chessgames.com
Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4 (B21)
1 e4 c5 2 f4

Number of games in database: 1515
Years covered: 1620 to 2008
Overall record:
   White wins 36.4%
   Black wins 41.0%
   Draws 22.6%

Popularity graph, by decade

Search for sacrifices in this opening.
Explore this opening using the all-new Opening Explorer.
PRACTITIONERS
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Lawrence Day  42 games
Mark Hebden  35 games
Bent Larsen  20 games
Howard Staunton  22 games
La Bourdonnais  16 games
Ljubomir Ftacnik  8 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Zardus vs A Steventon, 1986
F Rechi vs E Grassi, 1986
Tal vs Neibult, 1991
Harris vs Silman, 1978
MacDonnell vs La Bourdonnais, 1834
MacDonnell vs La Bourdonnais, 1834
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 61; games 1-25 of 1,515  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Greco vs NN 1-021 1620 Miscellaneous GameB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
2. NN vs Greco 0-136 1620 Miscellaneous GameB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
3. G Atwood vs Philidor 0-140 1794 LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
4. G Atwood vs Philidor 1-040 1794 CasualB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
5. J Wilson vs G Atwood 0-131 1801 CasualB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
6. W Lewis vs J Wilson 1-042 1819 Lewis vs. WilsonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
7. W Lewis vs J Wilson 1-041 1819 Lewis vs. WilsonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
8. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 1-039 1834 London m5 ;HCL 18B21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
9. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 0-148 1834 London m5 ;HCL 18B21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
10. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 0-125 1834 London m5 ;HCL 18B21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
11. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 0-153 1834 London m5 ;HCL 18B21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
12. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 1-048 1834 London m6 ;HCL 18B21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
13. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 1-059 1834 London m6 ;HCL 18B21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
14. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 0-129 1834 LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
15. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 0-144 1834 LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
16. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 0-135 1834 LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
17. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 1-051 1834 LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
18. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 0-125 1834 LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
19. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 0-155 1834 LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
20. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais ½-½81 1834 LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
21. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 1-046 1834 LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
22. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 1-039 1834 MatchB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
23. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 1-051 1834 MatchB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
24. Bledow vs Von Der Lasa 1-038 1838 BerlinB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
25. Cambridge vs Nottingham City 0-134 1838 Match?B21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
 page 1 of 61; games 1-25 of 1,515  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Secrets of Opening Surprises

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·  Later Kibitzing >
Nov-24-06   zerathul: If u are a Sicilian player looking for a refutation of the Morra Gambit, this is the line for u

1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Nxc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 d6 6. Bc4 a6! 7. O-O Nf6

From now on, Black scores 60% or more in every sub-variation, in every database

Nov-24-06   jedrus07: Have a look at this line:
1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Nxc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 d6
6. Bc4 a6 7. O-O Nf6 8. Bg5 e6 9. Qe2 Be7 10. Rfd1 Qc7 11. Rac1 O-O 12. Bb3 h6 13. Bf4 e5 14. Be3 Qd8 15. Nd5 Nxd5 16. Bxd5 Bd7

Can you tell me any improvements for black play, because its morra and white stands better.

Nov-24-06   jedrus07: The upper message is the answer for zerathul msg about refutation (and follow his line)
Nov-24-06   zerathul: <jedrus07> sure i can ! with 8. Bg5 white is immediatly worse

1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Nxc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 d6 6. Bc4 a6 7. O-O Nf6 8. Bg5 e6 9. Qe2 h6 !

Black gets the initiative and he is a pawn up, White can play

10. Bh4 g5 11. Bg3 Nh5
Fritz 10 eval (-0.98) 16ply

10. Bf4 g5 11. Be3 Ng4
Fritz 10 eval (-0.42) 16ply

10. Be3 Ng4 11. Bd2 (if Bf4 g5 traspose to above) b5 Fritz 10 eval (-0.52) 16ply

10. Be2 Be7
Fritz 10 eval (-0.37) 16ply

10. Bxf6 Qxf6
Fritz 10 eval (-0.91) 16ply

Nov-24-06   jedrus07: Thank you for your reaply- it was highly inspiring so i had to check by myself if there is any good variation for white... And in my opinion there is! Fritz rates 10. Bd2 as not so good move, but i see that in your variation it is like forced, so i decided to begin with this one, not caring what Fritz has to say... And after just 5 moves by white my Fritz thinks that the white, despite being down a pawn has enough recompansation.

Have a look at this:

10. Bd2!? Be7 11. Rfd1 b5
12. Bb3 O-O 13. Bf4 Qc7 14. Rac1

I think this gambit is very complex and hard to evaluate even with Fritz at 16ply! :)

Nov-24-06   zerathul: 10. Bd2 Be7 11. Rfd1 b5
12. Bb3 Bb7 13. Bf4 g5 14. Be3 Ng4

black has strong center, control of dark squares, plan of playing b4 and still a pawn up

the big problem with the 8.Bg5 line is that black can force white to swap his dark square bishop or to relegate it to d2 where it's passive and block the d-file, then he can easily take the initiative on the queenside

don't assume black will castle too soon, experienced players don't do it if there is something better to do, expecially Najdorf players knows black king is generally happy in the center

other lines i'm aware of in the 6. ...a6 variations are not expecially better for white, black at worse get a small plus

Nov-26-06   HoopDreams: thats why white isnt supposed to play 8. Bg5? but hold off developing to see which square to go to
Nov-26-06   HoopDreams: <zerathul> there is no known refuation for smith morra gambit
Nov-26-06   Manic: I agree with <HoopDreams>, I believe there is no known refutation but while this opening is very dangerous with black, I hear (it's only a rumour) that it is unsound with best play, but you have to be a GM to refute it. It works extremely well at club level.
Nov-26-06   euripides: One of Nigel Davies' columns on chesscafe gave quite a nice discussion of how a strong player can deal with White's threats in the Morra, but as far as I remember he agrees it's quite effective in club chess.

Personally I prefer to send white back to the c3 Sicilian with Nf6.

Dec-04-06   zerathul: <HoopDreams> so post a line in the 6. ...a6 variation where white has some advantage
Dec-31-06   HoopDreams: <zerathul> 1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Nxc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 d6 6. Bc4 a6 7. Bg5 Nf6 8. Bxf6 gxf6 9. 0-0 e6 10. Nd4
Dec-31-06   HoopDreams: <euripides> yes this is the reason i dont play the smith morra anymore and play roman's grand prix attack instead....in almost all of my games people would never accept the gambit and it would get into c3 sicilian lines which i hated. I had studied lines on the smith morra so much from Hannes Langrocks new book but i never got to use them!!
Jan-01-07   HoopDreams: < Manic: I agree with <HoopDreams>, I believe there is no known refutation but while this opening is very dangerous with black, I hear (it's only a rumour) that it is unsound with best play, but you have to be a GM to refute it. It works extremely well at club level.> Smith Morra gambit is not unsound with best play, GMs cannot refute it
Mar-16-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Holden: Opening of the day, Smith-Morra. I play SM as my only response to 1...c5 in 5 min blitz or less. I don't mind a transposition to Alapin, which I intend to learn more about. The Alapin is a different kind of game, though.
Apr-06-07   atripodi: Isn't 2.d4 pretty much busted by 2...d5? Is there a line that's suitable for white?
Apr-06-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  ganstaman: <atripodi: Isn't 2.d4 pretty much busted by 2...d5? Is there a line that's suitable for white?>

Care to elaborate? I haven't heard of 1. e4 c5 2. d4 d5 yet, so I'd be mildly surprised if it's actually the 'refutation' of 2. d4.

Apr-06-07   atripodi: Woops, thats 2.f4, my mistake.
Apr-06-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  ganstaman: Oh, well then that would make sense.

However, 1. e4 c5 2. d4 d5 is a reversed Albin-Counter Gambit. I think it's good for white, but can certainly throw him off if he's not prepared, I'd imagine.

I played a game today that went 1. e4 c5 2. f4 d5 3. e5 Bf5 and my opponent whipped out the odd looking 4. Bd3. I'm not sure of the motivation behind that move, if there was any, but I'm pretty sure it's the wrong way to play it.

Apr-06-07   Astardis: Why are 2. d4 and 2. f4 put together in one opening? Isn't it a hell of a difference whether I play one or the other?
Apr-06-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  ganstaman: <Astardis: Why are 2. d4 and 2. f4 put together in one opening?>

They're put together in one ECO code. They certainly are different openings, but ECO codes are far from perfect.

May-16-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  refutor: gangstaman...1.e4 c5 2.f4 d5 3.e5 Bf5 4.Bd3 just gave you the best advanced caro-kann ever

a terrible line in the advanced caro is 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 Bf5 4.Bd3 Bxd3 5.Qxd3 e6 6.f4. you've got all the advantages of that line, but in addition you've played ...c5 in one move instead of two

May-21-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  kellmano: <atripodi: Isn't 2.d4 pretty much busted by 2...d5? Is there a line that's suitable for white?>

There's certainlly this one:

Deming vs Cornell, 1980

Seriously though, the position you menetion only appears seven times in the database here and has a bad score for black. A nice thing about this website is the way you can respond to questions over a year later.

May-21-08   Zygalski: Zerathul:
<If u are a Sicilian player looking for a refutation of the Morra Gambit, this is the line for u

1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Nxc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 d6 6. Bc4 a6! 7. O-O Nf6

From now on, Black scores 60% or more in every sub-variation, in every database>

7.0-0? is slightly wrong in this variation.
I think 7.Bg5! is better, for instance; 7...Nf6 8.Bxf6 gxf6 9.0-0 e6 10.Nd4! Gives White reasonable play & at worst is probably equal. Chessbase gives this:
P=13
1-0=5
0-1=5
1/2-1/2=3

Oct-21-08   Amarande: How about the direct 3 ... d3, attempting to spoil White's center pawn formation?

