Chinese for horse. It has some popularity as a problem piece, and you can see some examples at the Retrograde Analysis Corner, and on Torsten Linss' problem page.

Movement

The Mao is similar to the chess Knight - it ends up the same distance away, but it can not jump over intervening pieces like the chess Knight. Rather, the Mao is considered to move first one space orthogonally, and then one space diagonally (away from the starting square) to its destination. The intermediate square must be empty.

Note that this makes it possible for the mao to pin pieces, and it is possible for a Mao to attack an opposing Mao without that Mao attacking back.

Movement diagram

In the diagram below, the White mao on d5 can move to all the squares marked with a black circle. It can also capture the Black mao, even though the Black mao can not capture the White one. Also note that the Black king is not in check, but that the Black rook is pinned.

Vocabulary: Pass-Through Space

To reach its destination, a Mao must have an unoccupied pass-through space. This is a space that must be stepped through for a piece to continue moving. Riders and steppers have pass-through spaces, though leapers do not. When a Mao moves, it first makes one step orthogonally, then makes a second step diagonally outward. Its first step takes it to a pass-through space. If this space is occupied, it cannot make any move in that direction. Having this pass-through space is what distinguishes the Mao from the Knight. The Knight leaps to the same spaces a Mao may step to, whether or not any spaces in between are occupied. For a rider, such as a Rook, each space in its path is a pass-through space to the next space. If any space in its path is occupied, it cannot move further.

Images

For author and/or inventor information on this item see: this item's information page.
Created on: January 15, 1999. Last modified on: February 07, 2003.

Comments

This item has comments. View all comments for this item.

Provide feedback on this page!

[info] [edit] [link]