chessgames.com

TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Howard Staunton Memorial Tournament

Michael Adams8/11(+5 -0 =6)[view games]
Loek Van Wely7.5/11(+4 -0 =7)[view games]
Jan Smeets7/11(+5 -2 =4)[view games]
Jan Timman6.5/11(+3 -1 =7)[view games]
Ivan Sokolov6/11(+2 -1 =8)[view games]
Erwin L'Ami6/11(+2 -1 =8)[view games]
Jan Werle5.5/11(+3 -3 =5)[view games]
Jonathan Speelman5.5/11(+2 -2 =7)[view games]
Nigel Short5.5/11(+2 -2 =7)[view games]
Peter K Wells5/11(+1 -2 =8)[view games]
Alexander Cherniaev3.5/11(+1 -5 =5)[view games]
Robert Wade0/11(+0 -11 =0)[view games]

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Van Wely vs Speelman 1-059 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
2. Timman vs Wade 1-023 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialA00 Uncommon Opening
3. I Sokolov vs P Wells  ½-½30 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialE34 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Noa Variation
4. E L'Ami vs Short  ½-½35 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialE32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
5. J Werle vs Cherniaev 1-032 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialE94 King's Indian, Orthodox
6. J Smeets vs Adams 0-128 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialC45 Scotch Game
7. Speelman vs J Smeets  ½-½29 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialD10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
8. Adams vs J Werle 1-040 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialC99 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Chigorin, 12...cd
9. I Sokolov vs Van Wely  ½-½42 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
10. Cherniaev vs E L'Ami  ½-½47 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialC15 French, Winawer
11. P Wells vs Wade 1-035 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialA41 Queen's Pawn Game (with ...d6)
12. Short vs Timman 0-140 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialC67 Ruy Lopez
13. E L'Ami vs Adams  ½-½26 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialE37 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
14. J Werle vs Speelman ½-½24 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialE49 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3, Botvinnik System
15. Timman vs Cherniaev  ½-½31 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialE17 Queen's Indian
16. Wade vs Short 0-153 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialA46 Queen's Pawn Game
17. Van Wely vs P Wells  ½-½33 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialE34 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Noa Variation
18. J Smeets vs I Sokolov  1-045 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialC92 Ruy Lopez, Closed
19. P Wells vs Short  ½-½25 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialD07 Queen's Gambit Declined, Chigorin Defense
20. Cherniaev vs Wade 1-037 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialC41 Philidor Defense
21. I Sokolov vs J Werle  ½-½33 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialE17 Queen's Indian
22. Adams vs Timman 1-049 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialC80 Ruy Lopez, Open
23. Speelman vs E L'Ami 1-062 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
24. Van Wely vs J Smeets  ½-½47 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialD18 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
25. Timman vs Speelman  ½-½15 2008 Howard Staunton MemorialA13 English
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing >
Aug-17-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: Round 9
L'Ami 1/2Wells
Timman 1-0 Werle
Wade 0-1 Smeets
Short 1/2 Van Wely
Cherniaev 0-1 Sokolov
Adams 1-0 Speelman

Round 10
Wells vs. Speelman
Sokolov vs. Adams
Van Wely vs. Cherniaev
Smeets vs. Short
Werle vs. Wade
L'Ami vs. Timman

An exciting day with 4 decisive games! Adams crushed Speelman to lead with 7/9, but Sokolov, who mplays Adams today, kept on the pressure by blowing up Cherniaev's dubious opening. Timman won nicely against Werle's Petroff and Smeets had no difficulty dispatching Wade. Wells had the advantage against L'Ami as Black but was running out of time so he accepted the draw offer. Short-Van Wely looked good for White until Van Wely got queens off.

All games ended in first time control so we managed to get to the pub a bit early and put the time to good use.

Aug-17-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  PhilFeeley: The score chart here still doesn't make sense. Short's and Speelman's score is out of 8 while the rest are out of 9. This should be easy to fix.
Aug-17-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  PhilFeeley: Nice game from round 7. Deserves to be a puzzle for move 25.

Werle,J (2591) - Wells,P (2526) [D39]

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Nc3 dxc4 5.e4 Bb4 6.Bg5 c5 7.Bxc4 cxd4 8.Nxd4 Bxc3+ 9.bxc3 Qa5 10.Bb5+ Nbd7 11.Bxf6 Qxc3+ 12.Kf1 gxf6 13.h4 a6 14.Rh3 Qb4 15.Be2 0-0 16.Rb1 Qd6 17.Rg3+ Kh8 18.Qd2 Rg8 19.Rbb3 Rxg3 20.Rxg3 b6 21.Bh5 Bb7 22.Bxf7 Rf8 23.e5 Nxe5 24.Bxe6 f5 25.Rg7 Be4 26.Qh6 f4 27.Qf6 1-0

Aug-17-08   ILikeFruits: el senor wade has lost...
every game...
i may not be as good as wade...
so im not gonna say nothing...
Aug-17-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  just a kid: Poor old wade.
Aug-17-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: Games ended early today and we have an early start tomorrow at noon so here is the update. Games will follow in the morning.

Round 10
Wells 1/2 Speelman
Sokolov 1/2 Adams
Van Wely 1-0 Cherniaev
Smeets 1-0 Short
Werle 1-0 Wade
L'Ami 1/2Timman

Final Round
Adams (7.5) vs. Van Wely (7)
Timman (6) vs. Wells (4.5)
Cherniaev (3.5) vs. Smeets (6)
Speelman (5) vs. Sokolov (5.5)
Short (5) vs. Werle (5)
Wade (0) vs. L'Ami (5)

The Dutch side almost obliterated the British fleet today. After a hectic but on-time start after a UK memory contest forgot to finish by noon, there were tree bloody defeats. Chernaiev tried a Dutch Defense against Van Wely to no avail, Werle took out Wade's Cambridge Springs, and Smeets destroyed Short in spectacular fashion. Adams almost fell to Sokolov despite Sokolov's refusal to move his king's bishop or rook for the entire game, but he managed a draw. Timman played adventurously in the opening against his fellow countryman L'Ami but split the point, as did Wells and Speelman.

Tomorrow's final round pits the two leaders against each other, just like last year. The players can put plenty of effort into the game, as in the evening they will be treated to a big helping of Simpson's famous roast beef and a veritable lake of wine at the prizegiving where six thousand pounds, an artistic chess set valued at 850, and original artwork by the Staunton Society's renowned artist Barry Martin will be distributed.

Aug-17-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Knight to f6: <ILikeFruits> Wade is in his mid-80's according to the database, so it's no wonder to me that he has 0/9.

The number of players here aged 40 and above (6!) makes me wonder if this tournament is as much a memorial to them as to Staunton.

Aug-17-08   ILikeFruits: knight to f6......
u r right.....
i like wade....
as much as i like korchnoi....
long live knight to f6
Aug-18-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  TommyC: Congratulations to Michael Adams - quick draw today, so he wins the tournament.
Aug-18-08   Octavia: <Wade is in his mid-80's according to the database, so it's no wonder to me that he has 0/9.> lol ! Bob Wade was very much outgraded - nothing to do with his age !
Aug-18-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Knight to f6: <ILikeFruits> As a matter of fact, Korchnoi is one of my favourite players. I think he really deserved to become champion in '78.
Aug-18-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Rawprawn: <Bob Wade was very much outgraded - nothing to do with his age !> Well his age did tell in a few places. He lost from some quite good positions and seemed to be tiring after 4 hours or so.
Aug-19-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  xenophon: <TommyC: Congratulations to Michael Adams - quick draw today, so he wins the tournament>-maybe so but does he lose Elo points?
Aug-19-08   Cibator: A rather belated addition to the debate about the best British chessplayers (I've just returned to this site after a longish absence).

Blackburne was undoubtedly a fearsome tournament player, but the real business end of top-class chess is match play - and he couldn't do that for toffee. Lost every game against Steinitz, and didn't fare a lot better when he took on Lasker. (The Oxford Companion to Chess, in its article on JHB, is curiously reticent about these encounters.)

Aug-19-08   Illogic: I bet my whole bankroll on Wade winning the tournament. My chances are fading..
Aug-19-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: Van Wely offered the draw. Don't blame Mickey.
Aug-20-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  xenophon: <Eric Schiller: Van Wely offered the draw. Don't blame Mickey>

no blame meant-but i still wonder despite winning does he lose points-and if so does this make it more difficult to attract high rated GMs to events like this?

Aug-20-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  protean: <but i still wonder despite winning does he lose points>

Yes, his rating performance was 2713 (-22).

Aug-21-08   Cibator: Interesting statistic, <protean>. Confirms what I've said before, somewhere else on this site, that Mr Adams shouldn't mess around with second-rate events like the HSM if he's serious about wanting to get back into the world top ten.
Aug-21-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  atticuscc: <Cibator: Adams shouldn't mess around with second-rate events like the HSM>

This is nonsense. Adams conceded a trivial number of rating points, but succeeded in supporting a British tournament. Good for him - and Short!

The HSM may be a second-rate tournament by Wijk-aan-Zee standards, but it's one of very few international events in Britain these days. I've been critical of specific aspects of this year's HSM, mainly because I think the event has been diminished by them.

But I'm highly supportive of the event in principle. It's based on a nice idea (Anglo-Dutch competition); and it's been developing on the right lines until this year's false steps. Long may the HSM prosper; long may Adams & Short be invited.

David

Aug-21-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: There used to be a rule that the winner of a round-robin could not lose points. I don't now if it still holds.

In any case Mickey would have won points if he hadn't misplayed an endgame with the foolish ...Rh5 move so the event itself did not cause him to lose points. In any case 5-10 points means nothing at the elite level and would not cost any invitations. Being the winner of a prestige event is worth more.

Aug-21-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  mack: Also, who gives a tangerine toss about ratings?
Aug-23-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <Eric> I made the same point about tournament winners and ratings some time back, and was told that FIDE had dropped that rule.

Congratulations all round on a fascinating event. Personally I'd much rather see this kind of varied line-up than the same old unstoppable forces hitting immovable objects.

As for Bob Wade, obviously age is a huge factor. He was effectively GM strength in the late 60s, and was still rated near 2400 in the 70s. It's a sobering thought that here is a player who reached his peak before the introduction of the rating system.

Anyway, I still play the Wade Variation.

Aug-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: thanks for your congrats-whatever may happen in the future we can be very proud of the fact that we have staged 6 staunton memorials now with such a varied and high powered line up of players-with participants and officials including russia, canada, new zealand, usa, scotland, england and holland---and top players such as adams short speelman timman king howell gawain jones and sokolov.
Aug-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  mack: 'Whatever may happen in the future' - a tad ominous eh, Ray?
Jump directly to page #    (enter number from 1 to 5)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing >
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us keep the database squeaky clean!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | new kibitzing | chessforums | new games | Player Directory | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2008, Chessgames.com
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies