Chessville
...by Chessplayers, for Chessplayers!
Today is


Site Map

If you have disabled Java for your browser, use the Site Map (linked in the header and footer).

Chessville
logo by
ChessPrints

 


Advertise
with
Chessville!!

Advertise to
thousands
of chess
fans for
as little
as
$25.

Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each.



From the
Chessville
Chess Store



 


 


From the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

 

 

 

An Opening Repertoire for the
Positional Player

by S. Evan Kreider

The purpose of this article is not to teach any openings (though our site will include such content in the near future), but rather to help the positional player decide upon a set of openings which form a consistent and efficient repertoire, as well as to direct the player to resources from which to learn these openings. I have selected this particular repertoire based on the following criteria: a) it is suitable for the positional player (i.e., it avoids sharp tactical struggles in favor of more strategic battles); b) it is suitable for the amateur player with a reasonable but limited amount of time and energy to devote to study (i.e., most if not all amateur players); c) it results in positions which are good (or at least equal) for White; d) it results in positions which are equal (or only minimally and reasonably disadvantageous) for Black; e) it contains various structurally and strategically similar lines, when possible; and f) it is relatively natural and intuitive to play.

[N.B.: I have linked relevant opening lines to an interactive board which will open in a new window for you to follow along with the move list in each description. Simply click on the relevant link, follow along using the VCR style buttons or by clicking on the moves in the move list, and then close the window when you are through.]

Although 1.d4 is the usual recommendation for the positional player, I suggest 1.c4 instead. It can be just as sound and positional as many 1.d4 lines while still providing ample opportunity to secure an advantage. It also avoids the immense theory and diversity of the 1.d4 openings.

More specifically, I recommend the accelerated fianchetto variation of the English opening (1.c4, usually followed by 2.g3, 3.Bg2, and 4.Nc3). There’s less theory involved with this variation than others in the English family. It also has the advantage of being a bit less well-know than other openings – below Expert level, relatively few players use the English, much less the accelerated fianchetto variation, so most of your opponents probably won’t be too familiar with it. It’s a solid yet active opening and it’s also very flexible, allowing a wide variety of plans for White including central expansion, queenside play, or a King-side attack.

There are two excellent books available which cover this opening. The first is GM Tony Kosten’s The Dynamic English (Gambit Publications, 1999). It has received good reviews from Silman and Bauer, among others, and I myself have read it and think it is excellent. Kosten makes a serious effort to communicate not just brute variations, but also the important concepts, plans, and strategies behind the opening. He teaches you to play the opening by understanding it, and not simply by memorizing tons of abstract variations. This is especially important since most of your opponents (other amateurs, presumably) are likely to go “out of book” rather early.

The second is GM Andrew Soltis’ Winning with the English Opening, revised third edition (Chess Digest, 1997). Soltis has a reputation for turning out some poor opening books, but this one is a well-recognized exception, as long as you get the third edition and stay away from the earlier two.

Both of these are repertoire books, and so provide you with everything you’ll need to know to face Black’s wide variety of replies to the English. The primary difference between the two is that Kosten chooses more “dynamic” lines (though they are still quite positional – after all, this ain’t 1. e4!), while Soltis chooses somewhat quieter lines. I highly recommend buying both if you can afford to do so. That way, you can pick and choose among different lines that you find work best for you or that you’re most comfortable playing.  If you're a die-hard positional player, you'll probably lean towards Soltis' approach more than Kosten's; and among Soltis' lines, you may favor those involving central expansion or queenside play over those involving the kingside pawn-storm (especially those which can arise from the Botvinnik variation).

For the most part, I approve of their repertoire suggestions. In my experience, the vast majority of amateur players respond to 1.c4 with 1…e5, against which I have found that the accelerated fianchetto English practically plays itself. However, I’m not quite as fond of this variation against 1.c4 c5. It’s certainly playable, but it’s easy for Black to maintain symmetry safely for a long time, and it’s not always obvious when and how White should break the symmetry. As an alterative line, you might consider 1.c4 c5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4. Theoretically, it probably doesn’t contain much advantage for White, but it does at least provide a way to break the symmetry early on in a safe but active manner.

Now for a Black repertoire: Against 1.e4, the French Defense is an excellent choice. It’s a sound, positional system with plenty of scope for counter-play. It avoids the dense theory of the Sicilian or Spanish while still containing enough variety to hold interest after years of play. It’s also a very flexible system which provides Black with several variations from which to choose. Among these, the Winawer tends to involve some of the most tactical lines of the French (for example, the Poisoned Pawn variation of the Winawer), so you may want to avoid it in favor of something like the Rubinstein, which is probably Black's most solid approach. The Classical is balanced option, but can still become somewhat tactical depending on the particular lines White and Black might choose.  To begin with, I'd recommend the Rubinstein, with the possibility of expanding to the Classical someday if you deem it appropriate.

Of course, White has other options besides the main line. You’ll also have to be prepared to face the Tarrasch (unless you avoid it with the Rubinstein), the Advance, and a few other minor variations (for example, the Exchange and the King’s Indian Attack). The only book you’ll need to learn the fundamentals of all of the above is Neil McDonald’s & Andrew Harley’s Mastering the French with the Read and Play Method (Batsford, 1997). For those of you not familiar with Batsford’s Mastering series, each book teaches you how to play the respective opening by analyzing the typical pawn structures of each variation and examining their typical plans, tactics, and strategies. It also provides a fair amount of theory via example games. I highly recommend this book.

If and when you’re ready for more intense theory, you’ll want to check out Stephen Pedersen’s two volume work on the French; namely, The Main Line French: 3. Nc3 (Gambit, 2001) and The French: Tarrasch and Other Lines (Gambit, forthcoming). These two books comprise a thorough and current survey of French theory, and will probably be the only other books you’ll ever need on the French. (At least, unless later updated editions come out!)

[Chessville’s very own David Surratt is also in the midst of writing an excellent series of instructional articles on the French which you can check out here.]

Against 1.d4, I recommend playing 1…e6. Don’t be surprised if your opponent transposes to the French after 2.e4 – that’s what you want! This will occur in about a quarter of your games. Just follow up with 2…d5. It’ll put you back on familiar territory, and probably not be what your opponent expected.

If your opponent responds with 2.c4, then play 2…d5 and enter the Queen’s Gambit Declined. The QGD has a bit of a bad reputation among amateurs, but I think this is because they are mostly familiar with those old, drawish Classical Orthodox variation games. However, there are plenty of other approaches to the QGD which give Black more opportunity for counter-play while still maintaining a positional character. Furthermore, it’s always important to remember that classifications such as “drawish” or “lacking counter-play for Black” are usually by and for GMs. At the amateur level, there are going to be so many tactical and positional mistakes by both players that there will always be winning chances for both sides. The important thing is to play an opening which you like, and that suits your style. So if you like to play a solid, positional game, then the QGD is for you.

An excellent book to learn the QGD is Matthew Sadler’s Queen’s Gambit Declined (Everyman, 2000). Sadler is (in my humble opinion . . .) one of the best writers of instructional chess books today. He goes to great lengths to explain the important plans, tactics, and strategies behind the opening moves, while still providing enough theory to keep you happy for a long time. Furthermore, he covers a variety of approaches to the QGD, including the Lasker, Orthodox, and Tartakower variations of the main line, as well as the Exchange variation and Bf4 lines. He doesn’t cover the solid-but-active Cambridge Springs defense, so if that particular line interests you, you’ll have to look elsewhere – I believe Gambit will be publishing a book on this variation sometime soon.

Another good thing about the QGD is that you can play a QGD-type set-up against many of White’s non-1.e4 and non-QGD openings, such as the Catalan, the London System, the Colle, the English, the Reti, and most others as well. This requires some critical thinking about the best move order in each case, but most of the time you will be able to create a solid and familiar QGD-like position. This may not always be the theoretically best approach, but 9 times out of 10 you’ll take your opponents out of book early and play the resulting positions better due to your greater familiarity with the pawn structures and typical attacks & plans springing from them. Later on, if and when you decide to, you can learn some of the “real” responses against these lines. Among them, you may want to look at some of White’s Bg5 systems first – they’re the least friendly to the QGD-type set-up.

These lines should provide the positional chess player with plenty of opportunities for sound and active play. Enjoy!

Copyright 2002 S. Evan Kreider.  Used with permission.


search tips

The
Chessville
Chess Store

 



Reference
Center


The Chessville
 Weekly
The Best Free

Chess
Newsletter
On the Planet!

Subscribe
Today -

It's Free!!

The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives


Discussion
Forum


Chess Links


Chess Rules


Visit the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

Home          About Us          Contact Us          Newsletter Sign-Up          Site Map

 

This site is best viewed with Java-Enabled MS Internet Explorer 6 and Netscape 6 browsers set at 800x600 screen size.

Copyright 2002-2008 Chessville.com unless otherwise noted.