Chessville
logo by
ChessPrints
Advertise
with
Chessville!!
Advertise to
thousands
of
chess
fans
for
as little
as $25.
Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each.
From the
Chessville
Chess Store
From the
Chessville
Chess Store
|
Aleister Crowley…Chess Master ?!
by
Robert T. Tuohey
Imagine facing this guy...OTB!
Let’s get one thing straight: Aleister
Crowley has been called a lot of things by a lot of people.
Infamously, the scandal sheets of his day branded him “the wickedest man in
the world”. The English novelist W. Somerset Maugham, in “A Fragment
of Autobiography” (note 1), called Crowley “…a fake, but not entirely a
fake”. In a similar memoir, “A Moveable Feast”, Ernest Hemingway,
tongue-in-cheek and pernod-in-hand, tagged Crowley “the Devil’s Disciple”
(note 2). And yet, many have found the man inspirational, for example
Jimmy Page, the Beatles, and Ozzie. Indeed, to thousands worldwide, the
Great Beast 666 (as Crowley is known to his followers), is the prophet of
the New Aeon religion Thelema (note 3).
Finally, usually somewhere near the bottom
of the page, after a long and varied list of attributes (e.g., world
traveler, mountain climber, poet, prophet, artist, womanizer, drug user,
occultist, and so on), they also toss in that he was a chess expert.
So, what have we got here? Well, by
all accounts, soul-deep in the magick, or occult, or black (choose your
shading) arts, a prolific writer (I guesstimate in excess of twenty volumes
of work), the founder of a new religion, and one hell of a wild and crazy
guy. And, oh yeah, he could allegedly play a mean game of chess, too.
Alright, let’s cut to the endgame: Who in
the Devil’s name was Aleister Crowley? And could this guy really push
some wood or not?
Born Edward Alexander Crowley October 12,
1875 (note 4), in Leamington, Warwickshire, England, his wealthy parents
were devout members of the strict, fundamentalist Christian sect the
Plymouth Brethren (oddly, the family fortune was derived from an ale brewing
business, and yet their religion demanded strict teetotalism).
Certainly, Crowley’s childhood cannot be termed an unhappy one, and yet an
atmosphere of such uncompromising religiosity on so boisterous a young
spirit tends for a bad mix.
The child showed a certain giftedness, as
recorded here by Crowley himself (using the third person), in his
“Confessions” (note 5).
The boy's intellect was amazingly
precocious. It must have been very shortly after the move to Redhill
that a tailor named Hemming came from London to make new clothes for his
father. Being a "brother", he was a guest in the house. He
offered to teach Alick chess and succeeded only too well, for he lost
every game after the first. The boy recalls the method perfectly.
It was to catch a developed bishop by attacking it with pawns. (He
actually invented the Tarrasch Trap in the Ruy Lopez before he ever read a
book on chess.) This wrung from his bewildered teacher the
exclamation, "Very judicious with his pawns is your son, Mrs. Crowley!"
As a matter of fact, there must have been
more than this in it. Alick had assuredly a special aptitude for the
game; for he never met his master till one fatal day in 1895, when W. V.
Naish, the President of the C. U. Ch. C., took the "fresher" who had
beaten him to Peterhouse, the abode of Mr. H. E. Atkins, since seven times
amateur champion of England
and still a formidable figure in the Masters' Tournament.
It
may here be noted that the injudicious youth tried to trap Atkins with a
new move invented by himself. It consists of playing K R B Sq,
instead of Castles, in the Muzio Gambit, the idea being to allow White to
play P Q 4 in reply to Q B 3.
At about the age of 18, as befitting a young
gentleman of means, Crowley “went up to Cambridge”. By now, however,
his true personality was beginning to assert itself, and he seems to have
squandered precious little time on coursework, instead occupying himself
with writing poetry (selections of his work would later be included in the
Oxford Book of Mystical Verse and the anthology Cambridge Poets
1900-1913), mountain climbing, and, of course, chess (he soon became
president of the university club).
