< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing > |
Dec-29-02 |
| ughaibu: It seems churlish to criticise the loser's play merely on account of the result but Shirov's g4 before Polgar has played Nf6 looks rather negative to me. |
|
Dec-30-02
|
| Sneaky: No, 6.g4 is the line. I think it transposes into the Keres Attack. |
|
Dec-30-02 |
| ughaibu: I just looked in the 'games similar' and of players I've heard of Shirov seems to be the main proponent of this move. I dont see the point of it before the knight is on f6, particularly if he's going to follow up with Nb3 allowing black a straightforward queen side fianchetto(?). |
|
Feb-25-03 |
| kostich in time: This is probably Polgars Immortal Game...the sudden counterattack with g5!! and h5!!could not have been the result of home analysis.This si one of Blacks all-time Sicilian wins |
|
Feb-25-03 |
| CaissaKnight: Actually, the sudden counter attack was home prep, at least g5. I believe it is mentioned in the Greatest 100 Games by Nunn, Emms, and Burgess |
|
Aug-08-04
|
| notyetagm: Centralized knights kill. |
|
May-09-05 |
| de schaar: what's the continuation? |
|
May-18-05
|
| Richard Taylor: This is a great game! The attack came out of nowhere - using the pawn strike to break Shirov's pawns to get the knights into the into the centre ! |
|
Jun-01-05
|
| LIFE Master AJ: A great contest, this is now my favorite Polgar game! |
|
Aug-27-05 |
| blackjacki2: <what's the continuation?> yes, anyone know? |
|
Aug-27-05 |
| THE pawn: 15.Ne3!! threatening mate. Awsome.
On the other hand, shirov's 15.Na5 was a blunder, he should have recentralised. |
|
Aug-28-05
|
| tpstar: I had Fritz 7 play it out on its highest level = 30. Kxc5 Rac8 31. Kc4 Rhd8 32. Kb3 Rb8+ 33. Kc4 Bd4 34. Bxd4 Nxd4 35. Rxa6 Rbc8+ = no big whoop. Shirov probably thought it was a technical win for Black, especially once the Rooks gain the second rank. Fritz hated 16. Na5 which gave Black a decisive advantage for the rest of the game. |
|
Aug-28-05
|
| WannaBe: This is game 6 in the book 'Chess: the art of logical thinking" by Neil R McDonald. His ending comment is this: "Here at last Shirov gave up as his king will suffer a fatal buffeting by the black rooks after 30. Kxc5 Bxc3 31. bxc3 Rhc8" |
|
Dec-19-05 |
| DeepPink: It is actually one of the games in their book - burgess,nunn and emms. it took "judit just 48 minutes, won the prize for the most important theoretical novelty of the tournament..." buenos aires, argentina 1994 |
|
Mar-28-06
|
| notyetagm: From the World's Greatest Chess Games:
<20 ... b3! This move frees the knight - a standard method of rescuing a cornered knight.> |
|
Apr-19-06
|
| LIFE Master AJ: Correct my earlier comment to read:
"This is now my favorite JUDIT Polgar game."
|
|
Sep-19-06
|
| notyetagm: Position before 16 ... e3!!:
click for larger viewCentralized knights kill. |
|
Jan-01-07 |
| Octavia: <tpstar> after your var, bl still wins by a big margin! |
|
Dec-27-07 |
| DarthStapler: This is one of my favorite games |
|
Sep-13-08
|
| whiteshark: User: kingscrusher annotated this game on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2VX... |
|
Sep-13-08
|
| whiteshark: Where are the improvements in this one? |
|
Sep-14-08 |
| clocked: Just give up the Queen with 15.exf5. Do any of the books mentioned above give serious consideration to this possibility? |
|
Sep-14-08
|
| whiteshark: <clocked> "15.exf5 Bxg2 16.Bxg2 Rxh5 " according to Shirov. Is that serious enough for you? |
|
Sep-14-08 |
| clocked: Shirov's evaluation may be have been superficial. 15.exf6 Bxg2 16.Bxg2 Rxh5!? 17.fxe6 leaves a very messy position with dangers for both sides. |
|
Sep-14-08
|
| whiteshark: Shirov had played this line just a few weeks before against no less than ... Shirov vs Kasparov, 1994 Judit said she had prepaired this line only 24 hours before the game. |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing > |