Chessville - by chessplayers, for chessplayers!
 

My Best Games
Volume Two

by Victor Korchnoi

Reviewed by Prof. Nagesh Havanur

Edition Olms, 2001 (2nd Edition available)
ISBN:  978-3-283-00405-7
hard cover, 204 pages
figurine algebraic notation

Also: the Professor's review of Volume One.

 

“It is a striking coincidence that a chess player with such an unparalleled eagerness to win should bear the first name, Victor.  No matter who is on the on the other side of the table, Korchnoi wants to win, with White, with Black, and as Najdorf would laughingly say, even with green pieces.”

– GM Svetozar Gligorich

As a matter of fact, Korchnoi is a virtuoso with Black pieces and a master of counterattack.  He has loved playing complex and difficult positions.  His penchant for complications has brought him a number of victories from exciting battles.  It is no wonder that his inspiration has always been Emanuel Lasker, who usually fought on the edge of the precipice.

In this second volume there are 50 games with Black.  The index of opponents reads like the Who’s Who in modern chess: Smyslov, Fischer, Karpov, Geller, Larsen, Timman, Gelfand and Ivanchuk, to name only a few.

It is a pity that only Kasparov is missing from the list.  Old-timers would recall that Korchnoi beat Kasparov in the first game of their Candidates’ Match in 1983.

The notes to the following game are based on Korchnoi's own annotations in the book.  I have also made grateful use of Kasparov's analysis in his book My Great Predecessors V.

Lev Polugaevsky  -  Victor Korchnoi  [D97]
USSR Championship 1960

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5

The Grünfeld Defence was a great favourite of Korchnoi in his youth.

4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Qb3 dxc4 6.Qxc4 0–0 7.e4








The Russian System was the main choice of  world champions, Botvinnik and Smyslov in the 1950s. Later it became a battleground in Karpov-Kasparov matches.

7...Na6

The Prins Variation.  It was rarely played in those days. At that time they mainly played the Smyslov Variation.

7...Bg4 8.Be3 Nfd7.  At present  the Hungarian variation (7....a6) is popular.

8.Be2 c5 9.d5 e6 10.0–0 exd5 11.exd5 Bf5








''To be honest, I like White's position and it would appear that he should have an advantage.  But Polugaevsky was not able to demonstrate an advantage.''  - Korchnoi

12.a3

''After the game I judged this to be a weak move, and the reason for White's loss of an opening advantage.  Meanwhile it is not all so simple....... In some variations a2-a3 turns out to be a useful move; it restricts the movements of the knight at a6 - the main problem of Black's position.'' -Korchnoi.

But this is a slow plan and it is better for White to complete his development according to Kasparov.  White has more active continuations like 12.Bf4, 12.Rd1 and 12.Be3.

12...Re8 13.Rd1

In a 1997 game the subtle chess grandmaster David Bronstein played 13.Bf4 Ne4 (Not 13...Nxd5? 14.Nxd5 Re4 15.Bg5!+-) 14.Nb5! Bxb2 15.Rab1! with excellent play for White.

13...Ne4 14.Be3 Nd6








One of the drawbacks to White's position is that it is hard for his queen to find an active, and at the same time, secure post - it everywhere comes under attack by the Black pieces.

15.Qf4!?

''In a joint analysis after the game the two sides came to the conclusion that the queen move was a poor one, and that White should have played 15.Qb3 Nc7 16.a4=.

Now I am inclined to think differently.  The queen move is not bad.  It is more aggressive.  In some cases Bxa6 followed by Bxc5 is threatened, and in some cases Nb5 will also be unpleasant, exchanging the piece that is blockading the d5 pawn. '' - Korchnoi

15...Ne4! 16.Nb5

''The best move.  Polugaevesky sacrifices a pawn in order to reactivate his pieces.'' - Korchnoi

But Kasparov does not agree.

Not 16.Bxa6 bxa6 17.Na4 Qa5 18.Nxc5 Nxc5 19.b4 Qd8!  And Black has the upper hand.  - Kasparov

Or 16.Rac1? Nxc3 17.bxc3 Re4 18.Qg3 Rg4 19.Qh3 Rd4 White loses his d-pawn.  - Korchnoi

So what should White play?

16.Bd3!

After  16...Bxc3 17.bxc3 Nxc3 18.Qh6  Korchnoi offers  two continuations 18...Nxd1 and 18...Qf6.  Both are refuted by Kasparov.

a) 18...Nxd1 19.Ng5 Qxg5 20.Bxg5! Re1+ 21.Bf1 Bd3 22.h3!  No one noticed this quiet move.   22...Rxf1+ 23.Kh2 Nc7 24.Bf6 Ne8 25.Be7 Nc7 26.Bxc5 Nxd5 27.Bd4 f6 28.Qd2! and the mobile white queen is stronger than the uncoordinated army of black pieces.

b) 18...Qf6 19.Bxf5 Nxd1 (19...Qxf5 20.Ng5+-) 20.Rxd1 Qxf5 21.Ng5 Rad8 22.Qxh7+ Kf8 23.Re1+-

16...Bxb2








17.Ra2

Korchnoi approves this move.  But this move cannot be right as the rooks lose coordination. - NSH  Kasparov rightly recommends 17.Rab1 Bg7 18.g4 (18.Bd3 Qxd5 19.g4 Nxf2!) 18...Bd7 19.Bd3 and now:

a) 19...Bxb5 20.Bxe4 Nc7 21.Ng5 Qd7 22.d6 Rxe4 practically forced. (22...Re6 23.Bd5!) 23.Qxe4 Bc6 24.Qf4 Re8 25.h3 with a complicated game, but the passed d -pawn allows White to face the future with confidence. '' - Kasparov

b) 19...Qf6 20.Qxf6 Bxf6 21.g5 The knight at b5 and the d-pawn cramp Black's position.  For the moment his extra pawn is not felt, and the position is one of dynamic balance'' - Kasparov

17...Bg7 18.Bc4








Presumably White had been planning to to continue 18.d6, but then rejected it because of 18...Be6 19.Qxe4 Bxa2 20.Qxb7 Qb6! 21.Qxb6 axb6 when he has insufficient compensation for the lost material, e.g. 22.Nc7 Nxc7 23.dxc7 Rec8 24.Bf4 Bb3 and Black has the upper hand.  But now the bishop on c4 cuts off the white queen's retreat.

Korchnoi suggests 18.h3, but this is met by Kasparov's line 18...Qa5! (threatening ...Nb4) 19.Nd2 (19.Bc4 Qa4 20.Rc1 Bd7 Black has a comfortable game.) 19...c4! 20.Bxc4 Qa4.

18...Nf6!

Intending both...Nh5 and...Re4.  What an amazingly agile knight!  (Kasparov)

19.Nd6

White had two reasonable moves 19.Qd6 and 19.Qg3 with which he could have drawn according to Korchnoi.  But neither is satisfactory according to Kasparov:

a)19.Qd6 Qa5! followed by...Rad8 is very strong.

b) 19.Qg3 Re4 20.Be2 (20.Bd3? Rg4) 20...Nh5 21.Qd6 Bd7! in both cases with initiative for  Black.

So Kasparov suggests 19.Ng5!? h6 (19...Nh5?! 20.Qf3 h6 21.Nxf7 Qd7 22.d6 is dangerous for Black.) 20.Nxf7 Kxf7 21.Nd6+ Kf8 22.Nxe8 Qxe8.  Black has two passed pawns for a rook, but White's powerful passed pawn gives him equal chances.

19...Nh5 20.Nxb7 Qc8 21.Qd6

''After 21.Nd6? Qb8! White would have lost either his knight or his queen -without sufficient compensation.'' - Korchnoi.

Kasparov, however, suggests 22.Qxf5! gxf5 23.Nxe8 Qxe8 24.Bxa6 Qa4 25.Be2 with saving chances.  Black would nevertheless retain an advantage with 25...Nf6! according to him.

21...Nb8!








Now both...Qxb7 and...Bf8 trapping the queen are threatened. Black is winning.

22.Bb5

If 22.h3 with the idea of returning the queen to h2, there would have followed 22...Qxb7 23.g4 Bb1.

22...Rxe3!

''Avoiding a clever trap. 22...Bf8? 23.Bxe8 Bxd6 24.Nxd6 and the picture changes sharply.'' - Tal

23.fxe3 Bf8

''The immediate 23...Qxb7 24.Bc6 (24.Qxc5 Nf6) 24...Qb6 is also possible.'' - Kasparov

24.Qd8

If 24.Qe5 Qxb7 25.Rb2?! (25.e4 Qxb5 26.exf5 Nd7–+ Kasparov.) 25...Nd7 26.Bc6 Qc8 (26...Qxc6!? -Kasparov) 27.Qc3 Bg7 28.Qd2 Bxb2 29.Bxa8 Qxa8 30.Qxb2 Nhf6 etc.

24...Qxb7








25.Bc4

More tenacious was 25.Rb2 Nd7 26.Bc6 or 26.Bxd7.- Korchnoi.  Both, however, lose in the long run.:

26.Bc6 Qxb2 27.Qxa8 Qxa3–+ Kasparov; or 26.Bxd7Qxb2 27.Qxa8 Bxd7–+ Kasparov

25...Nc6! 26.Qh4

After 26.dxc6 Rxd8 27.cxb7 Rxd1+ 28.Kf2 Bd6–+ the b7 pawn is not supported by the White pieces and is soon lost.(28...Rb1 29.Bd5 Be6–+)

26...Na5 27.Bf1 Qb3 28.Rad2 Qxe3+ 29.Kh1








29...Be7?

Both sides were involved in a fierce time scramble....here Black should have prevented the advance of the d-pawn by 29...Nb7! - Korchnoi

30.Qa4 Qc3

The only defence against the threats of Re2 and Qxa5 according to Korchnoi.  But  30...Bd8!? Is also possible and could have been better. - Kasparov.

31. d6 Bf6 32.d7

If 32.Rd3 Bxd3 33.Rxd3 Qc1 34.Rd1 Qh6! –+









Analysis Diagram: after 34.Qh6

Or 32.g4 Qxf3+ 33.Bg2 Qxg4 34.Qxg4 Bxg4 35.Bxa8 Bxd1 36.Rxd1 Nb3!–+; 32.Bd3! was more tenacious. - Kasparov

32...Rd8 33.Re2 Kg7 34.Kg1 Qb3 35.Qxb3 Nxb3 36.h3 Ng3 37.Re3 Nxf1 38.Rxb3 Bc2 0–1

''A classic example of counterattack.'' - Kasparov

On Korchnoi’s 75th birthday two years ago, Kasparov paid him a rich tribute, quoting Bernard Shaw:

'We don’t stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing.'  While Shaw was no fan of chess he could have been talking about our game’s evergreens, Korchnoi and Smyslov.  Hail, gentlemen!”

One can only say amen to that.

Highly Recommended.
 

Index of all Reviews


Chess Books
& Equipment

 


 



The
Chessville
Chess Store

 

Advertisement


Advertisement


The
Chessville
Weekly

Newsletter

Subscribe
Today -

It's Free!!

The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives


Advertise
with
Chessville!!

Advertise to
thousands
of chess
fans for
as little
as
$25.

Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each


From the
Chessville
Chess Store



 


 


From the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

This site is best viewed with Java-Enabled MS Internet Explorer 6 and Netscape 6 browsers set at 800x600 screen size.

Copyright 2002-2008 Chessville.com unless otherwise noted.