E.g.:

<1 e4 c5 2 d4 cxd4 3 c3 d3 4 Nf3> It seems to me to be profitable to White NOT to capture this pawn immediately. There is no real way for Black to support it, and neither Bxd3 nor Qxd3 seems really great - neither of these pieces wants to be at d3. Therefore, White holds off on taking Black's 're-gambit' pawn.

<4 ... Nc6 5 Be3 d6 6 Nbd2> Here we see the major positive effect of 4 ... d3. It forces White to make a choice - either he gives back tempo, or must place his pieces on less strong positions, giving Black an easy defensive game. If White instead goes in for the Maroczy formation with 6 c4 g6, again things are more comfortable for Black than in the normal Maroczy Bind, because White's Queen or KB will have to lose time or position due still to that need to recapture at d3.

As a result, IMO, 3 ... d3 most likely refutes the Smith-Morra, not in the sense of that the gambit is unsound but in the sense that it appears that any advantageous formation White can secure, could have been secured under better circumstances in some other variation.

<6 ... g6 7 Bxd3 Bg7 8 O-O Nf6 9 c4 Nb4!> Here we see the trouble with having to recapture on d3. White will have to either retreat this Bishop or allow it to be exchanged. If 10 Bb1, the QR is shut in for at least a few more moves and White will have to lose yet another move with the B in order to develop it. 10 Be2 may be strongest here, leading into probably a more traditional Maroczy situation; instead White decided to develop another piece to try to take advantage of Black's loss of time with the N.

In any case, White's Queen's wing would definitely have to suffer significant softening in order to prevent this intrusion by the Knight. a3 would be necessary, but then Black can make definite counter plans on the Q wing beginning with ... a5. After this ... a4 threatens, and White will have to make some form of Pawn concession on the Queen's wing however he addresses this, which gives Black the characteristic Sicilian counterplay.

<10 Qb3 Nxd3 11 Qxd3 0-0 12 Bd4!> A good idea, essentially pinning Black's Nf6 for a lengthy time, as Black can hardly afford to allow the Bg7 to be traded in the Dragon formation, as well his QN has been exchanged and ... e5 would definitely be faulty, leaving the d6 pawn a permanent weakness.

<12 ... Qc7 13 Rfd1 b6 14 e5?!> An attempt to capitalize on space in the center and superior development, but it also seems that this move weakens White's tough grip on d5, and disposes of Black's need to worry of a weakness at d6 should the e-pawn need to advance.

<14 ... dxe5 15 Bxe5 Qd7 16 Qxd7 Bxd7 17 a4 a5 18 b3 Bc6 19 Re1 e6 20 Rad1 h6> To at least restrict some of the mobility of White's Knights. Despite the two Bishops and the White Pawn majority being somewhat weakened by 17 a4, Black has difficulty coming up with a strong plan here; in particular he is hampered by the fact that moving the Knight results in Bxg7 and numerous King's wing square weaknesses.

<21 Nd4 Bb7 22 Nb5 Bc6 23 Bc7 Nd7 24 Ne4> In addition, Black has no good way to shut out White's Knights on the Q wing.

<24 ... Rac8 25 Rxd7?!> This leads to a favorable pawn formation on the Q wing in exchange for the Exchange. It seems strong but later apparently looks like it's only good for a drawn position. In any case however the position is mainly even and White has only a slight advantage at best.

<25 ... Bxd7 26 Bxb6 Bxb5 27 axb5 a4!> The Q side pawns look to be strong, but they are not strong enough. This move actually makes White's passed pawns even further outside, but it also removes the support of the rear b-pawn and leaves the remaining two pawns open to attack, it will turn out White can't consolidate them enough for a win.

<28 bxa4 Rxc4 29 a5 Rb4! 30 Nd6 Be5! 31 Bc5 Rb3 32 b6 Bxd6 33 Bxd6 Ra8!> An additional nicety - White has never had a chance to make luft, and this assures the draw, as one of the passed pawns must be lost; the other will be neutralized by returning the Exchange.

<34 Bc7>
If 34 Ra1?? Rxa5! or Rxb6! and Black even wins!

<34 ... Rxa5 35 b7 Rab5 36 b8Q Rxb8 37 Bxb8 Rxb8 1/2-1/2> A book draw - 4v3 all on the same side of the board can be won only under certain special circumstances, involving either a passed center pawn or pawns already very far advanced.

Jump directly to page #    (enter number from 1 to 7)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·  Later Kibitzing >
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | new kibitzing | chessforums | new games | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2008, Chessgames.com
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies