User talk:Northamerica1000
Content created & contributions | Accolades received | Promoted DYK nominations | Upload log |
Discussion closure log | XfD log | CSD log | Prod log |
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Northamerica1000. |
When replying on your own talk page, please feel free to notify me using the notifications system by linking my user name there. Thank you. |
When sending email, please also notify me using a {{You've got mail}} template. Thank you. |
Contents
- 1 TB
- 2 barnstar
- 3 Block request
- 4 Thank you!
- 5 A strange page move caused a AFD to go away it seems
- 6 Symphony
- 7 DYK for Chicken manure
- 8 This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2015)
- 9 WikiProject Breakfast
- 10 Tech News: 2015-09
- 11 TfD
- 12 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Sandwich: Great Eats from All 50 States
- 13 Fanelli Cafe
- 14 The Signpost: 25 February 2015
- 15 Disambiguation link notification for February 28
Archives |
---|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
TB[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hafspajen (talk) 13:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Hi Hafspajen: I may opine there eventually, and it's possible I may not. With three new relatively detailed/long discussion threads on the article's talk page this month, there's a lot to sift through, and I'm presently working in several other areas. As per the discussion there, a new Pastry of Denmark article could be created, although I feel that this title would be best used to summarize all pastries from Denmark, rather than one.
-
-
-
- For what it's worth, and as a side note, in contemporary times in the U.S., a "Danish" pastry is arguably a generic term for several types of pastries, which may differ from the original Danish pastry from Denmark. In my opinion, it's best to base the article upon the original Danish pastry, and include other types in the Varieties or other possible new section(s). NORTH AMERICA1000 13:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- How do the US pastry look like, that's what I would like to know. Hafspajen (talk) 13:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- The problem is that it is different even among the Scandinavian countries. This is about how it looks [www.lantmannen-unibake.com/Global/.../Butiksbakat] in Sweden. It is called Wienerbrød [1] [2] in Norway. In Finland is called viineri [3] and looks like this. In Denmark they have several types. How does US Danish look like? Hafspajen (talk) 13:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hafspajen: I hesitate to provide a definitive answer without performing adequate research, but here are some book links that provide more information:
- [4] (scroll up one page to beginning), [5], [6] (advertisement), [7], [8], [9]. NORTH AMERICA1000 14:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Very interesting. Nr 7 gives me that the classic filling is remonce. Hafspajen (talk) 14:48, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- New it was going to ***. They draged it to ANI. Hafspajen (talk) 23:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- North, I was thinking about this and I think that my cake-editorship ends here. You very kindly encouraged me and expressed support for my continued editing of cake articles, asked me to create more of them, but after this Danish pastry-experience - I will never edit any cake articles again. Appart from the fact that the wienerbröd (and a red link as you see) - the Swedish variety of this pastry - has indeed a huge cultural significance for us, Swedes, as a part of our variety of the the afternoon tea ceremony -Fika (coffee break) - something that other editors didn't understood - looks like everybody (incuding Floquenbeam and EdJohnston) thinks that we are all out of our minds. It might have been a culture shock - related issue, but this from now on will prevent me to enter cake territory again. I created one article, failed to make a point on an other, has been declared disruptve - and this is not my cup of tea. Never knew desserts make people react like this. I am very sorry but I will not create thos articles that I promised I will. I kinda agree with Floquenbeam comment here telling to one of the Danish pastry editors - I don't think interacting with you further would be of any use whatsoever; - I agree with him there. Hafspajen (talk) 12:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hafspajen: I hesitate to provide a definitive answer without performing adequate research, but here are some book links that provide more information:
- For what it's worth, and as a side note, in contemporary times in the U.S., a "Danish" pastry is arguably a generic term for several types of pastries, which may differ from the original Danish pastry from Denmark. In my opinion, it's best to base the article upon the original Danish pastry, and include other types in the Varieties or other possible new section(s). NORTH AMERICA1000 13:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
-
Do what you feel is best for yourself. However, I wouldn't extrapolate the situation that has occurred in re Danish pastry as likely to occur regarding all food articles. Actually, most food topics on Wikipedia are seriously lacking editors to expand and maintain present articles and create new ones. NORTH AMERICA1000 14:14, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
barnstar[edit]
The Chicken shit Barnstar | |
For taking my stubby stub and turning it into a nice little article. LadyofShalott 16:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC) |
- Hi LadyofShalott: Thanks. I have created a DYK nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Chicken manure. NORTH AMERICA1000 16:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! You should get co-creation credit as should MelanieN. :) LadyofShalott 16:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- LadyofShalott: Feel free to addend the nomination with the above, if you'd like. NORTH AMERICA1000 16:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Count me out. I only contributed to the article Chicken shit. I have no interest in this agricultural article. --MelanieN (talk) 16:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- See Chicken shit, where the slang term has been moved back to. NORTH AMERICA1000 18:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Count me out. I only contributed to the article Chicken shit. I have no interest in this agricultural article. --MelanieN (talk) 16:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- LadyofShalott: Feel free to addend the nomination with the above, if you'd like. NORTH AMERICA1000 16:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Block request[edit]
Him. Nasty username. Cheers, :) Anna F remote (talk) 01:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- Done. NORTH AMERICA1000 01:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you![edit]
Good morning! (at least it is morning where I am in Southern California). I wanted to first and foremost thank you for your numerous copyedits on pages I had recently worked on. Always great to have someone double check me and clean up my stupid typos. :-p I also wanted to talk with you and get your input about something. I noticed that you added a couple of lists to the US state fire department navigational boxes, such as the List of New York fire departments. I didn't realize that these lists existed so thanks for pointing them out! I'm curious whether you think these lists still serve a purpose. In my opinion these lists should really be deleted because they will never be complete. I was thinking of having them simply redirect to the state category, so for example List of New York fire departments would redirect to Category:Fire departments in New York since this category basically automatically updates.
I am still relatively new and learning the ways of Wikipedia. Thanks for your assistance! Your colleague, --Zackmann08 (talk) 16:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Zackmann08: The lists can include content that categories cannot, such as descriptions, images, references, external links, etc. For more information about lists relative to categories see WP:NOTDUP. Also, categories often don't receive many page views, and hence aren't used much. For example, see (check views), but ignore the most recent figures on the bar graph, which are skewed per the page views I have done there today. NORTH AMERICA1000 18:04, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- Ah good points! Thank you for pointing that out. :-) --Zackmann08 (talk) 18:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
A strange page move caused a AFD to go away it seems[edit]
So I marked this Martin Hristov (footballer, born 1997) as a duplicate article of a article that is up for a afd Hristov Martin. Instead of the user participating in this he just moved all of this and now the AFD is kind of messed up looking now. Not sure what to say. Wgolf (talk) 23:25, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- -Looks like it was fixed! Wgolf (talk) 23:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Wgolf. Yes, everything appears to be in order at this time for the most part. Martin Hristov (footballer, born 1997) (with the comma) now redirects to Martin Hristov (footballer born 1997), which was handled by Cryptic (diff). At the AfD discussion, Cryptic provided notes about some differences between the versions, with the redirected article perhaps needing more content merged to the redirect target. NORTH AMERICA1000 00:04, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Symphony[edit]
Hello, some time ago you launched a campaign to introduce WP standard referencing practice on Symphony, and if you will look at the Talk page you will see that your point of view carried the day and achieved (reluctant) consensus. Might it be appropriate for you to go ahead and make the change? Opus33 (talk) 23:43, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Opus33: I had performed this once before, but it was reverted, so I started the talk page discussion. Despite the rough consensus ("rough" per limited participation) at the discussion to use inline citations, I hesitate to perform the work again, because someone may very well come along and revert it again. NORTH AMERICA1000 17:16, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Chicken manure[edit]
On 23 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chicken manure, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that of all manures, chicken manure has the highest nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium content? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chicken manure. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2015)[edit]
Trailer Trash is a US derogatory term for poor people living in trailers or caravans. It appears that these trailer trash happen to live on a trailer park. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Ice cream parlour • Stadium Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
WikiProject Breakfast[edit]
I am trying to leave a message on the projects talkpage, but I can't edit it because it has Flow enabled. I then thought that if I removed the Flow template temporarily I could leave a message and restore the template, but what I removed was not the flow software, but some informative template, and then I wasn't able to restore it, and each edit I then made got worse, and I can't work out how to restore it, because the page doesn't behave normally and allow undo. Would you look into it for me, and repair the mess I made. And, if you know, could you tell me how to leave messages on flow enabled pages. Regards SilkTork ✔Tea time 14:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi SilkTork: Due to the interface at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Breakfast, I can't access it to edit. As such, I will notify people who work on Flow with talkback messages to this discussion in hopes to obtain input/resolution. NORTH AMERICA1000 16:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping, Northamerica1000. Hi SilkTork, I've partially fixed-up the header, and will now file bugs for the problems with the text-entry box not expanding properly, and the WikiProject banner template not saving as expected (visible <table> code). They'll be adding (undo) links to the history, soon (phab:T90073).