Regarding his chessic activities at
university, again dipping into the Confessions (note 6), we glean the
following:
At Eastbourne, I had still no interest in
games. I was still prevented from anything like intimate association
with my fellow creatures. I was still ignorant of the existence of
English literature and I became a first-rate French scholar without
reading any French literature. In my play time I was either hunting
flappers on the front, playing chess or climbing Beachy Head. My
chess was almost entirely book learning and I was very mush surprised to
find myself the best player in the town. For although the local
champion insisted on giving me pawn and more, I beat him so easily every
time I met him that the odds might have been reversed without making much
difference to the result. I edited a chess column in the Eastbourne
Gazette and made myself a host of enemies by criticizing the team. I
wanted to arouse enthusiasm, to insist on study and practice and to make
Eastbourne the strongest town in England. The result fell short of
breaking up the club, but not very far.
I used my position a editor to criticize
the formation of the team and anything else that seemed to me wrong.
I was absolutely unable to conceive that anyone should be anything but
grateful for constructive criticism. I had moreover in my mind a
firm conception of an editor as Jupiter tonans. I remember one
occasion on which I made myself particularly nasty. In a club
tournament I had won all my games except two against a man named Martin,
who had failed to play any of his games. At the same time he would
not withdraw from the tournament. I tried to deal with the situation
in my weekly articles. I requested Mr. Martin to begin to play his
games; I implored him to begin to play his games; I pointed out to him the
propriety of beginning to play his games, I showed him that the best
traditions of England (which had made her what she was) spoke with no
uncertain voice to the effect that he should begin to play his games.
All this settled down to a weekly chorus à la Cato, Delenda est Carthago.
Whatever the subject of my discourse, it invariably ended, "Mr. Martin has
not yet begun to play his games."
By this persistent
nagging I got him to make an appointment with me and the game had to be
adjourned in a position which was clearly won for me. He determined
to avoid defeat by the simple process of refusing to make any further
moves. I could have done a great deal with a brazier and a gimlet,
but short of that there was no moving him; and his abstention prevented me
from being proclaimed the winner. I published an analysis of the
position, demonstrating that he was bound to lose and suggesting that he
should either play it out or resign. But of course the result of my
manoeuvres had simply been to drive him into blind fury and the situation
was never settled. It simply lapsed by my departure for Switzerland.
(Note 7.)
And, more interestingly (note 8):
I was to find very shortly that the most
innocent personal relations could be taken by filthy minds as the basis
for their malicious imagination. The story of how this came about
dominates my third year at the university, as will appear. It seems
as if my destiny were preparing me for my appointed work by clearing
inessential factors out of the way. My one serious worldly ambition
had been to become the champion of the world at chess. I had
snatched a game from Blackburne in simultaneous play some years before.
I was being beaten in the Sicilian defence. The only chance was the
sacrifice of a rook. I remember the grand old master coming round to
my board and cocking his alcoholized eye cunningly at me. "Hullo,"
said he, "Morphy come to town again!" I am not coxcomb enough to
think that he could not have won the game, even after my brilliancy.
I believe that his colossal generosity let me win to encourage a promising
youngster.
I had frequently beaten Bird at Simpson's
and when I got to Cambridge I made a savagely intense study of the game.
In my second year I was president of the university and had beaten such
first-rate amateurs as Gunston and Coles. Outside the master class,
Atkins was my only acknowledge superior. I made mincemeat of the man
who was champion of Scotland a few years later, even after I had given up
the game. I spent over two hours a day in study and more than that
in practice. I was assured on all hands that another year would see
me a master myself.
I had been to St. Petersburg to learn
Russian for the Diplomatic Service in the long vacation of 1897, and on my
way back broke the journey in Berlin to attend the Chess Congress.
But I had hardly entered the room where the masters were playing when I
was seized with what may justly be described as a mystical experience.
I seemed to be looking on at the tournament from outside myself. I
saw the masters --- one, shabby, snuffy and blear-eyed; another, in badly
fitting would-be respectable shoddy; a third, a mere parody of humanity,
and so on for the rest. These were the people to whose ranks I was
seeking admission. "There, but for the grace of God, goes Aleister
Crowley," I exclaimed to myself with disgust, and there and then I
registered a vow never to play another serious game of chess. I
perceived with praeternatural lucidity that I had not alighted on this
planet with the object of playing chess.
As we
shall see, a pitiful few of Crowley’s games have been preserved. Among
these, however, a win against a Coles, of the university team, survives, as
well as a draw, but not a win, against the great Blackburne.
Several
years later, in 1904, in Cairo, Egypt, with his first wife, Crowley would
experience the event of his life – achieving communication with his Holy
Guardian Angel, Aiwass. From this encounter would result the Liber Al
vel Legis (or The Book of the Law). Shortly thereafter, Crowley would
found the religion of Thelema (Greek for “Will’), with The Book of the Law
serving as the central text.
