^ Click here to remove ads! ^

Book Openings

  Flip board

Comments:

by Elubas - 5 hours ago
Buffalo United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 2

I always thought of Bird's opening to be offensive because the fianchetto points to a king side castled king and the f4 pawn could be used for attack at some point.

by movebymove1313 - 12 days ago
Pembroke, Pines Fla Colombia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 1

THANK GOD FOR CHESS.COM, LOVE THE SITE.

ABOUT THE OPENING MOVE, IM STILL NOT SURE.

by __Mac__ - 13 days ago
Toronto Canada
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 1

I used this opening to beat the bot on this site set to hard.  Its one of the only openings that worked for me against the computer for a while.  Very defensive in the first 10 moves.

by piotr96 - 17 days ago
woonsocket,ri United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 43

its the same idea as c4 people

by Crux - 37 days ago
Malling Denmark
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 81
This is not a bad opening for white. GrandMaster Henrik Danielsen from Iceland has developed his "Polar Bear system" which is always 1. f4. He probably knows more about the Dutch Defense than anyone else in the world, and he transferred the ideas to white, being a move ahead and everything. While Black may be able to equalize, there are many many good continuations for White, you could watch some of his videos on YT (user name: krakkaskak) on his system to gain insight. "The Polar Bear is not without danger!" -Danielsen
by Camer - 40 days ago
Turku Finland
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 13
White will not take any advantage with this opening... Black equalizes very easily.
by Chess_Champion26 - 46 days ago
British Columbia Canada
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 319
Why move the bird opening, it doesn't do SQUAT!
by BirdBrain - 50 days ago
KY United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 468
The point behind the opening is that White (according to Henry Bird's original idea) is planning on controlling the e5 square and fianchettoing his queenside bishop, while not blocking the diagonal with a move like d4.  It is not a bad opening, but as my teacher taught me, it is a defensive opening.  White is staking his claim upon the e5 square, and so his development scheme should work likewise.  It is a flexible opening, and many players disrespect the opening, so they do not study it. Therefore, a person who regularly uses 1. f4 understands the middlegame plans much better than his opponent, so he is better in that sense.  White shouldn't have a problem with at least equality.
by Philosophical - 50 days ago
St. Louis, Missouri United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 17
Any opening where black has the statitistical advantage needs to be scrutinized and maybe avoided.  If master players lose with this opening more than they win, then a neophyte like me will most definitely avoid it.
by PlyrMava - 51 days ago
Oregon United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 110
i don't know what the point is in using this opening but if anybody likes this opening try it but test it first, it looks like itll make you very vulnerable on the kingside and you might have to queen side castle, which might not be available because black usually goes for the center and queenside. it could probably throw someone off and make them cautious not knowing what you might do so it could work....I don't know, anyone who has some luck with this opening let me know.
by Nivek07 - 54 days ago
New Hampshire United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 1
SmileGreat site!!!
by white_rose1 - 57 days ago
Dubai United Arab Emirates
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 1

HI

 


by irok - 57 days ago
Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 1

hi

 


Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.