- As for posting a message in Flow, click on "Start a new topic" (screenshot) to begin. Please let me know if you have any other problems or questions. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 17:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Quiddity: Thanks very much for your fixes regarding this matter. NORTH AMERICA1000 17:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for sorting this guys. Sorry for the mess. And as regards clicking on "Start a new topic" - I tried that. I wrote in the box with the blue bar. Couldn't enter it onto the page when I finished. Tried the box below that. Again couldn't enter it onto the page. Tried writing in both boxes - using the one with the blue bar as a heading. Still couldn't enter it on the page. After banging my head on the wall three times I then tried removing the flow enabled template. SilkTork ✔Tea time 17:49, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- SilkTork: Rather than banging your head on a wall, you can try headbanging! NORTH AMERICA1000 17:53, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Tech News: 2015-09[edit]
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent software changes
- All new accounts are now global. [10]
- Your Meta user page is now shown if you don't have a user page on a wiki. You can report problems if you see any. You can ask a bot to delete your old user pages. [11] [12] [13]
Software changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since February 18. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from February 25. It will be on all Wikipedias from February 26 (calendar).
- It is now easier to see template fields in VisualEditor. The fields are bigger. [14]
- It is now easier to see when a button is disabled in VisualEditor. [15]
- Sometimes when you copy-pasted a template in VisualEditor, it was replaced by HTML. This problem is now fixed. [16]
- Tools in Labs will stop working for a few hours on February 24. [17]
Meetings
- You can read the notes from the last meeting with the VisualEditor team.
- You can join the next weekly meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meetings you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on February 26 at 00:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- At the moment you need to log in to edit Wikimedia wikis on mobile devices. You can say if anyone should be allowed to edit on the mobile sites. The discussion ends on March 15.
- Images in the interface will soon work better in Opera 12. [18]
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
TfD[edit]
NA, I think you're pretty clever and geeky. Can you have a look at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Requests_for_closure#Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion.2FLog.2F2014_November_29? Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_November_29#Template:Grey_line looks like no consensus, Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_November_29#Template:Infobox_Electoral_reform is a pretty clear delete. Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_November_29#Template:Infobox_gunpowder_plotter is tricky, probably no consensus, and God only knows what Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_November_29#Template:Quotation results in. I'd ask Plastikspork but they're on the Bahamas, I think, and I'd do some myself but I don't know the process. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure is a bit backlogged and poor Cunard is running out of coffee and carbohydrates, I fear. Drmies (talk) 17:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Drmies: I'll keep the suggestions in mind. I have a pretty full plate with various present and planned activities, so I may not get to these. One person can only do so much, and I don't want to burn out by trying to cover to many things at once. NORTH AMERICA1000 20:48, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Sandwich: Great Eats from All 50 States[edit]
Hi Northamerica1000. You added sources to and de-prodded American Sandwich: Great Eats from All 50 States, which is now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Sandwich: Great Eats from All 50 States. Cunard (talk) 20:40, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Cunard: Thanks for the notification. NORTH AMERICA1000 16:00, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Fanelli Cafe[edit]
Thank you for the barnstar — very kind of you. Yeah, I was completely surprised that Fanelli didn't already have an entry. But then, neither did the Empire Diner until I added it not all that long ago. Go figure! --Tenebrae (talk) 01:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Tenebrae: Thanks again for creating Fanelli Cafe, as well as Empire Diner back in the day. NORTH AMERICA1000 16:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 February 2015[edit]
- News and notes: Questions raised over WMF partnership with research firm
- In the media: WikiGnomes and Bigfoot
- Traffic report: Fifty Shades of... self-denial?
- Recent research: Gender bias, SOPA blackout, and a student assignment that backfired
- Gallery: Far from home
- WikiProject report: Be prepared... Scouts in the spotlight
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 28[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Akple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corn flour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)