I will not do Crowley
the injustice of attempting to thumbnail the rest of his colorful life
(as he says himself, it’s more like the lives of three people!).
Suffice it to say, what with world travels, mountain climbing (including
one of the first K-2 face attempts), prodigious writings, founding
magical organizations (most notably the disastrous Abbey in Cefalu,
Italy), two marriages and countless women (and even a few boys) in
between, Aleister Crowley was indeed a “man of many parts”. |
The Great
Beast 666 contemplates his next move… |
Crowley’s last years were spent in the
small English town of Hastings (certainly not unknown to chess players); for
some years he had been plagued by financial worries caused by the various
scandals that swirled around him. As no publisher was willing to take
him on (fearing government prosecution on some type of “public morals”
charge), and his personal resources has long since run out, he only managed
to survive via “hook and crook”. Never one to succumb to misfortunes,
however, Crowley continued to write during these hard, uncertain years,
producing, amongst other titles, his “Book Of Thoth” (a very significant
contribution to the theory of the Tarot cards).
In the evenings, however, the elderly,
though ever-bon-vivant, Crowley, strapped as he was for any ready cash,
complained a bit of being bored: he said he wished he had a lady friend to
occupy some of his time, or that at least there was a chess player around
who could give him a decent game.
Aleister Crowley died December 1, 1947.
As mentioned, a very few of Crowley’s
games have been preserved (although the number of fake Crowley games is
astounding) (note 9). In fact, to my knowledge, four definite
examples, with another five or six possible games, constitute the corpus
(there also exist 14 chess problems in the “Chess Notes”, see below, all or
some of which are of Crowley’s composition). All of the definite games
were played when he was at Cambridge.
With this limited evidence, all we can
truly venture is that Crowley was at least a strong amateur player; in all
likelihood, with the experience of years, he attained master-level strength.
Certainly, the man’s insight into the psychology of chess was deep.
Ponder these lines from one of Crowley’s short stories, written when he was
about forty (note 10):
“Let me tell you something, if you
will forgive a senior for prosing. There are two ways to play chess.
One is a man against a man; the other is a man against a chessboard.
It’s the difference between match and metal play in golf. Observe:
if I know you are going to play the Philidor defense to the King’s Knight
Opening, I do not risk being forced into the Petroff, which I dislike.
But in playing an unknown quantity, I must analyze every position like a
problem, and guard against all possibilities. It takes a great
genius and a lifetime’s devotion to play the latter game. But so
long as I can read your motive in your move, I can content myself with
guarding that one line. Should you make a move whose object I cannot
see, I am compelled to take a fresh view of the board and analyze the
position as if I were called upon to adjudicate an unfinished game.”
The first game analyzed below is from
an inter-collegiate match; Crowley clearly outplays his opponent,
demonstrating a sound grasp of fundamental chess principles (with, however,
something of a slip on his 32nd move). The second game is
from a six or seven board simul the famous English master Joseph Blackburne
gave at the Cambridge club; Crowley ventures an unsound pawn sac which,
incredibly, Blackburne miscalculates, leading to a draw.
Along with my own analysis, I have incorporated Crowley’s
own comments from his “Chess Notes”.
Coles - Crowley,A [B21]
Hailsham-EastBourne Match, 1894
1.e4 c5 2.d4
B21 Sicilian: Smith-Morra gambit.
2...cxd4 3.Qxd4 Nc6 4.Qd1 Nf6 5.Bc4?
OOB 5.Nc3 e6 6.Nf3 Bb4 7.Bd2= Is one book
continuation.
5...Qa5+ 6.c3?
Crowley: Bd2 is much better, gaining time and saving
the attacked pawn.
6...Nxe4 7.Qf3 Nf6 8.Qf4?! e5 9.Qd2 Ne4
"Tactics flow from a superior position".
10.Qd5 Qxd5 11.Bxd5 Nf6 12.Bb3
Black is clearly in control.
12...d5 13.h3?! Bc5 14.Ne2 0-0 15.0-0 Be6 16.Nd2
Rad8
Classic center domination.
17.a3 d4 18.Bxe6 fxe6 19.Nb3 Bb6 20.Bg5 h6 21.Bxf6
Rxf6 22.Rad1 d3 23.Ng3 Rf4 24.Nd2 Ne7 25.Nf3?
Just hastens the inevitable. 25.Nge4
25...e4 26.Nd2 e3 27.fxe3 Bxe3+ 28.Kh2 Bxd2 29.Rxd2
Rxf1 30.Nxf1 e5 31.Ng3 Kf7 32.Ne4 Ke6?
Black's edge is lost with this inaccuracy.
32...Nf5
33.Nc5+ Kf5
34.Rxd3
Crowley: "Anything but this. Nxd3 or Nxb7 would change
the fate of the day most likely." 34.g4+! Kf6 35.Rxd3; 34.Nxd3=;
34.Nxb7?-+ The pawns will soon be connected, and damned hard to deal
with.
34...Rxd3 35.Nxd3 e4 36.Ne1 Nd5 37.g3 Ne3 38.Kg1?
Nc4 39.Kf2 Nxb2 40.Ke2 Nc4 41.Nc2 g5 42.Ne3+?
White's last blunder.
42...Nxe3 43.Kxe3 h5 44.c4
Crowley: Fatal of course. But nothing would save the
game.
44...Ke5 45.a4 b6 46.g4 hxg4 47.hxg4 a6
And the black pawns are unstoppable. 0-1
Blackburne,J - Crowley,A [B45]
Blackburne simul Eastbourne, 1894
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 e6 5.Nc3 B45
Sicilian: Taimanov variation ~ as we now call it.
Crowley: "The usual move is Nb5, but Mr. Blackburne perfers
development to attack." 5.Nb5 B44 Sicilian: Szen (anti-Taimanov)
variation ~ as we would say.
5...Bb4?
Crowley: "Unwise." ....Because the trade is
forced.
6.Nxc6 bxc6 7.Qd4
OOB 7.Bd3 d5 Book.
7...Bxc3+ 8.bxc3 Nf6 9.Ba3 Qa5!
Crowley: "A strong counterattack." 9...d5
10.Bb4 + =
10...c5?
The sac is unsound. 10...Qb6 += At least
holds, and is probably best.
11.Bxc5 Nxe4
12.Bb4
12.Qxg7! Wins. It's hard to see how Blackburne missed
this. 12...Qxc5 (12...Qxc3+ 13.Qxc3 Nxc3 14.Bd4 + -) 13.Qxh8+ Ke7
14.Qd4 + -
12...Qd5
Crowley: "Better than Qf5 because of g3."
12...Qf5 13.g3
13.Qxd5
Forced.
13...exd5 14.Rd1 Bb7 += 15.Be2?!
15.Rb1 With counterattacking possibilities.;
15.Ba5 Is also good.
15...a5 16.Ba3 Nxc3 17.Rd3
17...Nxe2!
Crowley: "Perhaps better than taking the second pawn.
The two bishops are always dangerous and the pawn might have been
regained with the better game." 17...Nxa2
18.Re3+ Kd8 19.Kxe2! d4
Crowley: Temporary insanity.
20.Re7
20.Rg3 Is playable for the moment, but in the
long-term, the R is in an odd spot.
20...Re8
20...Bxg2 21.Rg1 At least loses black's edge by
permitting counterplay.
21.Rxe8+ Kxe8 22.Kd3 f6 23.Kxd4 Kf7
23...Bxg2?! 24.Rg1 Here actually hands the advantage,
and likely the game, back to white.
24.c3 Re8 25.Rb1 Bc6
Playing safe for the draw. 25...Bxg2! Will work
now.
26.c4 Re2!
Crowley: "This forces the exchange of rooks, and
consequently the draw. Bishops of opposite colors and pawns even can
result in nothing else." 26...Bxg2 Will still work, but with a
tough game against the Black Death, Crowley opts for the draw.
27.Rb2 Rxb2 28.Bxb2
Crowley: Mr. Blackburne proposed a draw which was
accepted.
28...Ke6= ½-½
The Wanderer of the Waste during his last years,
here showing a prized magical wand.
Crowley,A - NN [B30]
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.c3 g6 4.Bc4 e6 5.d4 cxd4 6.cxd4 Bg7 7.e5
d5 8.Bb5 Qa5+ 9.Nc3 a6 10.Bxc6+ bxc6 11.Bd2 Qc7 12.Ng5 f6 13.exf6 Nxf6
14.0-0 0-0 15.Qe2 e5 16.dxe5 Ng4 17.f4 Qb6+ 18.Kh1 a5 19.Na4 Qa7 20.e6 Nf6
21.Rac1 Ba6 22.Qe5 Ng4 23.Qe1 Bxf1 24.Nc5 Bc4 25.e7 Qxc5 26.Qe6+ Kh8 27.Nf7+
Rxf7 28.Qxf7 0-1
Crowley,A - Shoosmith,H [C37]
1894
1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.Bc4 C37 KGA: King's knight's
gambit 4...d6 5.0-0 h6 6.d4 Ne7 7.Nc3 Bg7 8.e5 OOB 8...d5 9.Bb3 c6 10.Ne2
Ng6 11.g3 g4 12.Nxf4 Nxf4 13.Bxf4 gxf3 14.Qxf3 Be6 15.c3 Nd7 16.Bc2 Nf8
17.Qh5 Qd7 18.Bd2 Bg4 19.Qh4 Ng6 20.Bxg6 fxg6 21.e6 Bxe6 22.Rae1 g5? 23.Qg4
0-0-0 24.Rxe6 h5 25.Qe2 h4 26.Bxg5 Rdg8?? 27.Re7 Qh3 28.g4 Bxd4+ 29.cxd4
Rxg5 30.Re8+ Rxe8 31.Qxe8+ Kc7 32.Qe7+ 1-0
Notes
1.
The except can be found on-line at
www.stonemirror.net/Pages/maugham.html
2.
A Moveable Feast, by Ernest Hemingway, 1966, Penguin. Chapter
9, p. 67-8.
3.
Two excellent sites for Thelema are
http://www.lashtal.com/nuke/
and
http://www.thelemicknights.org/acfhome.html
4.
A. A good time-line for the main events of Crowley’s life is
available at
http://www.lashtal.com/nuke/
B. The Biography Project has a good brief
intro to Crowley’s life here
http://www.popsubculture.com/pop/bio_project/aleister_crowley.html
C. For the astrologically-minded, the Great
Beast’s birth-chart is available here
http://www.khaldea.com/charts/aliestercrowley.shtml
D. If you want a standard bio, first, let the
man speak for himself: The Confessions of Aleister Crowley is
available through a number of publishers and can be read on-line at
http://www.hermetic.com/crowley/confess/index.html
E. The Great Beast, by John Symonds,
1971, Macdonald, is the first, and maybe the best, of the “second opinions”.
F. By the by, Aleister is Crowley’s reworking
of Edward Alexander.
5.
The Confessions, Chapter 3, p.48.
6.
Ibid., Chapter 9, p. 93.
7.
The EastBourne Gazette columns have recently been excavated and put
into pdf form! Again, my great thanks to the people at
http://www.lashtal.com/nuke/
8. The Confessions, Chapter 16, p. 140.
9. This proliferation of apocryphal Crowley games is, no doubt,
something good Aleister, himself an inveterate jokester, would appreciate.
That even reputable chess authorities are occasionally taken in is all the
more amusing. See for example how GM Larry Evans was taken to the
chessic cleaners at
http://www.worldchessnetwork.com/English/chessNews/evans/031201.php
(Sorry, this is just too funny. GMs should really get out more
often…)
10. Crowley wrote a series of detective tales featuring the
protagonist Simon Iff. The one here quoted is Big Game,
included in the excellent book by Sandy Robertson The Aleister Crowley
Scrapbook, 1988, Quantum. The Simon Iff tales are in print in
various additions, and some may be read on-line at
http://www.hermetic.com/crowley/simon_iff/index.html..
Also, a good
deal of the Crowley oeuvre may be found at
http://www.hermetic.com/crowley/
“Love is the Law,
Love Under Will.”
Past Pawns Index
|
search tips
The
Chessville
Chess Store
Chess
A Chess Book a Mortal can enjoy?
Like Learning a Face-Stomping Opening
over Beer and Onion Rings!
"...perfect opening
for non-masters
...many brutal muggings"
- IM Silman |
(Reviews,
Excerpts and
Comments Here.)
|
Reference
Center
The Chessville
Weekly
The Best Free
Chess
Newsletter
On the Planet!
Subscribe
Today -
It's Free!!
The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives
Discussion
Forum
Chess Links
Chess Rules
Visit the
Chessville
Chess Store
|