Replacing
fossil fuels:
|
||
Discussion | advertising disclaimer |
|
A big power station | ||
Scale of the problem | ||
Variation of supplywind energy | ||
Variation of demand | ||
The storage problem | ||
Energy accounting (EROEI) | ||
Fuel usage efficiency | ||
Table: Fuel usage efficiency | ||
|
||
Notes:
To understand the problems in replacing fossil fuels, it is necessary to look at several variables. |
advertising disclaimer |
A big power stationThere are 8760 hours in one year. Therefore, a nuclear power station with a
1,000 megawatt
(MW) generating capability, working at 100%
capacity, I am taking a 1000MW (1GW) plant as a standard unit. This I am also calling a big power station. 1 tonne oil equivalent equates to 12 megawatt hours
(MWh) electricity. Thus, a 1000 MW power station, using oil as its
energy source, would consume In the real world, however, controllable power-generating equipment (that uses coal, oil or nuclear fuel) only works at 80 85% capacity, after downtimes and peak demands are taken into account.
|
Scale of the problemBuried fossil fuels are like a great bank account from the past, from which currently we are drawing down reserves at a horrendous and unsustainable rate through our profligate burning of fossil products. (To the problems caused by this depletion of fossil fuel reserves must be added the problems of the filthy mess that most fossil fuel usage generates.) It is important to grasp the vast quantities of energy being used for sustaining modern civilisation. It will probably take the reader some time, and imagination, to adjust to this. A table providing figures for several countries in terms of big power stations is available here. For more numbers and analysis, and potential costs, see The delivery of power. Here is a brief assessment for the United States of America, by far the most extravagant user on the planet.
A simple outline on the scale of energy consumption
can be found here.
|
Variation
of supply
|
Variation of demandDemand for power is not even and steady, nor is it completely predictable. There is greater demand for power in winter, for heating, and there is more requirement for lighting homes, offices and streets when the sun goes down, while a manufacturing plant may be shut down at night. Patterns of demand may be imagined as similar to road systemsthere are rush-hours, while at 4 a.m. the roads are nearly empty. A generating capacity designed to meet peak loads will be lying idle much of the time, thus wasting resources; or, otherwise, may be described as being economically inefficient. The ideal situation would be to operate expensive plant 24 hours a day and every day of the year, so that the money (capital) invested in the plant was always paying its way. |
The storage problemIf energy is not wanted immediately, for instance to switch on a light, some means of storage of energy required for later use has to be achieved. A battery, a dam, a gallon of petrol, a hydrogen fuel cell, a log for the fire, or radioactive sources, are all means of storing power/energy. Learn to think clearly about the difference between generating and storing power.
|
Energy
accounting—
|
[With some references from Greg Hennessey, Lavigne, the Enlightenment] |
Fuel usage efficiencyThe following table attempts to give some impression of the fuel-use efficiency of various countries. The higher the number in the fourth column, the greater the the fuel-use efficiency in that country. What is particularly striking is the low usage efficiency of the United States. However, there are many possibilities that could make such a table misleading. A country producing low added-value goods or having a large subsistence farming sector, with cheap labour inputs, could appear more energy efficient than a country producing high-technology goods. There are also issues such as the low monetarisation of many less advanced countries, and the high purchasing premium on reserve currencies, especially the $US . But a major factor must be the low taxes on fuel in the United States, and even subsidies for fuel use; for more see Transportable fuels. With such apparently cheap fuel, market signals are bound to go out that do not encourage conservation. In Europe, there are high taxes on fuel usage, thus there are strong pressures to conserve. |
advertising disclaimer |
Fuel usage efficiency |
|||||||
country | GDP
(PPP) |
energy
usage in big
power station (1
GW) equivalents [GWeq] |
energy efficiency GDP/GWeq |
produced
electricity in big
power station (1 GW) equivalents [GWeq] |
country’s population (in millions) | average
installed electricity usage per person [1] (in KW) |
|
India | 2.66 | 431.1 | 6.17 | 56.8 | 1045 | 0.054 |
|
Denmark | 0.1498 | 25.9 | 5.78 | 3.7 | 5 | 0.74 | |
Brazil | 1.34 | 237.8 | 5.63 | 38.4 | 176 | 0.218 | |
Japan | 3.45 | 704.8 | 4.90 | 110 | 125 | 0.88 | |
China | 5.56 | 1150 | 4.83 | 149.8 |
1286 | 0.117 | |
UK | 1.47 | 306.9 | 4.79 | 39.5 | 58 | 0.68 | |
Germany | 2.174 | 459.2 | 4.73 | 57.9 | 82.4 | 0.703 | |
France | 1.51 | 351.2 | 4.30 | 47.4 | 58 | 0.817 | |
Spain | 0.757 | 184.4 | 4.11 | 24.0 | 40.2 | 0.597 | |
USA | 10.082 | 3065 | 3.29 | 411.2 | 290 | 1.418 | |
Canada | 0.923 | 375.9 | 2.46 | 57.6 | 31 | 1.858 | |
Russia | 1.2 | 880.9 | 1.36 | 88.2 | 144.5 | 0.61 | |
2001 figures | from CIA factbook | from BP p.37 2001 figures x conversion factor [2] | (col.1/col.2) *1000 | 2001 data from 'world total net electricity consumption'/ conversion factor [3] | from CIA factbook | col5/col6 | |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
|
email abelard at abelard.org © abelard, 2003, 1 february the address for this document is http://www.abelard.org/briefings/replacing_fossil_fuels.htm 2700 words |
latest | abstracts | briefings | information | headlines | resources | interesting | about abelard |