Home Shop
Chess Books Software
Magazine Chess
Sets & Boards Computers
Reviews Ornate
Sets Equipment
|
|
Contact Links
Map Calendar
Britbase Bound
Volumes Bridge
Go Backgammon
Poker Other
Games
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
BCM Chess Book Reviews : February 2000Return to the BCM Review Index
| Search for other BCM reviews by keyword
| More about BCM...
|
The idea for this book is an attractive one each double page is devoted to one year of the twentieth century. The sub-title gives the objective: the best chess 1900-1999 in historical context. This has been done by reporting the major events, giving two or three part-games and sections covering World News and Chess News in Brief.
The major difficulty with a book of this type is the proper balance between
material included or excluded. This has not been fully resolved here.
Much of the World News in Brief could have been excluded concentrating
only on those events affecting chess. Chess News in Brief is just that
and would have benefited from more background and personal evaluation
than Burgess has allowed himself. The problems of material selection are
illustrated by the entry for 1987 where the dramatic world championship
match of that year is relegated to two sentences in Chess News in Brief
and Kasparovs must-win 24th game against Karpov (surely
the highlight game of the year) not included. Despite these reservations
the book is beautifully presented and the buyer gets much splendid chess
for his money. (Review by Ray Edwards)
Soltis sets himself the ambitious target of providing a comprehensive history which sets the players, their vast creative and sporting achievements in the historical environment in which they had to live and if possible, survive. This is not easy as Soltis has to evaluate many controversies where the truth has often been deliberately obscured. None the less the growth, rise, triumph and fall of the Soviet Chess world and its intimate relationship to the wider political scene is graphically described. The leading personalities are given sympathetic but balanced treatment. Playing chess for a living is never easy, but given that the economic rewards were surprisingly poor and political penalties for failure severe, no wonder many players (Spassky, Korchnoi ) left the USSR when they could.
The book is beautifully bound and printed as we have come to expect from
McFarland, and contains comprehensive indexes, bibliography and sources.
It is an outstanding work of scholarship which can be recommended without
reservation. (Review by Ray Edwards)
This is a welcome first translation into English of a famous book entitled
Dreihundert Schachpartien in the original German. Tarrasch was
in his early thirties when this book was first published (1895) and could
then be considered to be in his prime. This is basically an autobiographical
journey from his chess beginnings in Breslau up to his big tournament
successes of the 1890s. Tarrasch has an engaging style of writing, and
can be self-deprecating as well as boastful. Generally his opponents receive
generous praise for their worthier efforts and he presents many of his
worst disasters alongside the victories. The translation (by Sol Schwartz)
flows well; the occasional typo does not mar what is an excellent production
and a long overdue addition to the English-speaking chess-players
library.
OUT OF PRINT |
Published in Bulgaria but written in English, this is a collection of
200 annotated games by the great Russian grandmaster. The book is divided
into chapters corresponding to different periods of Chigorins chess
career, each prefaced with full biographical details, statistics, cross-tables
and a discussion of his (very considerable) contribution to opening theory.
The book is rounded off with a further 575 unannotated games. All games
are presented in Informator style. It is not clear to what extent the
current FIDE World Champion contributed to the writing, but all in all
it is a gem of a book and excellent value for money.
The Staunton-St.Amant recriminations rumble on into another year, and
there is some mock Dickensian writing from Captain Kennedy. There is an
amusing article on the game at chess by telegraph in 1845
between Staunton and Kennedy in Gosport and a group of players at the
London Vauxhall railway terminus. The Gosport allies missed the last train
home because of the delay caused by the telegrapher retransmitting the
moves to people following the game in Southampton. Though not the first
game by telegraph, this could have been the earliest instance of the phenomenon
known to internet chess players as lag.
This is a superbly produced volume with chapters on the various eras
of correspondence chess in the USA, including biographical coverage of
two of its most famous players, Berliner and Palciauskas. There are 232
games, most of which have textual annotations and the book is well indexed
with a plethora of statistical and background information. The author
draws an imaginative parallel between the British Invasion
of annotators used by the magazine The Chess Correspondent in the
1950s, and the British invasion of American rock-and-roll a few years
later. I dont suppose anyone has compared Barden, Clarke, Wade and
Golombek with Messrs Lennon, Macartney, Jagger and Richards before, but
its a stimulating thought.
Most chess players have occasionally
dabbled in chess variants, perhaps because they offer a chance to escape
the restrictions of opening theory and accepted practice. Veteran player
David Pritchard is very much an expert in this field, having previously
written The Encyclopaedia of Chess Variants. He details some 18
deviant forms of chess and offers practical advice, tips on strategy,
and basic opening theory pertaining to each of the variants.
Following up their 1995
book Winning Endgame Technique, the same two authors write more
about the endgame, for the most part utilising more up-to-date material
than in the first volume. This book is filled with examples of all types
of endings, together with exercises to test the readers comprehension.
The book is divided into chapters clearly delineating different types
of endgame, and is readily usable as a reference work, making it a good
option for the serious student of the endgame.
This material appeared originally in descriptive notation in a book called
King Power In Chess, published by David McKay in 1982. Grandmaster
Edmar Mednis endeavours to explain when the king should step out boldly
in the middlegame and when it is safer to stay at home and wait.The
authors quoted examples are well-chosen and illustrate the kings
many possibilities for activity.
The title is intended as an analogy for the pawns race down the
board to become a queen, clearing obstacles set in its path. Correspondence
IM Charushin looks at openings featuring turbo-charged pawns, and also
middlegames and endings with long pawn marches, illustrated with over
200 games, mostly unannotated. There is no real attempt at classification
and a few misprints could be found.
A cheaply produced but entertaining collection of games and part-games
demonstrating how to play with (and against) hanging pawns. The typesetting
is erratic but the content is well-selected, if somewhat disorganised.
This is second book (after Hanging Pawns, reviewed above) in ICEs
six-book series on strategic themes. As with the previous title, the theme
is illustrated via a collection of lightly-annotated part-games showing
the strength of two bishops working together. The introduction is followed
by a useful theme index.
This is the third in ICEs strategic themes series: this time the
authors are dealing with the specific theme of rook versus two minor pieces
in the middlegame and endgame. The typesetting is off-putting, and the
book remarkable for its avant garde indexing. The contents are listed
at the bottom of a page three quarters of the way through the book, and
the players index scattered throughout the book in small segments,
where the typesetter feels in need of filling up some white space. Weird
minds at work here, but the content is worthwhile.